GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 906 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2016 (5) TMI 906 - CESTAT CHENNAI - 2016 (44) S.T.R. 124 (Tri. - Chennai) - Availment of Cenvat credit - Telephone/mobile phone, courier services and construction and repair services (pertaining to staff quarters) - period involved is April 2011 to December 2012 - Appellant contended that all the services availed by them for olr inside the factory premises, threfore, comes under the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 - Held that:- with regard to the credi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax paid thereon was allowed.Therefore, by following the same, the credit availed on the Telephone/mobile phone and courier services are allowed. - With respect to the repair and maintenance service pertaining to the appellants staff quarters, it is found that the services are in the nature of welfare activity and from 01.04.2011 onwards the credit availed on such welfare activities are not eligible for the credit under Rule 2(l) of the CCR 2004. Since the credit is held to be eligible on Te .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Chandrasekaran, AC (AR) ORDER M/s India Cements Ltd hereinafter referred to as the appellants are manufacturers of cements and are availing Cenvat credit on capital goods, inputs and input services. Appellants were issued with Show cause notices dated 22.08.2013 and 03.02.2014 denying the credit availed in respect of Telephone/mobile phone, courier services and construction and repair services( pertaining to the staff quarters) for the period involving April 2011 to December 2012 for a credit i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal no 191 &192/2014 dated 08.10.2014 had upheld the order of the adjudicating authority. Hence this appeal is preferred by the appellants. 3. Appellant was represented by Ms. Minchu Mariam Punnoose and Shri S. Muthu Venkataraman, Advocates and the department was represented by Shri R. Chandrasekaran, A.C. (AR). The counsel for the appellants submitted that as per the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, any services used by the manufacturer, wheth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions were taken inside the appellants factory premises and the invoices are raised in the appellants name only. In support of the same, sample invoices were also submitted. Further, with regard to the credit availed on construction and repair service of the appellants staff quarters, it was submitted that the said service was pertaining to the appellants staff quarters, which is also part of the appellants factory and it is the responsibility of the appellant to take proper maintenance of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version