Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.C.E. Indore Versus Man Industries India Ltd.

2016 (6) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Assessable value - Revenue entertained a view that the transport expenditure of the bare pipes from the respondent premises to the job worker premises is to be added in the assessable value - Held that:- In the present case the goods were removed fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the job worker is in accordance with law, there is no ground for any addition towards freight. In view of the above finding on fact by the ld. Commissioner, we find no ground to interfere with the said impugned order. In the grounds of appeal the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the respondents are discharging duty on contract price, there is no merit in the present appeal. - Decided against revenue - Excise Appeal No.E/2645/2006-EX [DB] - Final ORDER NO. 51818/2016 - Dated:- 26-2-2016 - S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndents are engaged in the manufacture of steel spirally welded pipes liable to Central Excise Duty. They were supplying cement coated M.S. Pipes on contract price to M/s. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. The spirally welded pipes are cleared from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e bare pipes from the respondent premises to the job worker premises is to be added in the assessable value. Accordingly, demand proceedings were initiated. On conclusion of the proceedings, the Original Authority vide his order dated 23.01.2006 conf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evenue is before us. 2. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the provisions of Rule 5 would apply only when the goods are not sold at the factory gate but are being sold at a place other than the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r payment of duty and such value adopted for coated pipes from the premises of the job worker is in accordance with law, there is no ground for any addition towards freight. In view of the above finding on fact by the ld. Commissioner, we find no gro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version