New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2016 (6) TMI 553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Rate of land adopted for the period prior to 1981 for computation of long term capital gain - correct value to arrive at cost of indexation - Held that:- CIT(A) on perusal of the report of survey map submitted before him observed that assessee’s land has locational advantage with regards to the roads, civic amenities like schools, hospitals, offices, markets etc. Transportation in the form of auto-rickshaws and buses is available. Further, the land was o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f lesser advantages at ₹ 18/- sq. mtr. in vicinity and also considering the facts and circumstances, CIT(A) rightly estimated the value of the land at ₹ 25/- per sq. mtr. as against the value adopted by the Assessing Officer at ₹ 2.23/- per Sq. mtr. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer was directed to adopt the value of the land at ₹ 25/- per sq. mtr. and compute the long term capital gain. Thus, this reasoned finding of CIT(A) need no interference from our side. We uphold .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

011, the Revenue has taken following grounds of appeal:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(Appeals) has deleted addition of ₹ 1,10,90,848/- made by the A.O. as the A.O. had not adopted the correct value to arrive at cost of indexation. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(Appeals) has failed to appreciate that the valuation reports do not refer to situation of surroundings present during the year 1981 or earlier a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acts and in circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in adopting the fair market value of the land sold by the assessee as on 1.4.1981 at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. against ₹ 40 per sq. mtr. claimed by the assessee on the basis of report from a registered valuer furnished before the Assessing Officer. 3. Assessee had, during the year under consideration, sold agricultural land bearing Survey No. 46/1/3/1 admeasuring about 3 hectors and land bearing Survey No. 37 admeasuring about 6 hectors .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ort as claimed by assessee. However, Assessing Officer did not accept the cost (fair market value) adopted by assessee and recomputed the capital gains chargeable to tax. The capital gains computed by Assessing Officer stood ₹ 3.17 crores break-up of which is as under: Particulars As per Asstt. Order Sale consideration 3,28,47,500 Less: Indexed Cost of acquisition 10,86,189 2,09,286 x 519 100 (Rs.2.23 per sq. mtr. X 93850 sq. mtr. = 2,09,286 Capital Gain chargeable to Tax 3,17,61,311 3.1 T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

009 the Sub-Registrar, Administration, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa, had intimated that the prevailing rate at Rakholi Village as on 1.4.1981 was ₹ 2.23 per sq. mtr. (iv) That the appellant's brother had adopted ₹ 18 per sq. mtr. being fair market value as on 1.4.1981 for computing capital gain in respect of sale of agricultural land. (v) That, since no valuation report of a Registered Valuer had been filed the rate as indicated by the Sub- Registrar, Administration, Dadra an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee made various contentions. Having considered the same, CIT(A) has restricted the value of land at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the Long Term Capital Gain accordingly. 5. Same has been opposed before us by both parties; Revenue by way of its appeal and assessee by way of its Cross Objection. Ld. D.R. supported the order of Assessing Officer and submitted that there is no basis for CIT(A) to take value of land at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. On the other han .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

p; Nagar Haveli, Silvassa while adopting the rate of land @ 2.23 per sq. mtr. This letter was not confronted to the assessee. The claim of Revenue is that the rate of such land has been arrived at after taking into consideration the prevailing rate in the entire Village of Rakholi. Ld. counsel for the assessee disputed the content of the letter from the Revenue Department, D & NH relied on by the Assessing Officer was not confronted to assessee. He submitted that a copy of the letter from th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder: (i) the AO had made addition on account of capital gains on the basis of information received from the office of sub-Registrar, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa and accordingly had taken cost of land @ ₹ 2,23 per Sq.mt. The legality of this process^ is not challenged by the appellant and only the rate of valuation is subject matters of appeal. Though the Assessing Officer then could have confronted this information with the appellant but it appears due to lack of time it was not done .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

377; 40/- Per Sq. Mt. includes cost of land leveling work etc. The Valuation Report was prepared after the inspection of the site has been done by Shri Jayesh K. Dalal on 11.12.2009 and by Shri Talsi Lakhani, the other valuer on 23.01.2010. The AO also contended in the RR that the reports do not refer to the situation of surroundings present during the year 1981 or earlier. So the reports cannot be accepted at all. (iii) The appellant has also taken the case of Shrikant K. Barve, for A.Y. 2006-0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent that the appellant is trying to justify his valuation @ ₹ 40/-per Sq. Mt. However, it is also clear that the Assessing Officer has duly valued the land @ ₹ 2.23 Per Sq. Mt. and this also deserves merit". 6.1 The matter before us is with regard to rate of land adopted by the Assessing Officer for the period prior to 1981 for computation of long term capital gain. The Assessing Officer relied on the letter from the Revenue Department D&NH for arriving at the rate. Assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version