Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Shri Bhaskar Krishnaji Barve (HUF)

Rate of land adopted for the period prior to 1981 for computation of long term capital gain - correct value to arrive at cost of indexation - Held that:- CIT(A) on perusal of the report of survey map submitted before him observed that assessee’s land has locational advantage with regards to the roads, civic amenities like schools, hospitals, offices, markets etc. Transportation in the form of auto-rickshaws and buses is available. Further, the land was on the main road and has its own potential. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r. in vicinity and also considering the facts and circumstances, CIT(A) rightly estimated the value of the land at ₹ 25/- per sq. mtr. as against the value adopted by the Assessing Officer at ₹ 2.23/- per Sq. mtr. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer was directed to adopt the value of the land at ₹ 25/- per sq. mtr. and compute the long term capital gain. Thus, this reasoned finding of CIT(A) need no interference from our side. We uphold the same. - ITA. No. 821/Ahd/2011, C.O. No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds of appeal:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(Appeals) has deleted addition of ₹ 1,10,90,848/- made by the A.O. as the A.O. had not adopted the correct value to arrive at cost of indexation. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(Appeals) has failed to appreciate that the valuation reports do not refer to situation of surroundings present during the year 1981 or earlier and has considered the same. 2.1 In C.O. No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A) erred in adopting the fair market value of the land sold by the assessee as on 1.4.1981 at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. against ₹ 40 per sq. mtr. claimed by the assessee on the basis of report from a registered valuer furnished before the Assessing Officer. 3. Assessee had, during the year under consideration, sold agricultural land bearing Survey No. 46/1/3/1 admeasuring about 3 hectors and land bearing Survey No. 37 admeasuring about 6 hectors at Village near Rakholi on 19th May, 2006 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing Officer did not accept the cost (fair market value) adopted by assessee and recomputed the capital gains chargeable to tax. The capital gains computed by Assessing Officer stood ₹ 3.17 crores break-up of which is as under: Particulars As per Asstt. Order Sale consideration 3,28,47,500 Less: Indexed Cost of acquisition 10,86,189 2,09,286 x 519 100 (Rs.2.23 per sq. mtr. X 93850 sq. mtr. = 2,09,286 Capital Gain chargeable to Tax 3,17,61,311 3.1 The Assessing Officer made impugned additio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa, had intimated that the prevailing rate at Rakholi Village as on 1.4.1981 was ₹ 2.23 per sq. mtr. (iv) That the appellant's brother had adopted ₹ 18 per sq. mtr. being fair market value as on 1.4.1981 for computing capital gain in respect of sale of agricultural land. (v) That, since no valuation report of a Registered Valuer had been filed the rate as indicated by the Sub- Registrar, Administration, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa of ₹ 2.23 p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

idered the same, CIT(A) has restricted the value of land at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the Long Term Capital Gain accordingly. 5. Same has been opposed before us by both parties; Revenue by way of its appeal and assessee by way of its Cross Objection. Ld. D.R. supported the order of Assessing Officer and submitted that there is no basis for CIT(A) to take value of land at ₹ 25 per sq. mtr. On the other hand, ld. Authorized Representative submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he rate of land @ 2.23 per sq. mtr. This letter was not confronted to the assessee. The claim of Revenue is that the rate of such land has been arrived at after taking into consideration the prevailing rate in the entire Village of Rakholi. Ld. counsel for the assessee disputed the content of the letter from the Revenue Department, D & NH relied on by the Assessing Officer was not confronted to assessee. He submitted that a copy of the letter from the said Revenue Department dated 11.02.2010 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unt of capital gains on the basis of information received from the office of sub-Registrar, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa and accordingly had taken cost of land @ ₹ 2,23 per Sq.mt. The legality of this process^ is not challenged by the appellant and only the rate of valuation is subject matters of appeal. Though the Assessing Officer then could have confronted this information with the appellant but it appears due to lack of time it was not done. This does not terms the addition made by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d leveling work etc. The Valuation Report was prepared after the inspection of the site has been done by Shri Jayesh K. Dalal on 11.12.2009 and by Shri Talsi Lakhani, the other valuer on 23.01.2010. The AO also contended in the RR that the reports do not refer to the situation of surroundings present during the year 1981 or earlier. So the reports cannot be accepted at all. (iii) The appellant has also taken the case of Shrikant K. Barve, for A.Y. 2006-07 as a comparable case wherein the departm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y his valuation @ ₹ 40/-per Sq. Mt. However, it is also clear that the Assessing Officer has duly valued the land @ ₹ 2.23 Per Sq. Mt. and this also deserves merit". 6.1 The matter before us is with regard to rate of land adopted by the Assessing Officer for the period prior to 1981 for computation of long term capital gain. The Assessing Officer relied on the letter from the Revenue Department D&NH for arriving at the rate. Assessee also relied on the letter from the same R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version