Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Coffee Board Versus Commissioner of Service Tax Bangalore

2016 (6) TMI 236 - CESTAT BANGALORE

Condonation of delay - 178 days - Impugned order passed on 27.02.2015 was issued on 08.05.2015 but the same was sent to the applicant which was received by one Shri Mahesh who was Class D employee of the applicant who was medically not fit and was un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

without intimating to the applicant - Held that:- the delay has not been caused deliberately and intentionally and therefore we condone the delay subject to the appellant paying the cost of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only). - Delay condone .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

kar, AR ORDER The applicant/appellant has filed an application seeking condonaton of delay of 178 days in filing the present appeal. The ground on which the condonation is sought is that the impugned order which was passed on 27.02.2015 and was issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndergone treatment in the Department of Neurosurgery of M.S. Ramaiah Institute of Neorosciences, Bangalore between 03.06.2014 and 07.07.2014 and thereafter he joined his duty but continued to have loss of memory now and then. Though the order was rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de impression that orders have not been passed and the applicant received intimation vide letter dated 20.10.2015 and then he came to know that the order has been passed and thereafter he rushed to the Department to seek a copy of the order and got t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itted that the applicant is a Board constituted under Section 4 of the Coffee Act of 1942 and is a part of the Central Government, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. He also submitted that the applicant does not stand to gain any benefit by filing th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version