GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI

2016 (5) TMI 1137 - ITAT DELHI - TMI - Penalty under Sections 271D and 271E - period of limitation - Held that:- The impugned orders levying the penalties under Sections 271D and 271E of the Act are barred by limitation because the penalty order should have been passed not later than 30.06.2012, however, in the present case, the penalty orders were passed by the ld. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Range-2, New Delhi on 15.06.2013 - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA Nos. 6256 & 6257/D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 3. During the Course of hearing the ld. Counsel for the assessee raised the issue of limitation under Rule 27 of Income Tax (AT) Rules, 1963. As the Ld. CIT(A) had considered this ground of the assessee and decided the issue against the assessee, we hold that the assessee is entitled to raise this ground on the issue of limitation under Rule 27 of Income Tax (AT)000 Rules. 4. In the present case, it is noticed that the ld. CIT(A) in paras 4.3 to 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

courts / tribunals cited in its submissions, and the order passed u/s 271D / 271E is barred by limitation prescribed therein. Section 275(l)(c) provides that no order imposing a penalty under the chapter shall be passed (i) after the expiry of the Financial Year (FY) in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for the imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or (ii) six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated, which ever .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s within the period of limitation prescribed u/s 275(1 )(c). 4.5 In view of the above, this ground of appeal raised by the appellant is contrary to the law in the matter and is, accordingly, dismissed." 5. During the course of hearing the ld. Counsel for the assessee at the very outset stated that this issue is covered by the order dated 08.03.2016 of the ITAT Delhi Bench F , New Delhi in the case of DCIT, Central Circle-03, New Delhi Vs M/s Raj Katha Products P. Ltd. in ITA Nos.5853, 5854, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssions of both the parties and the material on record, it is noticed that an identical issue having similar facts has been adjudicated by the ITAT Delhi bench F , New Delhi in the aforesaid referred to case of DCIT, Central Circle-03, New Delhi Vs M/s Raj Katha Products P. Ltd. wherein the relevant findings have been given in paras 3.1 to 3.4 of the order dated 08.03.2016 which read as under: 3.1. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Principal CIT-5 vs. Jkd Capital & Finelase Ltd. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated, whichever period expires later. 9. In terms of the above provision, there are two distinct periods of limitation for passing a penalty order, and one that expires later will apply. One is the end of the financial year in which the quantum proceedings are completed in the first instance. In the present case, at the level of the AO, the quantum proceeding was completed on 28th December 2007. Going by this date, the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lty proceedings the AO appeared to be conscious of the fact that he did not have the power to issue notice as far as the penalty proceedings under Section 271-E was concerned. He, therefore, referred the matter concerning penalty proceedings under Section 271-E to the Additional CIT. For some reason, the Additional CIT did not issue a show cause notice to the Assessee under Section 271-E(1) till 20th March 2012. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay of nearly five years after the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version