Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kedarnath Dubey, Pramod Singh, AL-Karim Scrap Traders Pvt Ltd, Devendra Pal Tank, Parmeshwari Steels Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik

Waiver of penalty imposed - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Main noticee against whom duty, interest and penalty was proposed have paid duty, interest and 25% of penalty within one month from the date of show cause notice, therefore, the proceedings against the present appellant should also stands concluded along with the main assessee - Held that:- the duty liability has been discharged after the issuance of show cause notice. In my view, the benefits which are available to an a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the amount as that the entire order-in-original is set aside as the first appellate authority has considered the extension of benefits of Section 11A to the assessee only on the ground that he has paid the amount in full. If the assessee would not have paid this amount, this benefit would not have been extended to him. Therefore all the appellants are entitled for the immunity as per proviso to Section 11A (2) and accordingly they are entitled for the waiver of penalty imposed on them under Ru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A No. AKP/NSK/22 to 29/2011 dt. 31.1.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise & Customs, Nashik. 2. The issue involved in the present case is that if the main appellant, against whom, the demand of excise duty, interest and penalty were proposed, discharge the liability of duty, interest and 25% of penalty within one month from the date of show cause notice whether the proceedings against Co-noticees in the same show cause notice shall stand concluded and whether they are not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee and not to the noticees. On the other co-notice the penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 was proposed by way of the same show cause notice. Accordingly, the Ld. Commissioner held that the proceedings against the main assessee against whom the demand of duty was proposed can only be conclusive and not in respect of other co-noticees. Aggrieved by the impugned order the appellants are before me. 3. Shri Vinay Sejpal, Shri Ashok Kumar Singh and Shri Mahesh Raichandani, Ld. Co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

only such noticee against whom duty demand was raised is to be treated as such person to whom the show cause notice was issued under Section 11A(1) of the Act. The other Co-noticees to whom the penalty under Rule 26 was proposed, the show cause notice to these persons also were under Section 11A(1) only, therefore when the main assessee against whom the duty demand was proposed, pays duty, interest and 25% penalty, the proceedings against such person as well as all other persons involved in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngs Pvt. Ltd. Ravindra C Aggarwal Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-I 2015-TIOL-396-CESTAT-MUM (v) Tikam P. Bhojwani Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad 2011 (272) E.L.t. 88 (Tri-Ahmd.) (vi) Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad, Nasik-II Ambika Waste Management Pvt. Ltd. & Others Order No. A/3778-3781/15/SMB dt. 23.11.2015 (v) Commissioner of C.Ex., Raipur Vs. Jai Ambey Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. 2013 (295) E.L.T. 453 (Tri. - Del.) (vi) Commissioner of Centra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

view (1) Commissioner of Central Excise Raipur Vs. Shri Anand Agarwal & Others 2013-TIOL-26-CESTAT-DEL (2) Shri Ghanshyamdas C. Goyal Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad 2015-TIOL-756-CESTAT-MUM. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. I find that the appellants sought waiver of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the ground that the main noticee in the show cause notice against whom duty, interest and penalty was proposed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

posed, proceedings their against shall also be concluded. Accordingly, no penalty can be imposed in terms of proviso to Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act. The operative portion of the various judgments are reproduced below: (i) In the case of Jai Ambey Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. (supra)held that - 7. In the present case, the Revenue's main contention is that the proceedings under Section 11A(2) of Central Excise Act are not concluded. I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ame show cause notice vide order dated 11-6-2012 in Appeal No. E/978/2010 held that proceedings under Section 11A(2) are to be treated as closed . (ii) In the case Deepak Patel (supra) held that - 2. The counsel for the respondent submits that as per the provisions of the first proviso to Section 11A(2) when a case is against an assessee is settled under Section 11A(1A), no further proceedings is maintainable against any other person to whom notice is issued under Section 11A(1). I find that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

11A(1A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with proviso to sub-section (2) of the said Section 11, very clearly indicates that if an assessee discharges the entire duty liability along with interest and 25% of the amount of duty liability, then the proceedings comes to an end. Provisions also indicate that there is no need for issuance of show cause notice. It is pointed out by the learned DR that in this case, the duty liability has been discharged after the issuance of show cause notice. In my v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Revenue that assessee may seek refund of the amount as that the entire order-in-original is set aside as the first appellate authority has considered the extension of benefits of Section 11A to the assessee only on the ground that he has paid the amount in full. If the assessee would not have paid this amount, this benefit would not have been extended to him. 7. In my view, the issue is covered by the decision of the Division Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Sonam Clock Pvt. Limited .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version