Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Versus Commr. of Central Excise, Shillong

Eligibility of Cenvat credit of NCCD - paid on input panmasala received by the appellant from the suppliers who availed the benefit of Notification No. 27/2001-CE dated-11/5/2001 - Rule 3(1)(v) of the CENVAT Credit Rules - Held that:- the contention raised by the appellant, that NCCD duty credit utilized by debiting the CENVAT Credit account, cannot be denied for units not availing area based exemption, is acceptable as these amounts are not hit by the CENVAT Credit Rules. The amount of such NCC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1 return copies for the month of March, 2002, March, 2003 and March, 2004 that appellant has indicated the NCCD CENVAT Credit taken by the appellant. Appellant has also given a list of all the input materials and their registration numbers. It is also observed from the covering letters filing ER-1 returns that even photo copies of Cenvatable invoices were also submitted to the department by the appellant. Therefore, five year’s extended period of demand cannot be invoked against the appellant. H .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules were known to the department also. Periodical audits of the appellant’s unit were also done by the Internal Audit parties of the department. If department could not raise doubts about the admissibility of credit then Appellant cannot be held responsible for taking a deliberately wrong credit for imposing penalty. Accordingly, it is held that penalty under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be imposed and is set aside. - Appeal disposed of - Exci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earing for the appellant and through written submissions argued that appellants are the manufacturer of Gutka classifiable under Chapter 24 of the schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. That officers of Central Excise, Guwahati during a visit on 16/3/2006 observed that appellant is taking CENVAT credit of National calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) paid on panmasala which was received from other units as input on which NCCD was paid. That it is the case of the Revenue that appellant is not el .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made the bench go through the provision of Rule 3 (1) (V) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2001/2002 or 2004 to argue that credit of NCCD paid on the inputs is admissible. That provisions contained in Rule-10 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2001/2002 or Rule 12 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 have been made as an abundant caution and cannot take away the credit admissibility as per Rule 3 (1) (V) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.That Notification No. 27/2001-CE has to be considered as an integrated part of incentives g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resent facts. That SLP filed by the Revenue against this order has been dismissed by Apex Court as per citation 2010 (256) ELT a 161 (S.C.). That as per the following case laws the duty is deemed to be paid even if subsequently refunded under an area based exemption notification:- (i) CCE, Jallandhar Vs. Kay Kay Industries [[2013 (295) E.L.T. 177 (S.C.) (II) CCE, Chennai-I Vs. CEGAT, Chennai [2006 (202) ELT 753 (Mad.)] 2.2 That as per case law CCE, Mumbai Vs. Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd. [2014 ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ken and also the address/registration number of the Panmasala suppliers. Learned Advocate made the bench go through illustrative copies of such returns on page 72,75 & 76 of the appeal. That penalty is not invokable as extended period is not invokable and also due to the fact that it was a case of genuine legal interpretation. 2.4 That credit of NCCD utilized by debiting NCCD credit from RG-23 of the CENVAT credit of the appellant cannot be denied which is not refunded under area based exemp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tification No. 32/99-CE & 33/99-ce have been made applicable to implement Notification No. 27/2001-CE. (iii) That Notification No. 27/2001-CE dated 11/5/2001 does not find mention in Rule 10 and Rule 12 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2001/2002 or CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 which only make CENVAT credit admissible even if the end products stand exempted. (iv) That there is nothing in the CENVAT Credit that Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit will prevail over Rules 10 or Rule 12 of the CENVAT Credit Rules .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

specific mention in these Rules. (vii) That the word Notwithstanding used in the opening paragraph of Rule 10 or Rule 12 of the CENVAT Credit Rules will mean that special provision of Rule 10 or Rule 12 will prevail over general provisions of Rule 3 or Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules. Learned Special Counsel relied upon Gujarat High Court s decision in the case of Adani Power Ltd. Vs. U.O.I. [2015 (330) ELT 883 (Guj.)] 4) Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in the pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1-CE is also issued to extend area based benefit to the manufacturer. Appellant has claimed that CENVAT Credit of NCCD is admissible to them as per the provisions of Rule 3 (1) (V) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.It is also observed that as per Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, no credit of the duty on inputs is admissible if the end product stands exempted. Under area based exempted notification No. 32/99-CE and 33/99-CE, both dated 8/7/1999, as well as Notification No. 27/2001-CE dated-11/5/2001 w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lant that CENVAT credit of NCCD is admissible as per Rule 3 (1) (v) of CENVAT Credit Rules is not absolute and cannot be appreciated. Rule 3 (1) (v) cannot be read in isolation when other Rules like Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules are also existing in the scheme of taking CENVAT credit. Admissibility of CENVAT Credit under Rule 3 of the CENVAT credit is also subject to fulfillment of other conditions specified elsewhere in the CENVAT Credit Rules. Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2001/2002 (CCR 01/0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on, Kutch district of Gujarat, State of Jammu and Kashmir and State of Sikkim-Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, where a manufacturer has cleared any inputs or capital goods, in terms of notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance(Department of Revenue) No. 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 or No. 33/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 [G.S.R. 509 (E), dated the 8th July, 1999] or No. 39/2001-Central Excise, DATED THE 31ST July, 2001 [ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, dated the 25th June, 2003 [G.S.R. 513 ( E ), dated the 25th June, 2003] or 71/2003-Central Excise, dated the 9th September, 2003 [ G.S.R. 717 ( E ), dated the 9th September, 2003, the CENVAT credit on such inputs or capital goods shall be admissible as if no portion of the duty paid on such inputs or capital goods was exempted under any of the said notifications. 4.2 A plain reading of the above Rules reveal that area based exemptions 32/99-CE & 33/99-CE, both dated 8/7/1999, are mentione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cified areas for the purpose of taking CENVAT Credit. The argument taken by the appellant, that these provisions are made as an abundant caution or are clarificatory and has no relevance, is thus required to be rejected. On the contrary the opening phrase of this Rule 12 containing the words Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules has to be interpreted to mean that in spite of the provisions contained in Rule 3 & Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, credit of whole of duty paid thr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(supra) and others are not relevant as none of these case laws are with respect to admissibility of CENVAT credit under special provisions contained in Rule 10 and Rule 12 of CCR 01/02 and CCR 04 respectively. In view of the above on merit, CENVAT credit of NCCD, refunded under area based exemption No. 27/2000-CE, is not admissible to the appellant. 6. However, the contention raised by the appellant, that NCCD duty credit utilized by debiting the CENVAT Credit account, cannot be denied for unit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version