GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2016 (338) E.L.T. 715 (Mad.) - Condonation of delay - 405 days - Imposition of duty and personal penalty - Held that:- the said order certainly is prejudicial to the interest of the appellant. Though, while dismissing the condonation petition, CESTAT, Chennai Bench, has observed that there is no justifiable cause, going through the reasons assigned, it could be seen that the appellant has not offered a detailed explanation. Also the Tribunal has observed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e event of dismissal of the applications filed to condone the delay and following the principles of law enunciated in the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are inclined to condone the delay of 405 days in filing the appeal before CESTAT on condition that the appellant pays costs of a sum of ₹ 2,500/- in each of the appeals to My Lord the Hon'ble Chief Justice's Relief Fund, within a period of three weeks. - Decided in favour of appellant - CMA Nos. 754 and 755 of 2016, CMP Nos. 618 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the final orders in Nos.41234/2015 and 41235/2015, respectively, instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeals viz., CMA Nos.754 and 755 of 2016, are filed. 2. Assailing the correctness of the impugned orders, Mr.L.J.Vengatesh, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that before CESTAT, Chennai Bench, imposition of duty and personal penalty of ₹ 10,37,673/-, were challenged. 3. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, though the order dated 10.09.2013 passed in Appeal Nos.121 and 122 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appeals in time. That apart, the appellant was outside the country between 27.09.2013 and 10.02.2014. Again, he had to leave the country and he came back only on 26.07.2014. Citing the abovesaid reasons, Mr.L.J.Vengatesh, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though sufficient cause for not making the application within the period of limitation, was shown and when the Courts have consistently held that while testing the correctness of the reasons, on the sufficient cause shown, Cour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d 10.09.2013. 5. Attention of this Court was also invited to a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Esha Battacharjee Vs. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and Others, reported in (2013) 12 SCC 649 and other decisions referred to in the memorandum of grounds. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the appellant also submitted that the department's appeal was condoned, with a delay of more than 1000 days. 6. Per contra, inviting the attention of this Court to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er in Appeal Nos.121 and 122 of 2013 dated 10.09.2013, duty and personal penalty of ₹ 10,37,673/- have been imposed. Certainly that said order prejudices the interest of the appellant. Though, the copy of the order is stated to have been received by the tenant of the appellant on 05.11.2013, contentions have been raised that it has been misplaced by them. The appellant has also stated that there was some dislocation of residence and his mother had passed away on 10.02.2014. Before CESTAT, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

adly be culled out are; 21.1. (i) There should be a liberal, pragmatic, justice-oriented, non-pedantic approach while dealing with an application for condonation of delay, for the courts are not supposed to legalise injustice but are obliged to remove injustice. 21.2. (ii) The terms sufficient cause should be understood in their proper spirit, philosophy and purpose regard being had to the fact that these terms are basically elastic and are to be applied in proper perspective to the obtaining fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould not affect public justice and cause public mischief because the courts are required to be vigilant so that in the ultimate eventuate there is no real failure of justice. 21.7. (vii) The concept of liberal approach has to encapsulate the conception of reasonableness and it cannot be allowed a totally unfettered free play. 21.8. (viii) There is a distinction between inordinate delay and a delay of short duration or few days, for to the former doctrine of prejudice is attracted whereas to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pproach. 21.10. (x) If the explanation offered is concocted or the grounds urged in the application are fanciful, the courts should be vigilant not to expose the other side unnecessarily to face such a litigation. 21.11. (xi) It is to be borne in mind that no one gets away with fraud, misrepresentation or interpolation by taking recourse to the technicalities of law of limitation. 21.12. (xii) The entire gamut of facts are to be carefully scrutinised and the approach should be based on the parad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the condonation petition, CESTAT, Chennai Bench, has observed that there is no justifiable cause, going through the reasons assigned, it could be seen that the appellant has not offered a detailed explanation. For brevity, paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 of the reasons assigned in the supporting affidavit to Appeal Nos.E40662 & E40663 of 2015, are extracted hereunder. 4. All the Appellant Directors of the company searching for their survival which dislocated their residence from the normal address, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version