Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Range-8 (1) , Mumbai Versus M/s Benhoor Regency Estates P. Ltd.

2016 (5) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI

Eligibility for deduction u/s 80IB(10) on a plot/housing project - Held that:- Ownership of the plot is not necessary for availing the claimed deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the Act. See Radhe Developers case [2011 (12) TMI 248 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA Nos. 4085 & 4086/Mum/2012 - Dated:- 20-4-2016 - Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member And Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member For the Revenue : Shri Maurya Pratap-DR For the Assessee : Shri Vimap Punamiya ORDER Per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are not fulfilled by the assessee. 2. During hearing of these appeals, Shri Vimal Punamiya, ld. counsel for the assessee, at the outset, claimed that the impugned issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the order of the Tribunal dated 22/03/2016 for Assessment year 2007-08 (ITA No.8260/Mum/2011). This factual matrix was consented to be correct by Shri Maurya Pratap, Ld. DR. 2.1. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. In view of the above, we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

143 (3) of the Act, on 24/12/2009 determining the income of the assessee at ₹ 7.82 crores. 2. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that the assessee had claimed deduction of ₹ 7.56 crores u/s.80 IB (10) of the Act,, that the assessee had entered into an agreement with the owner of a plot of land, that the owners had obtained permission for redevelopment, sale and transfer from the competent authority, that the owner said engaged the assessee for developing the plot, that a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority (FAA). Before him it was argued that deduction u/s.80 IB (10) was not dependent on ownership, that deduction was allowable if the profits were derived from the business of developing and construction of residential unit, that there was no requirement in the provision that the assessee carrying on the said business should also on the plot of land. After considering the submission of the assessee and the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2.5% of the gross sales receipt in respect of sale of flats and other premises constructed by utilisation of FSI were to be received by the owners and balance belonged to the assessee company, that all the efforts to develop the plot of land were made by the assessee and not by the owner of the land, that it had incurred all the expenses towards development of land and construction of multistoryed building. Relying upon the case of Radhe Developers (23 SOT420),he decided the issue in favour of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iling deduction u/s.80 IB (10) of the Act ownership of the plot of land was not necessary. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material before us. We find that the Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Radhe Developers (ITR) has held as under: Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requires involvement of an undertaking in developing and building housing projects approved by the local authority. Certain conditions are prescribed in sub-section (10) such as the date .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat ownership of the land would be a condition precedent for developing the housing project. Such requirement cannot be read into the statute because there is nothing in section 80-IB(10) of the Act requiring that ownership of the land must vest in the developer for him to be able to qualify for such deduction. Moreover, the term developer has been understood in common parlance as well as in the legal sense as carrying a much wider connotation. It is well settled that while interpreting a statut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version