TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 776X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e the impugned order and remand the matter to the adjudicating authority for deciding appellants liability as also quantification of the tax required to be paid by them in the light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of L&T Ltd. (2015 (8) TMI 749 - SUPREME COURT) - Matter remanded back. - Application No. ST/STAY/54654/2014-ST(DB), Appeal No. ST/54109/2014-ST(DB) - Final Order No. 51231/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellant did not reply to the various communications of the Revenue proceedings were initiated against them for proposing confirmation of demand of service tax on the entire contracted value. The said proceedings stands culminated into the present impugned order confirming tax along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty. 3. Ld. Consultant submits that the period involved in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . 4. Ld. AR appearing for the Revenue submits that the matter needs to be re-examined by the Adjudicating authority in the light of the declaration of the law by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of L T Ltd. (Supra) as also by examining each and every contract entered into by the appellant with the service recipient. 5. Without further going into the details of the submission made before ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
