Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s HEG Limited (Sponge Iron Division) Versus C.C.E. Raipur

2016 (6) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Cenvat credit taken on the disputed goods - demand raised - Held that:- As per the unambiguous definition of capital goods contained in Rule 2(a)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the disputed goods shall be considered as input in terms of Rule 2(a) of the said rules for the purpose of the cenvat benefit. As find the goods when used for manufacture of machines installed in the factory shall be eligible for cenvat credit, under the head input. Therefore there is no merit in the impugned order in dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. However, since this particular aspect has not been properly addressed the matter should be remanded back to the original authority for verification of the duty paid documents for ascertaining the fact regarding date of receipt of the capital goods and taking of cenvat credit. - Excise Cross Appeal No. E/Cross/210/2010 ,Excise Appeal No. E/1942/2010-E[SM] - Final Order No. 54000 /2015 - Dated:- 2-11-2015 - Mr. S. K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) For the Appellant : Ms. Sukriti Das (Advocate) For t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Induction furnace, Chimney and Ducts falling under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. According to the Ld. Advocate, since the disputed goods have been used for manufacture of the capital goods falling under chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985, the same should qualify as capital goods for the purpose of availment of cenvat credit in terms of the definition of capital goods contained in Rule 2(a)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. To support her stand that duties p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

invoice No. 128301 dated 09.02.2005, the submission of the Ld. Advocate is that since, the year of receipt of the disputed goods was 2005-2006 and the credit was taken in next financial year i.e. 2007, taking of 100% cenvat credit is in conformity with the cenvat statute. 3. Per contra, Mrs. Kanu Verma Kumar, the Ld. DR for the Revenue reiterates the findings recorded in the impugned order. 4. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. 5. It is an admitted fact tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version