Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Laveti Chinasimhachalam and Laveti Venkateswara Rao, Rajahmundry Versus ITO, Ward-3, Visakhapatnam

Penalty u/s 271B - failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - Held that:- We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the requirement of audit u/s 44AB of the Act applies, when the turnover as per the books of accounts exceeds ₹ 40 lakhs. In the present case on hand, on perusal of the facts available on record, we find that the total turnover as per books of accounts of the assessee is less than ₹ 40 lakhs. Therefore the A.O. was not correct in levying the pena .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n hand, the A.O. has estimated the gross profit on unaccounted turnover and also made additions towards unexplained investments in building on estimation basis. The assessee has admitted the additional income during the course of survey proceedings and paid the taxes. The assessee also explained the reasons before the A.O. and requested for immunity from the penalty proceedings. Therefore, when the addition is made on estimation basis and assessee has admitted the additional income to buy peace .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

os.323&324/Vizag/2013, I.T.A.No.325/Vizag/2013 - Dated:- 29-4-2016 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR For The Respondent : Shri K. Ravi, DR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: These appeals filed by the different assessee s are directed against the separate, but identical orders of CIT(A)-11, Mumbai, camp office at Visakhapatnam, dated 22.2.2013 and 15.3.2013 and pertains to the assessment year 2008-09. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was noticed that the assessee is not disclosing his true sale in the books of accounts. It was further noticed that the total sales as on the date of survey, is at ₹ 41,77,097/-, as against this, he had disclosed less turnover in the books of accounts. Therefore, the assessee has been asked to explain the reasons for under admission of sales and also asked to furnish the particulars of total sales for the period from 10.1.2008 to 31.3.2008. In response to the same, the assessee vide lette .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has been completed under section 143(3) and determined total income of ₹ 4,34,364/-. 3. The Assessing Officer issued a show cause notice u/s 271B of the Act and proposed to levy penalty for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Act. The A.O. issued a show cause notice for the reason that the assessee has failed to get his accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Act, though his turnover exceeds ₹ 40 lakhs. Therefore, asked to explain why penalty u/s 271B of the Act shall not be le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Act. The A.O. further held that the assessee turnover for the year under consideration is above ₹ 40 lakhs, which was confirmed by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings, therefore, the contention of the assessee that the turnover for the year under consideration is less than ₹ 40 lakhs has not been accepted. Since, the assessee failed to get is accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Act, invoked the provisions of section 271B of the Act and levied penalty of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. When the turnover as per the books of accounts is less than ₹ 40 lakhs, the requirement of audit u/s 44AB of the Act does not arise. The CIT(A) after considering the explanations furnished by the assessee confirmed the penalty levied by the A.O. The CIT(A) held that admittedly, the turnover of the assessee exceeds ₹ 40 lakhs and hence, provisions of section 44AB of the Act attracted. Since the assessee has not filed the audit report as per law, penalty u/s 44AB of the Act attracte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er exceeds ₹ 40 lacs as per books of accounts. Since, the turnover is less than ₹ 40 lacs as per books, audit report is not obtained from an accountant. Therefore, the A.O. was not correct in levying penalty u/s 271B of the Act. On the other hand, the Ld. D.R. strongly supported the order of the CIT(A). 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. The A.O. levied penalty u/s 271B of the Act for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Act. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nto total turnover exceeds ₹ 40 lakhs, the same has not been recorded in the books of accounts in the absence of necessary sales bills and hence the question of audit u/s 44AB of the Act does not arise. We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the requirement of audit u/s 44AB of the Act applies, when the turnover as per the books of accounts exceeds ₹ 40 lakhs. In the present case on hand, on perusal of the facts available on record, we find that the total .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the assessee Sri L. Chinasimhachalam is engaged in the business of trading in textiles. The assessee has filed his return of income for the assessment year 2008-09 on 7.9.2009 declaring total income of ₹ 93,890/-. A survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 9.1.2008. During the course of survey operation, the assessee has admitted unaccounted turnover of ₹ 9,76,056/- and also admitted additional income of 12.5% on such unaccoun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ditional income of ₹ 6,66,000/- towards unexplained investment towards cost of construction. Subsequently, the case has been selected for scrutiny assessment. After due consideration of explanation filed by the assessee, the A.O. has completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act and made additions of ₹ 1,22,007/- towards 12.5% gross profit on unaccounted turnover, unexplained investments of ₹ 6,66,000/- and cash gift of ₹ 2 lakhs. 9. The A.O. initiated penalty proceeding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

levied the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act towards additions made on account of unaccounted sales and cash gift, however not levied any penalty towards unexplained investments in construction of building. 10. Aggrieved by the penalty order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that at the time of survey, there was a deficit stock of ₹ 7 lakhs and he has agreed to offer income of 7% on the deficit stock. However, the A.O. has arrived .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onstruction of building and towards cash gift. The assessee further submitted that the additions made on account of estimation of turnover and estimated cost of construction does not amounts to concealment of income. Though he had admitted the lapses during the course of assessment proceedings, the same has been accepted with a request to not to levy penalty for concealment of income. Therefore, requested to delete the penalty levied by the assessing officer. 11. During the course of appellate p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee filed his written submission and contended that he has admitted additional income of ₹ 6,66,000/- towards unexplained investment in construction of building and the source for the investment is explained before the A.O. The assessee further submitted that he has admitted additional income during the course of survey, with an honest understanding that no penalty will be levied. The assessment was made on compromised basis. He had accepted all the additions made by the A.O. to buy pea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y and directed the A.O. to levy penalty in respect of unexplained investment in construction of building. Aggrieved by the CIT(A) order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 12. The Ld. A.R. submitted that the CIT(A) was erred in enhancing the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Ld. A.R. further submitted that the A.O. has made additions on estimation basis. All the 3 additions are made on estimation basis, therefore, this is not a case of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs of income. The A.O. was of the opinion that the assessee has concealed the turnover and also made unexplained investment in construction of building. The A.O. further opined that the assessee has not disclosed cash gift of ₹ 2 lakhs given to his brother. Therefore, opined that it is a fit case for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It is the contention of the assessee that he has neither concealed the particulars of income nor furnished inaccurate particulars of income, as the A. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version