Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Raymond Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III

2016 (5) TMI 1118 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Refund claim - excess duty paid - procedure of provisional assessment not followed - Unjust enrichment - Held that:- the appellant admittedly filed the refund claim within one year. It is also not in dispute that the goods were supplied to the appellant's own unit, therefore the valuation provision of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 applies. According to which, the price at the time of clearance of the goods is always provisional price. The final price can be ascertained only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appellant. I am therefore of the view that merely because the appellant have not followed the procedure of provisional assessment, the price at which the duty was paid at the time of clearance cannot be treated as final assessment. Therefore, for this reason refund of excess paid duty cannot be denied by relying on the various judgments. - As regards unjust enrichment, it is found that the assessee was under bonafide belief that their stand that since the recipient unit has not availed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny other person. - Appeal disposed of by way of remand - Appeal No. E/159/2011 - A/86090/16/SMB - Dated:- 9-2-2016 - SHRI RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Sushant Murthy, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri N.N. Prabhu Desai, Supdt. (A.R) ORDER This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. PKS/355/BEL/2010 dated 19th October, 2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Mumbai-III. 2. The fact of the case is that the appellant supplied Polyester To .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of clearance of the goods was in excess to the actual duty payable as per CAS4. Hence the appellant applied for the refund of excess paid duty. The refund claim was rejected by the adjudicating authority on two counts. First on the ground that the appellant have not followed the procedure of a provisional assessment and second they have not proved the aspect on unjust enrichment. On the appeal filed by the appellant before the Commissioner (Appeal), the appeal was rejected upholding both the gr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ved at only on the basis of CAS4 which normally cannot be ascertained at the time of clearance of the goods. If the procedure of provisional assessment is followed the only benefit to the assessee is that limitation provided under Section 11B does not come in the way for claiming the refund. In the present case, the refund claim was filed within one year. Therefore, even though the provisional assessment was not followed, the refund of duty paid in excess cannot be denied. In support of his subm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be denied. As regard unjust enrichment he submits that the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) decided the issue of unjust enrichment on the basis of Tribunal judgment in the case of Century Enka Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. Pune 2006 (206) E.L.T. 663 (Tri.-Mumbai) wherein it was held that merely because Cenvat Credit has not been taken by sister unit does not mean that incidence of duty has not been passed on. However, in the same judgment the matter was remanded to verify the said fact on the basis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authority for submitting the necessary documents and evidences to establish that the incidence of duty for which refund is sought for, has not been passed on to any other person. 4. On the other hand, Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Learned Supdt. (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order and submits that it is a mandatory provision to follow the provisional assessment and if the provisional assessment is not followed the assessment attained finality and no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case of Century Enka Ltd. (supra). According to which, merely by not taking the Cenvat Credit by the recipient of the goods it cannot be established that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. He relied upon the following judgments: (i) Century Enka Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Pune-2006 (206) E.L.T. 663 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ii) Maharashtra Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CESTAT, Mumbai-2010 (259) E.L.T.369 (Bom.) (iii) Commissioner of C.Ex. Chennai Vs. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd.-2006 (4) S.T.R. 585 ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

E.L.T. 742 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ix) Munjal Auto Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. & S.T. Vadodara-2014 (307) E.L.T. 577 (Tri.Ahmd.) (x) Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur Vs. Blastech (India) Pvt. Ltd.-2011 (274) E.L.T. 210 (Tri.Del.) (xi) Sanat Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-2015 (323) E.L.T. 682 (All.) (xii) Western Coalfields Ltd. Vs. CESTAT, New Delhi-2013 (288) E.L.T. 203 (Bom.) (xiii) Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-III-2013 (295) E.L. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appellant admittedly filed the refund claim within one year. It is also not in dispute that the goods were supplied to the appellants own unit, therefore the valuation provision of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 applies. According to which, the price at the time of clearance of the goods is always provisional price. The final price can be ascertained only on the basis of CAS4, which can be prepared only after completion of the financial year and on availability of the actua .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l assessment, the price at which the duty was paid at the time of clearance cannot be treated as final assessment. Therefore, for this reason refund of excess paid duty cannot be denied. The judgments relied upon by the Ld. Counsel directly apply to the facts of the present case. In the case of Premier Explosives Ltd. it was held as under: 9. On a very careful consideration of the issue, we find that in terms of the agreement between the respondents and the buyers, the price is subject to variat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

examine the refund claim. It is reiterated that the question of the assessment being final or provisional is not relevant to a case where the refund claim has been filed within the time limit. All the case laws cited by the learned Advocate are very relevant. When there is price variation clause in the agreement when the price increases the respondent normally discharges the differential duty due to the government. The same treatment has to be meted out to the respondent in terms of the various .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns, I note that the appellant objects to the refund on the ground of unjust enrichment. It is submitted that, once the goods were cleared on payment of appropriate duty, refund of such duty cannot be claimed after issuing credit notes to the buyer. The lower appellate authority has relied on the Tribunals decision in Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. v. Collector - 1997 (95) E.L.T. 386 (Tribunal), wherein it had been held that, if price was revised upwards or downwards in terms of price escalation c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version