Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Reaselack Polymers Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Nagpur

2016 (6) TMI 664 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Valuation - Demand of duty on 3% commission given to through whom goods were supplied to the customers - Held that:- We find that this fact is not under dispute that 3% service charge was billed to M/s. MSSIDC in their commercial invoices in addition to the value shown in the excise invoices therefore it is apparent that 3% service charge was escaped from payment of excise duty. As regard claim of the appellant that the said amount is in form of commission which was passed on to M/s. MSSIDC, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

except to agree with the lower authority - Decided against assessee - Appeal No. E/73/07-MUM & Application No. E/MA(ORS)/95305/15 - Final Order No. A/85419/2016-WZB/EB And Misc. Order No. M/85420/2016-WZB/EB - Dated:- 12-1-2016 - MR. RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND MR. RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri. P. V. Sadavarte, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri. R.K. Maji, Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) ORDER PER : RAMESH NAIR This appeal and Misc. application is directed against Order-i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the consumers of M/s. MSSIDC. They are raising excise invoices and paying excise duty on the value declared in the said invoices. Simultaneously, they are raising commercial invoices wherein 3% commission was charged in addition to the value shown in the excise invoices. The department has demanded duty on the said 3% service charge billed to M/s. MSSIDC. 4. Shri. P. V. Sadavarte, Ld Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that this 3% service charge is nothing but a commission a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ss to produce such documents on the ground that management is changed and old records are not traceable. However, he produced one letter dated 1st March 2006 on that basis he submits that the price of the goods as per the rate contract finalized by M/s. MSSIDC, therefore this 3% service charge should not be included in the assessable value. 5. Shri. R.K. Maji, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that appellant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Recapitulation:

Recent / Latest:
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version