Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

SAJANI JEWELS Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Reopening of assessment - Entitlement to exemption under section 10AA - applicability of Section 69C - bogus purchases - Held that:- Even if the expenditure of the so called bogus purchases is disallowed, the only effect it could have is to increase the profit of the assessee which in any case is exempt under section 10AA of the Act. Section 147 of the Act would be applicable where the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. When this fundame .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ereof or the explanation offered is not satisfactory, the amount covered by such expenditure or the part, as the case may be, would be deemed to be the income of the assessee for such financial year. The present is not a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure, but failed to offer explanation about the source of such expenditure. The source of expenditure in question was very much available since in the reasons recorded itself, the Assessing Officer points out that the purchases were ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

DHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arose in similar background. They have been heard together and would be disposed of by this common judgment. For convenience, facts may be noted from Special Civil Application No.17935 of 2015. Petitioner is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and export of diamond studded jewelery. Petitioner's manufacturing unit is situated in the Special Economic Zone and the e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The petitioner challenged the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal by order dated 14.09.2011. The petitioner's further appeal to Tribunal was however, allowed by an order dated 20.07.2012. The entire exemption under section 10AA of the Act was granted. We are informed that the Revenue challenged such order of the Tribunal in Tax Appeal No.898 of 2012, which was dismissed on 06.03.2013. 3. To reopen the scrutiny assessment previously framed, the As .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f bogus concerns controlled either by him or his close associates who were only namesake proprietors/partners/directors. The said concerns were providing bogus sale entries (Purchase entry to the beneficiary entitles) for which they used to receive cheque. After that, cash was paid to the beneficiary entities after deducting commission etc. He had also provided a list of the said bogus concerns wherein the name Maridian Gems has been appeared. Such dummy partners' statement on oath was also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rther the statements of Bhanwarlal Jain and other associated persons were also not available with the Department which is crucial documentary proof of such bogus entry. Hence, entire bogus accommodation entries of the said purchases have escaped assessment. Thus, the assessee has accommodated bogus entires of above said purchases, which cannot be allowed. Thus, in the case of the assessee, income to that extent has escaped assessment on account of bogus accommodation entries of purchases. In vie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted 10.09.2015. 5. On the basis of such facts, learned counsel for the petitioner raised following contentions. I. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer do not demonstrate any independent application of mind by her. Such reasons mechanically adopt the exercise undertaken by the investigating wing of Income tax department. In support of this contention, counsel relied upon following decisions. • In case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax4 v. G & G Pharma India Ltd., passed by Hon& .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 10AA of the Act. Therefore, even if the Revenue's theory of bogus purchases by the assessee is established, the same can only result into disallowance of business expenditure, thereby increasing the assessee's profit. This in any case would have no tax implication since even such additional income would be exempt under section 10AA of the Act. In support of this contention, counsel relied upon following decisions. • In case of Baijnath Saboo and others v. IncomeTax Officer,  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le to tax had escaped assessment. II. There was total non disclosure on part of the assessee of the illicit transactions of bogus purchases. Reopening of assessment even beyond period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year would therefore, be permissible. III. Counsel contended that additional income arising out of such bogus transactions would not qualify as business income and therefore, would not be exempt under section 10AA of the Act. He submitted that as held by this court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Bench of this Court in case of Yogendrakumar Gupta v. IncomeTax Officer, reported in 366 ITR 186. 7. Regarding the first contention of the counsel for the petitioner, we have perused the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for issuing notice for reopening. We have also perused the original file produced by the department. Relevant documents from the file were also shown to the counsel of the petitioner. In the reasons recorded itself, the Assessing Officer has noted that search and seizur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urchaser after retaining commission. Bhanwarlal Jain had also provided list of such bogus entities, one of them being Meridian Gems. The reasons further record that the assessee had also accepted bogus accommodation entries for purchase of goods worth ₹ 90.17 lacs from said Meridian Gems in order to inflate the purchases. 8. We notice that under letter dated 16.07.2014, the investigation wing of the income tax department had placed the entire report of said investigation alongwith importan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e issuance of notice of reopening have to be those of the Assessing Officer alone. This however, does not mean that the Assessing Officer cannot rely on the exercise undertaken by other wings of the Government departments, if the material so collected through inquiry or investigation provides primafacie information, a tangible material; which enables the Assessing Officer to form a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. There is nothing to prevent the Assessing Officer from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plied or shown to have been applied. The same may be gathered from the reasons recorded and other contemporaneous material on record. In this context, we are satisfied that it was the decision of the Assessing Officer, based on the materials collected by the investigation wing that she recorded the reasons to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, which led her to issue notice of reopening. 9. The second contention of the counsel for the petitioner that there was no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax exempt, even if the stand of the department as reflected in the reasons recorded is correct and ultimately established, there would be no additional tax burden on the petitioner. To put it simply, the question being posed is where is the escapement of income chargeable to tax ? 11. In this context, we may revisit the modus operandi adopted by the petitioner as alleged by the department. According to the department, the petitioner had shown purchases of goods worth ₹ 90.17 lakhs from o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct, all that would be done even if the assessment is permitted, is to disallow the expenditure of ₹ 90.17 lacs. Correspondingly, the income of the assessee would increase by the said sum of ₹ 90.17 lacs. However, if the entire income is exempt under section 10AA of the Act, there would be still no tax implication. With this background in mind, we had noted the history of petitioner's claim for exemption under section 10AA of the Act while recording facts. The assessee having succ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

News: Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters

News: Clarification about Transition Credit

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version