Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mohamed Ansar Abdul Gafoor, Mohamed Rishad, Mohamed Rafeek Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Customs

2016 (6) TMI 657 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Detention of imported Gold Jewelery - adjudicating authority had given an option of redemption to the petitioners for re-export subject to payment of fine and personal penalty. - Held that:- in the instant case there is no proof to show that the revision petitions have been taken on file and no proof has been produced to show that notice has been ordered to the petitioner. That apart, the order of the Commissioner was passed on 30.06.2015 and the revisions are said to have been presented only on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or Respondent in all WPs : Mr.V.Sundareswaran, SC ORDER Heard Mr.A.Ganesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent and with their consent, these Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. In all these three writ petitions, the petitioners have sought for a direction to release the goods which have been detained pursuant to the order passed on 03.06.2015 by which the concerned adjudicating authority had gi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not accepted the order and they have filed revisions, however the proof of filing such revision is not readily placed before the Court. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Department submitted that since the Department has filed revisions before the Central Government, the Central Government may be directed to dispose of the revision petition within a time frame and the jewels may not be permitted to be redeemed for reexport. In support of his contention, learned standi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as well as penalty. This order was passed by the Commissioner of Appeals on 30.06.2015. It is stated that revisions have been preferred before the Government on 16.02.2016/05.03.2016 along with application for interim relief. However, till date no notice has been issued to the petitioner in such revisions nor there is any proof before this Court to show that the revisions have been taken on file. 4. So far as the decision in Aiyakannu's case was concerned, that was a case where the foreign .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version