Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s SGK Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Versus CST, Delhi

2016 (6) TMI 76 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Entitlement for rebate claim - Notification No. 11/2005-ST dated 19/04/2005 - facilitating sale of coal for a UAE based company and for such arranging a client in Singapore - category of service rendered is not clear - no taxable service rendered in the taxable territory of India - services, if any rendered were consumed by company in UAE - Held that:- the tax paid by the appellant is apparently not attributable to any taxable activity as held in the impugned order. If that be so, irrespective o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

refund. The refund in consequence of this direction shall also be considered for payment of interest as per the applicable law. - Appeal allowed by way of remand - Service Tax Appeal No. 422 of 2012 (SM) - Final Order No. 51863/2016 - Dated:- 23-5-2016 - SHRI B. RAVICHANDRAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Anil Sood, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri G.R. Singh, Authorized Representative (DR) ORDER PER. B. RAVICHANDRAN :- The appellant is aggrieved from order dated 16/11/2011 of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ued under Rule 5 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Their claim was rejected by the Original Authority by his order dated 13/8/2010 on various grounds. Among other things he held that the category of service rendered by the appellant is not clear; the condition that the service should be used outside India is not satisfied and the receipt of consideration in foreign currency is not fully established. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order held as below :- 5. From the ab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the introduction of Section 66A is also of no help to the appellant. Section 66A, readwith the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006, specifies the conditions wherein the services, provided by the service providers situated outside India to the recipient of services located in India, will be taxable in the hands of the recipient of services. In the instant case, the service provider is located in India and the recipient of service is located out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the service recipient is in UAE. He further submitted that while the Original Authority rejected their claim on various grounds, the first Appellate Authority categorically found that the services rendered by the appellant were not at all taxable. However, instead of allowing their claim for refund he held that the appellant is debarred on merit in view of non-applicability of Export of Service Rules, 2005. 3. The learned AR submitted that the first Appellate Authority has not given his finding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version