Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 433 - DELHI HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 433 - DELHI HIGH COURT - 2016 (337) E.L.T. 510 (Del.) - Import of second hand cars mis-declaring them as new - Eligibility for grant of benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs dated 1st March 2002 - Settlement Commission has granted the benefit of notification and immunity from the penalty and prosecution - Held that:- by giving the proximity of the date of manufacture and the date of import of the car, it cannot be said that the said car ceased to be a new car and became a 'sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Petition disposed of - W. P. (C) 3629/2016 & CM 15537/2016 - Dated:- 1-6-2016 - S. Muralidhar And Vibhu Bakhru, JJ. For the Petitioners : Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate ORDER 1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence ( DRI ) and the Commissioner of Customs, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively is whether the Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission ( CCESC ) is justified in allowing the application filed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion; penalty of ₹ 75,000 and ₹ 20,000; and granted immunity from the prosecution to the Respondent. 2. Background facts to the present writ petition are that the DRI, Delhi Zonal Unit, New Delhi received information regarding a syndicate of persons including one Mr. Jatin Ahuja fraudulently importing high end luxury cars on a large scale from various foreign clients by mis-declaring these cars as new cars whereas such cars were sold and registered in the country of export prior to b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d 24th August 2009 in the name of Respondent. The invoice No. 44376 dated 19th August 2009 raised by M/s. A.K. International (IE) Limited, United Kingdom (U.K.) upon the Respondent in respect of the said car was also recovered where the cost, interest and freight ( CIF ) price for the said car was declared as GBF 184842 and the duty was discharged on concessional rate of basic customs duty at 60% by declaring as a new car. 4. Based on the above facts, a show-cause notice ( SCN ) was issued to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

should not be levied; and differential customs duty of ₹ 30 lakhs deposited by M/s. Jay Polychem India Limited during the course of investigation should not be appropriated towards differential duty to the government account. 5. The Respondent then filed a Settlement Application No. 4499-4500/2014 before the Settlement Commission on 19th November 2014. The Respondent admitted the duty liability on account of undervaluation to the tune of ₹ 3,73,298 but it contested the allegation co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

243-244 of 2014 (Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. Rohan Anirudha Seolekar) where the question involved again concerns the import of a vehicle which had been registered in the U.K. prior to its import and whether the Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 1st March 2002 would be applicable. It is pointed out that the issue in the present petition is under consideration by the Supreme Court in the above SLP (C) No. 243-244 of 2014, and therefore, the issue arising in the present petition should be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat case was not prepared to accept the case of the DRI that the purchaser of the car had acted in connivance with the importer and he was aware of all the facts at the time of import. It was held that the Department had failed to discharge its prima facie onus of showing the involvement of the purchaser of the car with its importer. The Court s attention has also been drawn to the decision of the High Court of Bombay in Commissioner of Customs (Import) & Noshire Moody 2014 (300) ELT 205 (Bo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

09, previous owner was Graypaul Motors Ltd. Society, Nottingham and purchasing date was 27.07.2009, previous owners end date 17.08.2009 and the current owner was Gurpal Chawla K.S. Farm, Rajokri 122001 and purchase date 17.08.2009. These details indicate that the car was manufacture on 23.07.2009 and after its manufacturer it was sold to M/s. Graypaul Motors Ltd., Society Nottingham on 27.07.2009 who subsequently sold it on 17.08.2009 to Shri Gurpal Chawla, K.S. Farm, Rajokri. The said report do .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version