Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Vijay M. Haria Versus Income Tax Officer-13 (3) (21) , Mumbai

Addition u/s 68 - undisclosed cash deposits - Held that:- The assessee has failed to bring on record any material evidence to controvert the findings of the learned CIT(A). We, therefore, see no reason to interfere with or deviate from the findings of the learned CIT(A) that the assessee has failed to satisfactorily explain the source of cash deposits of ₹ 25,93,000/- in his undisclosed bank account with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai - Decided against assessee

Set off of busi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allowed to be set off as per the provisions of section 70 to 79 of the Act. No material evidence has been placed before us to controvert this finding of the learned CIT(A).- Decided against assessee

Charging of interest under section 234B and 234C is consequential and mandatory and the AO has no discretion in the matter. See Anjum Ghaswala (2001 (10) TMI 4 - SUPREME Court ) - ITA No. 4859/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 25-5-2016 - Shri Jason P. Boaz, Accountant Member And Shri Sandeep Gosain, Ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/- from business and also declared loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- from futures and options. The case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') vide order dated 22.12.2011, wherein the income of the assessee was determined at ₹ 25,93,000/-; in view of the addition of ₹ 25,93,000/- under section 68 of the Act on account of unexplained cash credits of ₹ 25,93,000/- and disallowance of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and partly allowed the assessee s claim of loss from futures and options at ₹ 15,03,455/- instead of ₹ 17,60,242/- as business loss under section 43(5) of the Act which is allowed to be set off as per the provisions of section 70 to 79 of the Act. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A)-34, Mumbai dated 27.03.2014 for A.Y. 2009-10, the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds: - 1. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai [he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e action of the Ld. A.O. in making addition of ₹ 25,93,000/- under section 69 of the Act (instead under section 68 made by the Ld. A.O.) being cash deposited in his saving bank account maintained with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai treating the same as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act. The Appellant prays that the addition under section 69 of the Act is without any basis and the same may be deleted. (ii) The Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that cash deposited in the sav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

proceedings to prove the genuineness of cash transactions. Hence, treating the cash amounting to ₹ 25,93,000/- deposited in the saving bank account of the Appellant as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act is unjustified and the same may be deleted. 3. Denying the benefit of setoff of business loss against the addition made under section 69 of the Act -Rs.9,66,297/- (i) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the Ld. A.O. in not disallowing the benefit of setoff of b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7,60,242/- incurred during the impugned assessment year without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case. The Appellant, therefore, prays that the disallowance of Short Term Capital Loss is not at all justified. Hence, the same may be deleted. (ii) The Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that during the course of the assessment proceedings, the Appellant has furnished all the relevant details called for, to prove the genuineness of Short Term Capital Loss incurred by the Appellant. Thus, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

occasion, the case was adjourned at the request of the learned D.R. for Revenue and on the other dates of hearing none was present for the assessee. We find that even the notices for hearing issued by RPAD have returned unserved. On 23.05.2016, when the case was called for hearing, none was present for the assessee, but the learned D.R. was ready and present for Revenue. In these circumstances, we are of the view that the assessee is not interested in pursuing this appeal seriously and therefor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

k account with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai under section 69 of the Act. It is contended that the cash deposited in the aforesaid bank account is out of cash sales made by the assessee during the relevant period under consideration and that all relevant details/evidences in this regard were furnished before the authorities below in order to prove the genuineness of the cash deposits. It is submitted that in view of the above, the said addition be deleted as it is unjustified. 6.2 Per contra, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at after due consideration of the assessee s averments, the AO observed that the said bank account and alleged share transactions were never disclosed in the assessee s financial statements and assessee s claim that the said cash deposits were made from cash in hand and subsequently that they were from cash sales were not supported by any material evidence and consequently brought the same to tax in the assessee s hands i.e. ₹ 25,93,000/- as unexplained deposits. Since the assessee also di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

usiness concern, M/s. Blue Impex, engaged in the business of exporting goods and got them audited, the transactions of cash deposits in the assessee s account in Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai and in respect of futures and option transactions were neither disclosed or reflected in his returns of income nor were they got audited inspite of the transactions running into crores of rupees. The learned D.R. submitted that in these circumstances the learned CIT(A) concluded that the assessee s expla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ties below. The learned CIT(A) has after considering the findings of the AO (at para 4.2 of the impugned order) and the assessee s submissions (para 4.2 of the impugned order) has held as under: - 4.3 Decision :- I have considered the facts of the case and the submissions made by the assessee. 4.3.1 It is observed from the perusal of sales register and cash book and bank pass book of the savings bank account of the assessee with the Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai that cash sales as reflected i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9 Cash 1,00,000 07/02/2009 Cash 70,000 07/02/2009 Cash 30,000 02/03/2009 Cash 2,50,000 20/03/2009 Cash 1,75,000 20/03/2009 Cash 25,000 20/03/2009 Cash 65,000 20/03/2009 Cash 1,10,000 21/03/2009 Cash 3,00,000 Total 25,93,000 4.3.2 Perusal of the bank book and cash book maintained by the assessee in his books of account and copy of the bank pass book with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai reveal that the entries tally exactly and the cash balance and bank balance as per books tally with audited boo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exporting goods to various countries and whose accounts are tax audited by a tax auditor and another set of personal accounts of which transactions are partially reflected in the pass book of savings bank account of assessee with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai and these entries/transactions do not figure anywhere in the business books of the assessee in the name of Blue Impex. Assessee has also not got his accounts in respect of future and options transactions as well as share purchase and sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are reflected in the total sales of ₹ 54,11,64,156/ 50,39,11,658 in accounts and cash and bank balance figures of the business accounts in the name of Blue Impex tally, the entries of transfer of cash totalling ₹ 25,93,000/- exactly tally with the requirement of cash of the assessee to make payment to third parties from his savings bank account with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai (CBMM) for trading in shares and on forwarding in futures and options and/or for giving interest free l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ransfer totalling ₹ 25,93,000/- from the business accounts to the personal account are not reflected in books of the assessee Blue Impex either as a loan to the individual account or by way of debit to the capital account of the assessee as reflected in the books of account of Blue Impex. Either whenever cash was transferred from the business account of Blue Impex which are audited, the sum transferred should have been reflected in the books as a loan or as a reduction of capital account, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

000 - 17,60,242) may have been adjusted towards some other payments or inflating the bank balance with CBMM which resulted in the bank balance of ₹ 9,34,885/61 by assessee in CBMM as on 31/3/2009. (Since, the accounts of the assessee are not audited for personal transactions in trading in futures and options and shares,) 4.3.5 Thus, it is concluded that these cash sales transactions totalling ₹ 25,93,000/- and the deposits of the same with CBMM are dubious in nature because 1) these .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re not available with the assessee 6) assessee could have earned more by exporting these goods and assessee has not been able to identify the goods sold. This clearly indicates that assessee has manipulated his accounts and whenever he needed cash, he has disclosed the amount required as cash sales in his business books and immediately gone ahead with transferring cash from his business accounts to his savings account with CBMM, however, these transactions were not reflected in business accounts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cash transfer from the business accounts to the personal accounts are not reflected anywhere in business accounts of Blue Impex. Thus, it is held that the deposits of cash made in CBMM account appear to be transfer, to have come by way of cash from Blue Impex to the personal account with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai, the entries were systematically made to give them a colour of legitimacy to account for unaccounted cash deposits with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai from time to time as per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ter taking into consideration the submissions of the learned D.R. for Revenue and the findings of the learned CIT(A) (supra), we find that all the submissions put forth by the assessee have been addressed and rebutted in detail by the learned CIT(A). We are of the considered view that, except for raising these grounds, the assessee has failed to bring on record any material evidence to controvert the findings of the learned CIT(A). We, therefore, see no reason to interfere with or deviate from t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uring the year against the addition of ₹ 25,93,000/-. 7.2 Per contra, the learned D.R. for Revenue supported the finding of the learned CIT(A) in the impugned order in denying the assessee s claim for set off of business loss of ₹ 9,66,297/- against the income of ₹ 25,93,000/- under section 69 of the Act, as no evidence has been brought on record to controvert the findings of the learned CIT(A). 7.3.1 We have heard the learned D.R. at length and perused and carefully considered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 of I.T. Act, 1961 and the Assessing Officer has erred in denying the same. First of all the income of ₹ 25,93,000/- is assessable to tax under section 69 of I.T. Act, 1961 which is enshrined in chapter VI of I.T. Act, 1961 and each section starting from 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69D of I.T. Act, 1961 is a separate head of income in itself and income taxed under each one of these sections is taxable as Income of the assessee of that previous year/financial year and provisions of section relati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from House Property, Business Income, Income from other sources and Capital Gains only. Thus, the provisions of section 70 to 79 of I.T. Act, 1961 are crystal clear and set off of losses from house property, business, capital gains and other sources can be set off only against the incomes from Income from House Property, Business Income, Capital Gains and Income from other sources as per limitations placed in section 70 to 79 of I.T. Act, 1961 only and not against any income which is charged/ch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/Chandigarh. The quantification and set off of losses of ₹ 9,66,297/- is further subject to comments made in following paragraphs. In nutshell, ground of appeal number A (4) is rejected. 7.3.2 After taking into account the submissions of the learned D.R. for Revenue and the finding of the learned CIT(A) (supra), we find that the contentions of the assessee have been addressed by the learned CIT(A). In our considered view, except for raising these grounds, the assessee has failed to bring .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e contends that the action of the AO in disallowing the short term capital gains (STCL) of ₹ 17,60,242/- is not justified, as he had furnished all the relevant details to establish the genuineness thereof. 8.2 The learned D.R. supported the finding of the learned CIT(A) in the impugned order in disallowing the STCL of ₹ 2,56,787/- out of ₹ 17,60,242/- claimed by the assessee, as no material evidence has been brought on record to controvert the findings of the learned CIT(A) tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

377; 17,60,242/- on the ground that the assessee had submitted all the details in respect of these share transactions of purchase and shares totalling ₹ 9,35,75,657/- (Purchases/Rs.9,18,15,220/- (Sales) which were made out of funds invested with In venture growth with whom assessee had deposited funds out of his savings bank with Corporation Bank, Mandvi, Mumbai and has submitted that the short term capital loss of ₹ 17,60,242/- should be allowed. 6.1.2 It appears from the return of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 0/- available profits. Income from Future & options -1503455 -1503455 Total -966297 (3) Assessee s authorised representative in his submissions filed on 21/1/2014 in paragraph 3(vii)(d) has submitted as follows:- In the paragraph 4.3(d) of the assessment order, the ld AO mentioned about the statement furnished by the appellant showing Short Term Capital Loss of ₹ 17,60,242/-. The appellant submits that, due to an inadvertent mistake, the same was not reflected in the statement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of the business loss of ₹ 15,03,545/- in future and options claimed in the return of income. However, the facts of the case speak otherwise and these are discussed in following paragraphs. 6.1.3 It is quite apparent that assessee had shown business income from trading at ₹ 5,37,158/- without deducting allowable depreciation u/s. 32 of I.T. Act, 1961 of ₹ 77,164/- and loss from the business of futures and options at ₹ 15,03,455/- in the return of income filed on 22/9/200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er. 6.1.4 The transactions in futures and options which resulted in loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- and which was shown as a business loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- in the return of income, were not reflected in the P&L Account and Tax Audit Report which mention only about trading in readymade garments and textiles and only the net profit of ₹ 5,37,157/- is reflected in the P&L Account of the assessee and the so called net loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- in futures and options is also not ref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

payment made by the assessee to this person/party notwithstanding the conclusions arrived at by the AO in paragraph 4.3(g) of the assessment order that assessee has filed a copy of global report indicating the loss on F&O transactions which resulted in loss of ₹ 15,03,455/-. Assessee has not filed any details and documents and evidence regarding these transactions of futures and options which resulted in loss of ₹ 15.03,455/- even though the Assessing Officer in his computation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s outside the books of account and the only possibility is that these transactions relating to the loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- are reflected in the savings bank account with Corporation bank Mulund, Mumbai mentioned in earlier paragraphs of this order and this loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- relating to futures and options is nothing but the short term capital loss of ₹ 17,60,242/- quantified by assessee by mentioning details of futures and options transactions in purchases and sales of shares .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,03,455/- reflected in the computation of total income instead of ₹ 17,60,242/- represents nothing but business loss in futures and options and the same is allowed as per the details furnished by the assessee. It is also held that the alternate contention in the assessee's and his representative s submission that loss of ₹ 17,60,242/- is different from the loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- in futures and options, is also not valid because the entries for the same are not reflected anyw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l income worked out by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order, was nothing but the business loss of ₹ 15,03,455/- in futures and options claimed in the return of income with the difference of ₹ 2,56,787/- (17,60,242 - 15,03,455) was either a component which was not disclosed in the computation of revised loss ₹ 17,60,242/- in the assessment/ appellate proceedings or loss/expenses of ₹ 2,56,787/- which was wrongly claimed. Assessee has failed to furnish the details .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version