GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 162 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (6) TMI 162 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Demand of service tax - Period of limitation - Business Auxiliary Service and Business Support Service - Appellant received commission paid by banking and insurance companies, subvented commission to its customers and provided infrastructural support services for which having received some amount not discharged tax liability - Held that:- the issue of discharge of service tax liability on the commission received from the financial institutions and the ins .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the authoritative judicial pronouncement, the demand is barred by limitation. The impugned order is set aside. - Decided in favour of appellant - Appeal No. ST/462/2010 - A/87296/16/STB - Dated:- 13-4-2016 - Shri M V Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Hon ble Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Shri D.H. Nadkarni, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri B. Kumar Iyer, Superintendent (AR) ORDER Per M. V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. P-III/VM/110/10 d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its customers and provided infrastructural support services for which having received some amount not discharged tax liability. 4. It is the argument of the learned counsel that on merits the issue is covered against the appellant by the larger bench decision in the case of Pagariya Auto Centre 2014 (33) STR 506 (T-LB). At the same time he would submit that the question of limitation of the demand of the tax liability has not been addressed by the lower authorities in correct perspective. He wou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ission received by the appellant. He would submit since the show cause notice is dated 21/10/2008, the entire demand is hit by limitation. 5. The learned departmental representative reiterates the findings of the lower authorities and submits that the audit party of the Commissionerate does not look into the entire records to come to a conclusion that they have considered all the angles. It is the submission that the mandate for the audit party is very limited and the appellant having not declar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version