Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hikal Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Bangalore-I

2016 (6) TMI 196 - CESTAT BANGALORE

Condonation of delay - 235 days - applicant was totally unaware about the non-filing of the appeal as the matter was being looked after by the Corporate Office at Mumbai and also the concerned person dealing with the Excise matter left the organization in November 2014 - Held that:- where the delay caused in filing the present appeal is not deliberate and intentional and has been caused on account of the circumstances that applicants were not aware of the non-filing of the appeal before the Hon’ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ousand only) within a period of six weeks from today and submitting the compliance report. - Delay condoned - E/COD/20921/2015 in E/21739/2015-DB - Misc. Order No: 20164/2016 - Dated:- 11-5-2016 - Shri S.S Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Ashok K. Arya, Technical Member For the Appellant : Shri Pradyumna G.H, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Pakshi Rajan, AR ORDER The appellant has filed a miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay of 235 days from the due date on the ground that ano .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e facility who was entrusted with the work of attending to notices, appeals and similar issues pertaining to Customs, Central Excise and VAT had left the organization during November 2014 without informing either the Management at Bangalore or the Corporate Office, Mumbai about the present appeal. In this regard copy of the e-mail dated 24.11.2014 addressed by the said Senior Manager informing about her last day with the company is enclosed. As a result, the applicants were not aware of the non- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elay of 235 days was caused which was not deliberate and intentional. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was totally unaware about the non-filing of the appeal as the matter was being looked after by the Corporate Office at Mumbai and also the concerned person dealing with the Excise matter left the organization in November 2014. He also submitted that the applicant does not stand to gain anything by filing the appeal beyond the period of limitation therefore he has p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version