Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s Shakun Advertising Pvt. Ltd.

2016 (6) TMI 684 - ITAT JAIPUR

Unaccounted investment in house property - Addition on the basis of statement recorded U/s 132(4) - rejection of books of account U/s 145(3) - Held that:- Additional income of ₹ 1.00 crore, which includes disclosure of ₹ 75 lacs on account of unaccounted investment in house property constructed at 4-5, Shubham Enclave, C-Scheme, Jaipur. The addition made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of statement recorded U/s 132(4) are not on the basis of incriminating documents found during .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ster and commission payment not verifiable but no specific bills vouchers have been referred by the Assessing Officer that the expenses claimed and commission paid is bogus on the basis of seized material. Whatever addition made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of statement recorded during the course of search U/s 132(4) which have evidentiary value but it is rebuttable. The CBDT also issued instruction on forced disclosure during the survey and search, which has been referred by the ld CIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, A. M. This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order dated 04/01/2013 of the learned C.I.T.(A) (Central), Jaipur for A.Y. 2009-10. The effective grounds of appeal are reproduced as under:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld CIT(A), Central, Jaipur, despite confirming the rejection of books of account U/s 145(3) of the IT Act, has erred in reducing the disallowance of ₹ 2 Cr made by the AO to ₹ 10,57,940/-thereby allowing relief of ₹ 1,89,42 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ore making the addition, including the fact of disclosure made by the assessee, its failure to adduce evidence to substantiate expenses of much higher amount and specific facts in respect of certain concerns, payments to whom were admittedly used by the assessee to inflate expenses. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Id. CIT(A) has erred in appreciating the fact that the disallowances made u/s 37(1) of the I.T. Act was proper and in accordance with the provisions of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d return on 29/09/2009 declaring total income of ₹ 1,68,38,070/-. The ld Assessing Officer observed that a search/seizure was conducted on 06/8/2008 in the case of Shakun Group of Jaipur to which the assessee belongs. Various assets/books of account and documents were found and seized as per annexure prepared during the course of search. Accordingly, notice U/s 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) was issued by the Assessing Officer on 30/01/2009 for the assessment year 2003 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Assessing Officer at ₹ 2.00 crores and deleted by the ld CIT(A). The ld. Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had declared advertisement purchases of ₹ 43,80,83,444/- against advertisement sales of ₹ 45,27,70,370/-. In addition to this administrative expenses of ₹ 1,13,99,630/- which includes consultancy charges, sales promotion and travelling expenses. These expenses were incurred on purchase of advertisement sites, making of hoarding, installment and commissio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

omous bodies, news papers/news channels and claimed purchase of material for fabrication of the display board items. The assessee was asked to furnish the bifurcation of expenses to get them verified with the help of bills and vouchers and other records maintained by the assessee. The ld Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had not maintained stock register itemwise and site-wise. It is not ascertainable that expenses claimed were with reference to revenue generated. The requisite details .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ose of our audit. 2.1 On this basis/defects pointed out by the Assessing Officer, he proposed to rejection of books of account U/s 145(3) of the act. He further held that statement of Shri Ballabh Das Maheshwari recorded during the search U/s 132(4) of the Act on 07/8/2008. In reply to question Nos. 13 and 14, he had admitted that expenses had been inflated in their concerns namely Shakun Advertising Pvt. Ltd., N.S. Publicity Agencies, SGM Communication and M/s Lead etc.. The ld. Assessing Offic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SC). (iii) Assam Pesticide and Agro Chemicals Vs. CIT 227 ITR 846 (Gau). He further observed that Shri Ballabh Das Maheshwari during the search in reply to question No. 9, surrender of ₹ 2.97 crores on account of inflated expenses outstanding in the books, out of which a surrender of ₹ 1.00 cores was alone made. Further it was mentioned that persons owing M/s Sixth Sense Communication and Kritika Advertisement, Mumbai were dummy concerns in the name of an employee of the assessee and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve mentioned concerns. Besides this, there are number of companies whose names, liability had been shown by the assessee, which has been tabulated on page 7 of the assessment order. The total such parties were identified 12 in numbers. It is further held that this list of bogus persons was only an illustration not exhaustive. Required confirmation had not been submitted during the assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer. These expenses recoded in the books of account are remained to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r consideration on account of unaccounted investment in house property constructed at 4-5, Shubham Enclave, C-Scheme, Jaipur. The income offered to tax of ₹ 1.00 crore to take care of the unaccounted investment in said house property. Since the assessee had claimed that surplus fund generated on account of booking bogus expenses were applied for investment in construction of house property. Thus, he made addition of ₹ 2.00 cores in the income of the assessee. 3. Being aggrieved by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed during the course of search. The appellant even confronted that statement of one Director was recorded by the search team by stating wrong fact of alleged statement of one Shri Ravi Chapperwal of M/s Sixth Sense Communications recorded during survey at their premises at Mumbai inasmuch as Shri Chapperwal clearly admitted that his concern was provided services to the appellant company but in a particular question, answer was recorded in a manner as Shri Chapperwal was admitted that no services .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on of expense and surrender of income of ₹ 2.97 crore was recorded in the background wrong facts of statement of Shri Chapperwal. However, there is no doubt for dispute on the issue that in respect of A.Y. 2009-10 as regards the specific surrender of ₹ 2.97 crores on account of inflation of expenses there was no specific surrender of ₹ 2.97 crores on account of inflation of expenses and there was no specific sized record for any other relevant material to support such surrender .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(Raj)(HC). (iv) Sh. Dhanraj Soni Vs ACIT, Bikaner, Jaipur Bench ITA No. 1722/JP/1994 dated 22/07/1996. (v) M/s Maheshwari Industries Jodhpur Vs ACIT, ITA No. 845/JP/95 dated 06/10/2003. (vi) Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs ACIT (2009) 120 ITD 301. He further referred CBDT Instruction No. 286/2003-IT(Inv) dated 10/3/2003 wherein it has been clarified that while recording the statement during the course of search operation, no attempt should be made to obtain the confession as to undisclosed income. In a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the order of the Assessing Officer and argued that the statement recorded U/s 132(4) has evidentiary value under the Income Tax Act. This group has surrendered additional income on account of inflated expenses, therefore, this year also, the assessee should honour the disclosure made by the Director of the company during the course of search. Number of incriminating documents were found during the course of search, on which this disclosure was made but later of the assessee had retracted part .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed any services to M/s Shakun Advertising P. Ltd. and that wrong facts were stated before the Director of the company Shri Ballabh Das Maheshwari for obtaining forced surrender of income. As soon as these facts came to notice of Sh. Chapperwal, he immediately filed an affidavit and retraction letter before the ADIT, Jaipur. The affidavit filed by Sh. Chapperwal has not been controverted by the ld. Assessing Officer. The copy of retraction letter and affidavit had been filed before the ld CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oose papers and documents found at the business premises at Delhi, Mumbai and Ahmadabad as he was not able to get verification from the regular books of account from the family members and business concerns. However, in return, he has admitted additional income of ₹ 1.00 crore, which includes disclosure of ₹ 75 lacs on account of unaccounted investment in house property constructed at 4-5, Shubham Enclave, C-Scheme, Jaipur. The addition made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version