GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 416 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 416 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - 2016 (43) S.T.R. 89 (P & H) - Imposition of Cost on adjudicating authority - Payable to Prime Minister's National Relief Fund - Held that:- the Tribunal had recorded that the analysis of the adjudicating authority was nothing but verbatim reproduction of the submission of the appellant and no finding was recorded about the taxability of services and the analysis/discussions/findings of the adjudication are very shoddy. It had been highly and con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the order in question. No illegality or perversity could be pointed out in the aforesaid findings recorded by the Tribunal which may warrant interference by this Court. - Decided against the Revenue - STA No. 2 of 2016 (O&M) - Dated:- 11-4-2016 - MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. & MRS. RAJ RAHUL GARG. JJ. For the Appellant: Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Advocate with Ms. Seema, Advocate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. Delay of 59 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. 2. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(ii) Whether direction to deposit cost into the PM National Relief Fund is proper when it is not voluntary? 3. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The respondent was issued three show cause notices, first for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10 and the subsequent two notices for the periods 2010-11 and 2011-12 for demanding service tax amounting to ₹ 60,11,37,341/-, ₹ 47,24,64,597/- and ₹ 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he present appeal. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 5. The Tribunal had recorded that the analysis of the adjudicating authority was nothing but verbatim reproduction of the submission of the appellant and no finding was recorded about the taxability of services and the analysis/discussions/findings of the adjudication are very shoddy. It had been highly and conspicuously nonspeaking, non-reasoned, arbitrary and cavalier while passing the order dated 28.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version