Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Vinod Choudhary Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur

2015 (6) TMI 1036 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Period of limitation - Appeal filed beyond condonable period of delay - Appellant contended that order in original dated 23.12.2010 was received on 16.1.2012 and appeal was filed on 27.3.2012 and hence was filed within the stipulated time - Held that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vice. Therefore, the appeal filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) was clearly beyond even the statutorily condonable period and therefore the Commissioner (Appeals) was right to conclude that he had no option but to reject the appeal as time barred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pondent: Shri B.B. Sharma, D.R. Per R.K. Singh : When the case was called today, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and therefore with the consent of ld. DR, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit and proceed to decide the appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he condonable period of delay. 3. The appellant contended before Commissioner (Appeals) that the order in original dated 23.12.2010 was received on 16.1.2012 and appeal was filed on 27.3.2012 and hence was filed within the stipulated time. 4. We find .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1944 every decision or order passed or any summons or notice issued under this Act or the rules made thereunder, shall be deemed to have been served on the date on which the decision, order, summons or notice is tendered or delivered by post or a cop .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce to rebut such presumption of deemed service. The Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CCE, Ludhiana Vs. Mohan Bottling Co. (P) Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT 321 (P&H) has categorically held that we have also carefully examined Secti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version