Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-DELHI -III Versus FORTUNE TECHNOCOMPS (P) LTD.

2016 (5) TMI 859 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Penalty under Section 271 (1) (c) - bogus purchases - Held that:- Having examined the impugned order of the ITAT and having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the Revenue, the Court is unable to discern any legal infirmity in the analysis or conclusion reached by the ITAT. Once the assessment order of the AO in the quantum proceedings was altered by the CIT (A) in a significant way, the very basis of initiation of the penalty proceedings was rendered non-existent. The AO could .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

RU, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr.P.Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel. FOR THE RESPONDENT : CM No. 17985 of 2016(exemption) 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. ITA No. 313 of 2016 2. This appeal by the Revenue is against the order dated 19th October 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No.4539/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year ( AY ) 2007-08. 3. By the impugned order the ITAT affirmed the order of the Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ine parties. Further a sum of ₹ 12,77,202 was added as additional income by applying the estimated gross profit rate of 4.25% on the declared sales. The ITAT thus concluded that the CIT(A) had made the overall addition of ₹ 68,31,196 on estimated basis . Consequently, the ITAT felt that this is not a case where a penalty was leviable under Section 271(1) (c) of the Act. 4. Mr. P.Roy Chaudhuri, learned counsel for the Revenue urged that while additions of ₹ 12.77 lakhs may have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quantum proceedings originally the AO had proposed an addition to the extent of ₹ 3,62,49,274/- as bogus transactions of purchases shown by the assessee from nine parties, as the alleged sellers were not traceable. In the appeal by the Assessee the CIT (A) held that the entire purchases could not be treated as bogus since the assessee had established the identity of the suppliers who had made substantial supplies. The CIT (A) held that the purchases made by the assessee were genuine and de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version