Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Leo Oils & Lubricants Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai

Eligibility for cash refunds of untilized credit - credit could not be unutilized 16 years back due to dispute with the department - appellant is now an SSI unit and their clearance are very much within the limits prescribed under the SSI. - credit under transitional provisions - Rule 57H of erstwhile CER 1944 - Held that:- it is very clear that the appellants were prevented from taking of credit due to the objections from the department and the contention of the appellant that had the departmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

)] which has been upheld by the Supreme Court in UOI Vs Slovak India Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. [2007 (1) TMI 556 - SUPREME COURT] supports the appellant's contention that they are eligible for cash refund as it was not due to appellant's fault or lapse in availing the credit. Had the department not objected to their availment, their need to have paid the amounts through PLA would have been drastically reduced. The authorities below have lost sight of the fact that cenvat credit is a beneficial legis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts (appellant) was manufacturing Lubricating Oil falling under Chapter 2710 out of raw materials received from M/s IBP Ltd., who in turn received the same from M/s Indian Oil Corporation. There was a dispute with regard to availment of credit for the period from 2.3.94 to 18.4.94 to the tune of ₹ 2,89,487/- on gate passes issued prior to 1.4.1994. There was also a dispute with regard to availment of credit to the tune of ₹ 8,13,816/-. Further there was denial of credit taken to the t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of ₹ 56,68,245. Balance amount of ₹ 54,06,249 was ordered to be recovered and the credit allowed as early as on vide Order-in-Original No.13/96 dated 6.2.96 to the tune of ₹ 8,13,816 was ordered to be adjusted against the above demand of ₹ 54,06,249. After further rounds of litigation at various level, the issue on merits viz. availability of MODVAT credit based on the endorsed invoices / gate passes, was decided in favour of the Appellant vide Order-in-Appeal No.47/201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itled for the entire credit. He however rejected the refund claim of ₹ 11,03,202 as per Rule 57H(7) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and read with Rule 11(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. He further held that the said amount of credit is not a refund amount either for payment made in excess or any pre-deposit by the assessee at any point of time. 3. On further appeal, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No.21/2011 (M-I) dated 19.9.2011 upheld the order o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of the duty paid on the inputs in the year 1994 due to the objections raised by the Range officials which got settled only during 2010 vide OIA No.47/2010 (M-I) dt. 4.8.2010 in favour of the appellant; that had the department granted refund in 1994 itself there would have been no necessity for the appellant to have made payment by cash in PLA and therefore question of lapsing of credit would not arise; that since the appellant is availing cenvat credit exemption under Notfn 8/2003, they are un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ranchi Vs Ashok Arc 2006 (193) ELT 399 (Jhar.); that decision of the Hon'ble High Court would prevail the decision of the Tribunal's LB. The appellant had also filed a written synopsis and list of dates of events. 5. Shri L. Paneerselvam, A.C, Ld. A.R appearing on behalf of Revenue reiterated the findings in the OIA and submitted that appeal merits to be dismissed as the decision of the Tribunal's LB is clearly in favour of the Revenue. The Ld. AR requested for filing of written subm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lized towards adjustment on the inventory or would lapse if credit was lying unutilized as per Rule 57H (7) of CER 1944 superseded by introduction of CCR 2004. The appellant's reliance on Hon'ble High Court order in UOI Vs Slovak India Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. - 2003 (201) ELT 559 (Kar.) does not speak about accumulation of credit due to export under Rule. This order need not be relied upon. In any event, the said decision of Hon'ble High Court was distinguished and the appeal filed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it is very clear that the appellants were prevented from taking of credit due to the objections from the department and the contention of the appellant that had the department granted refund in the year 1994 itself, the appellant would not have made the payment by cash from the PLA and due to the dispute being not settled for 16 years, the appellant cannot be denied of their benefit to cash refund. The appellant is now an SSI unit and their clearance are very much within the limits prescribed u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r dated 30th April, 2002. The stand of the learned Counsel for the Revenue that the amount should have been adjusted in RG-23A Part-II account cannot be accepted, there being no such RG-23 Part-II account available respect of the finished goods. Similar issue was decided by Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Deccan Sales Corporation, reported in 1982 (10) E.L.T. 885, as noticed by the CEGA Tribunal and, in fact, no credit account is being maintained by the respondent on account of raising .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e facts were that respondent, M/s.Slovak India Trading Co.Pvt. Ltd. was engaged in the manufacture of shoes and they had surrendered their registration and filed refund application for ₹ 4,15,057/-. The High Court had observed that the admitted facts would reveal of a claim of cash refund and that refund cannot be rejected when the assessee goes out of the modvat scheme or when the company is closed. The argument that there is no provision for refund in terms of Rule 5. The observation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version