Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 440 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2016 (6) TMI 440 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Reversal of cenvat credit taken on the inputs imported and subsequently re-exported - Held that:- The goods which are exported do not suffer the duty incidence. Keeping this view in mind, we do not find it appropriate to make a distinction between goods which are exported under ARE-1 procedure on payment of duty under claim for rebate, and those which are exported under bond without payment of duty/reversing the credit under Rule 3(5). Both sets of goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/2012 & Appeal No.E/41877/2014 - Final Order No.40833-40835/2016 - Dated:- 20-5-2016 - SHRI D.N. PANDA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRIV.PADMANABHAN, TECHNICAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Shri M. Kannan, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) ORDER PER V. PADMANABHAN Two appeals filed by M/s.Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter known as the appellant-assessee) as well as ONE by the Revenue are being disposed of through this common order since they are centered on the same .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ommissioner (Appeals). The third appeal filed by the appellant-assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 13.5.2014 setting aside the refund paid for a subsequent period. 2. The appellant-assessee imported certain inputs on which they availed cenvat credit. Subsequently, a portion of these inputs were cleared for export bond under Rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. At the time of export, they did not reverse an amount equal to the cenvat credit availed. The Reve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.R for the Revenue. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant-assessee submitted that CBEC had clarified vide Circular dt. 31.12.1996 that the manufacturer who has taken Modvat credit can export the goods under bond without payment of duty and this facility was available as per the excise procedure. Therefore, there is no bar on the manufacturer to remove inputs/capital goods in terms of Explanation under Rule 18 (2). This clarification has been reiterated in the subsequent Boards circular dt.29 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioner. He contended that Rule 3 (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not make any distinction between domestic clearance and export clearance and in both if the goods are removed as such, the appellant-assessee has to reverse the credit and therefore in this case also it should be reversed. However, he fairly admits that in case the same goods are exported after reversing the credit, appellant-assessee will be eligible for grant of rebate of the duty paid. 6. It is not in dispute that inputs impo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version