TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 361X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pre-deposit amount for the appeal to be heard on merits - Held that:- this court set asides the impugned order of the CESTAT as well as the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The sum of ₹ 2 lakhs deposited by the Appellant shall be treated as being in compliance of the pre-deposit order of Commissioner (Appeals), which will stand modified to that extent. Resultantly, the Appellant’s appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upholding the order dated 19th August, 2013 of the Commissioner (Appeals), Delhi-II which rejected the appeal by Appellant against the original Adjudication order dated 9th May, 2013 raising the service tax demand of ₹ 10,00,698/- along with the interest and penalty for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09. 5. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the Appellant s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r a pre-deposit amount for the appeal to be heard on merits. 8. In that view of the matter, this court set asides the impugned order dated 26th October, 2015 of the CESTAT as well as the order dated 19th August, 2013 of the Commissioner (Appeals). The sum of ₹ 2 lakhs deposited by the Appellant shall be treated as being in compliance of the pre-deposit order dated 15th July, 2013 of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
