Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 1197 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (5) TMI 1197 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (44) S.T.R. 116 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Entitlement for availment of Cenvat credit - receipt of duty paid goods i.e. Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder - availed Cenvat credit thereon - reissue the same on payment of duty or for export - no manufacturing activity has been undertaken - Held that:- the assesee is entitle to avail Cenvat credit on the duty paid goods even though the said duty paid goods does not undergo manufacturing process. The only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ken is not input service - Held that:- the goods are inputs in terms of Rule 16, therefore, the inward transportation of such goods shall be undoubtedly qualified as input service, even as per the interpretation drawn by the Ld. Commissioner, therefore the credit on inward GTA service in respect of transportation of the goods namely Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder is also admissible. Since we are of the view that Cenvat credit in respect of the goods is admissible in terms of Rule .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.,(A.R.) ORDER PER : RAMESH NAIR This appeal is directed against Order-in- Original No. 109/2010-11/C dated 4/3/2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Nagpur whereby Ld. Commissioner passed following order: 1) I disallow the Cenvat Credit of duty on Inputs amounting to ₹ 1,45,10,363/-[BED ₹ 1,41,95,115/- + Education Cess ₹ 2,89,007/- + Secondary & Higher Secondary Education Cess ₹ 26,241/- ] ( in words: Rs. One Crore Forty Five Lakhs Ten Thou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rds: Rs. Forty Nine Lakhs Fifty Five Thousand and Four Hundred and Seventy Nine only] taken on Service tax, Education cess and Secondary & Higher Secondary Education Cess and order the recovery of the same from the noticee in terms of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with first proviso to Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 along with interest. 3) I order the recovery of the interest at the appropriate rate from the noticee, on the amount demanded as above in terms of Section 11 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Services received by them, under the provisions of Rule 3 Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant during the period from 1/4/2005 to 31/3/2010, received 2686 Nos. of Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder from their sister concern M/s. NSSL Ltd. MIDC, Hingna, Dist. Nagpur and sold to its constomer without doing any manufacturing process and thereby such goods had been treated in common parlance of business activity. For the transport of aforesaid goods, while procuring the same fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d on inward GTA service in relation to purchase of goods has also been denied on the ground that since goods namely Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder are not inputs, the transportation of the goods cannot be treated as inward transportation of goods which are other than inputs. 3. Shri. Gajendra Jain, Ld. Advocate with Shri. Rajesh Ostwal, Advocate for the Appellants appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant purchased Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that even if the process carried out by the appellant is not amount to manufacture, Cenvat credit is permissible in the nature of the above transaction as provided in Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. In this support he placed reliance in case of CCE Vs. Tapsheel Enterprises[2007(216) ELT 284 (T)] and Brakes India Ltd Vs. CCE[2007(214) ELT 389(T)]. He submits that all the goods i.e. Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder sold by the appellant falls under Chapter 87 and Section X .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CCE[2006(201) ELT 275(T)] He alternatively submits that since transaction is between the group companies, had the appellant and NSSL followed alternate procedure under Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, no demand would have been arisen. In this regard, he placed reliance on the following judgments: (a) International Auto Ltd Vs. CCE[2005(183) ELT 239(SC)] (b) Lawkim Limited Vs. CCE, Pune- II[2007(218) ELT 142(T)] (c) P.R. Rolling Mills Private Limited Vs. CCE[2010(249) ELT 232(T)] He su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the appellant is not of manufacture, in such case clearance of the goods in question shall be treated as clearance of inputs as such. In that event whatever Cenvat credit was availed is required to be paid on the removal of input as such. In the present case on the quantum of domestic clearance the excise duty was paid to the tune of ₹ 58,24,273/- as against the Cenvat credit availed on the same goods amounting to ₹ 57,12,225/-. For this reason also whatever credit was availed st .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

credit is admissible treating the goods as input inward transportation of these goods are admissible for Cenvat credit. He further submits that the quantification of Cenvat credit of GTA service was wrongly done by the Adjudicating authority, for this reason that the department has taken entire amount of freight for the period 2005-06 to 2008-09 whereas actual transportation of machine casting from the appellant to NSSL and NSSL to the appellant is involving service tax of ₹ 8022/- only t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on also. 4. Shri. V. K. Agrawal, Ld. ADC., (A.R.) appearing for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. 6. We find that the Ld. Counsel made various alternative submissions. We find that activity of the appellant i.e. receipt of duty paid goods i.e. Oil Slump Body, Cylinder Head & Rover Cylinder, availment of Cenvat credit thereon and reissue the same on payment of duty or for export is squarely covered by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

utilise this credit according to the said rules. (2) If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received under sub-rule (1) at the rate applicable on the date of removal and on the value determined under sub-section (2) of section 3 or section 4 or section 4A of the Act, as the case may be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version