Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (6) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Cenvat credit on material like cement, angles, channels, electrodes, CTD Bars and H.R. Plates. Ld. - denial of claim on the ground that all these materials are for general purpose, structural items used for carrying out civil engineering work and therefore could not be treated as accessories of machines installed in the factory - extended period of limitation invoked - Held that:- In the present case channel, angles, H.R. Plates, welding electrodes were u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uilding construction therefore credit on CTD bar and cement is not admissible. As regard limitation in respect of credit taken on CTD bars and Cement, since appellant have not disclosed the fact about use of these material to the department, it amounts to suppression of facts therefore the extended period is rightly invoked.

In case of Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Ghaziabad Vs. M/s. Rathi Steel and Power Ltd [2015 (5) TMI 168 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] held that there is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llowed. Adjudicating authority shall re-quantify the demand and penalty and interest commensurate to re-quantified amount of demand. - Decided in favour of assessee in part. - Appeal No. E/1377, 1381/10 - Dated:- 22-2-2016 - Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) For the Petitioner : Shri. Vinod Awtani, C.A. For the Respondent : Shri. H.M. Dixit, Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) ORDER PER : RAMESH NAIR These two appeals are directed against Order-in- Appeal No. VSK/57& 58/Th-I/2010 dated 26/3/2010 pass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l purpose, structural items used for carrying out civil engineering work and therefore could not be treated as accessories of machines installed in the factory. It was also contended that longer period is invokable as the appellant has suppressed the fact of availing Cenvat credit on these ineligible items. 3. Shri. Vinod Awtani, C.A. appearing on behalf of appellant submits that as regard the items namely cement, angles, channels, electrodes, CTD Bars and H.R. Plates submits that these items we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n-Original dated 27/12/2007 where credit was allowed. Department has accepted order allowing credit and not filed any appeal therefore credit on angle, channel, HR Plates was wrongly disallowed. As regard welding electrodes, he submits that this also used for fabrication of plant and machinery within the factory of the appellant therefore used as part of capital goods. He submits that as regard the Cenvat credit on CTD Bars and cement, it is his submission that these items were used for making f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se and Service tax Appellate Tribunal [2015-TIOL-1734-HC-MAD-CX] (e) Mundra Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs[2015-TIOL-1288-HC-AHM-ST] (f) ACC Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur [2009(237) ELT 573(Tri. Mumbai)] (g) G.M.R. Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. Visakhapatnam-I[2009(241) ELT 388(Tri. Bang.)] He also submits that the issue of Cenvat credit on these items is debatable right from beginning and various conflicting judgm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

submission that it is settled law that once any show cause notice is issued, second show cause notice on the same issue cannot be issued for longer period for this reason also demand in Appeal No. E/1377/10 almost time bar. In Appeal No. E/1381/10 since issue involved is of interpretation of admissibility of the Cenvat credit and the matter was referred to the larger bench, demand in this case also time bar. He placed reliance on the following judgments: (a) M/s. Megafine Pharma Pvt Ltd Vs. Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xcise, A.P.[2008(9) S.T.R. 314(S.C.)] 4. Shri. H.M. Dixit, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that all the subject goods are in the nature of either civil construction material or supporting structural steel. He submits that in the Larger Bench judgment of Vandana Global Ltd(supra) Tribunal has held that steel items used for supporting structural are neither input nor capital goods, he further relied upon the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

epartment. In appeal No. E/1381/10 by order in original dated 30/3/2007 items used for the same purpose, credit was disallowed. I further found that in view of the Honble Supreme Court judgment in Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd(supra) credit was allowed on material used for fabrication of Chimney that shows that if steel items is used for fabrication/manufacture of Capital goods credit should be allowed. On the same analogy in the present case channel, angles, H.R. Plates, welding ele .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version