Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

SAJANI JEWELS Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2016 (6) TMI 741 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - Entitlement to exemption under section 10AA - applicability of Section 69C - bogus purchases - Held that:- Even if the expenditure of the so called bogus purchases is disallowed, the only effect it could have is to increase the profit of the assessee which in any case is exempt under section 10AA of the Act. Section 147 of the Act would be applicable where the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. When this fundame .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ereof or the explanation offered is not satisfactory, the amount covered by such expenditure or the part, as the case may be, would be deemed to be the income of the assessee for such financial year. The present is not a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure, but failed to offer explanation about the source of such expenditure. The source of expenditure in question was very much available since in the reasons recorded itself, the Assessing Officer points out that the purchases were ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

DHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arose in similar background. They have been heard together and would be disposed of by this common judgment. For convenience, facts may be noted from Special Civil Application No.17935 of 2015. Petitioner is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and export of diamond studded jewelery. Petitioner's manufacturing unit is situated in the Special Economic Zone and the e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The petitioner challenged the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal by order dated 14.09.2011. The petitioner's further appeal to Tribunal was however, allowed by an order dated 20.07.2012. The entire exemption under section 10AA of the Act was granted. We are informed that the Revenue challenged such order of the Tribunal in Tax Appeal No.898 of 2012, which was dismissed on 06.03.2013. 3. To reopen the scrutiny assessment previously framed, the As .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f bogus concerns controlled either by him or his close associates who were only namesake proprietors/partners/directors. The said concerns were providing bogus sale entries (Purchase entry to the beneficiary entitles) for which they used to receive cheque. After that, cash was paid to the beneficiary entities after deducting commission etc. He had also provided a list of the said bogus concerns wherein the name Maridian Gems has been appeared. Such dummy partners' statement on oath was also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rther the statements of Bhanwarlal Jain and other associated persons were also not available with the Department which is crucial documentary proof of such bogus entry. Hence, entire bogus accommodation entries of the said purchases have escaped assessment. Thus, the assessee has accommodated bogus entires of above said purchases, which cannot be allowed. Thus, in the case of the assessee, income to that extent has escaped assessment on account of bogus accommodation entries of purchases. In vie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted 10.09.2015. 5. On the basis of such facts, learned counsel for the petitioner raised following contentions. I. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer do not demonstrate any independent application of mind by her. Such reasons mechanically adopt the exercise undertaken by the investigating wing of Income tax department. In support of this contention, counsel relied upon following decisions. • In case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax4 v. G & G Pharma India Ltd., passed by Hon& .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 10AA of the Act. Therefore, even if the Revenue's theory of bogus purchases by the assessee is established, the same can only result into disallowance of business expenditure, thereby increasing the assessee's profit. This in any case would have no tax implication since even such additional income would be exempt under section 10AA of the Act. In support of this contention, counsel relied upon following decisions. • In case of Baijnath Saboo and others v. IncomeTax Officer,  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le to tax had escaped assessment. II. There was total non disclosure on part of the assessee of the illicit transactions of bogus purchases. Reopening of assessment even beyond period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year would therefore, be permissible. III. Counsel contended that additional income arising out of such bogus transactions would not qualify as business income and therefore, would not be exempt under section 10AA of the Act. He submitted that as held by this court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Bench of this Court in case of Yogendrakumar Gupta v. IncomeTax Officer, reported in 366 ITR 186. 7. Regarding the first contention of the counsel for the petitioner, we have perused the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for issuing notice for reopening. We have also perused the original file produced by the department. Relevant documents from the file were also shown to the counsel of the petitioner. In the reasons recorded itself, the Assessing Officer has noted that search and seizur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urchaser after retaining commission. Bhanwarlal Jain had also provided list of such bogus entities, one of them being Meridian Gems. The reasons further record that the assessee had also accepted bogus accommodation entries for purchase of goods worth ₹ 90.17 lacs from said Meridian Gems in order to inflate the purchases. 8. We notice that under letter dated 16.07.2014, the investigation wing of the income tax department had placed the entire report of said investigation alongwith importan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e issuance of notice of reopening have to be those of the Assessing Officer alone. This however, does not mean that the Assessing Officer cannot rely on the exercise undertaken by other wings of the Government departments, if the material so collected through inquiry or investigation provides primafacie information, a tangible material; which enables the Assessing Officer to form a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. There is nothing to prevent the Assessing Officer from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plied or shown to have been applied. The same may be gathered from the reasons recorded and other contemporaneous material on record. In this context, we are satisfied that it was the decision of the Assessing Officer, based on the materials collected by the investigation wing that she recorded the reasons to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, which led her to issue notice of reopening. 9. The second contention of the counsel for the petitioner that there was no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax exempt, even if the stand of the department as reflected in the reasons recorded is correct and ultimately established, there would be no additional tax burden on the petitioner. To put it simply, the question being posed is where is the escapement of income chargeable to tax ? 11. In this context, we may revisit the modus operandi adopted by the petitioner as alleged by the department. According to the department, the petitioner had shown purchases of goods worth ₹ 90.17 lakhs from o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct, all that would be done even if the assessment is permitted, is to disallow the expenditure of ₹ 90.17 lacs. Correspondingly, the income of the assessee would increase by the said sum of ₹ 90.17 lacs. However, if the entire income is exempt under section 10AA of the Act, there would be still no tax implication. With this background in mind, we had noted the history of petitioner's claim for exemption under section 10AA of the Act while recording facts. The assessee having succ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version