Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

LATE CHUNIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI DALWADI Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2016 (6) TMI 981 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - higher stamp valuation - assessment in the hands of legal heir of deceased assessee - Held that:- We do not find that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. It appears that the assessee had declared the sale consideration of the land in question as ₹ 87.71 lacs where as had accepted the stamp valuation which would come to ₹ 2.12 crores considering the stamp duty of ₹ 11.92 lacs affixed on the sale deed. It was in this backg .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

: MR SN DIVATIA, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has challenged the notice of reopening dated 28.2.2014 issued by respondent Assessing Officer, copy of which is produced at AnexureA to the petition. This petition arises in the following background. The assessee is the legal heir of late Chunibhai Ranchhodbhai Dalwadi. For the assessment year 2007-2008, the assessee had filed return of income declaring t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

diad on 19/04/2006 vide registration no. NDD/1310/01/55. Registration charges paid on the above agreement is ₹ 1,32,205/- and stamp duty paid is ₹ 11,92,500/- . As per above Stamp Duty the sale value is determined at ₹ 2,12,86.400/- by the Stamp Authority. However, the Agreement is made for ₹ 87,71,765/- only. Hence as per the provisions of S.50C, the deemed LTCG is Rs.l,25,14,635/- , which has not been offered for tax by the assessee in the return of income filed for A.Y .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essment officer may go on and the petitioner to participate in the same without prejudice to his rights and contentions in the present petition and by way of adinterim relief, it is directed that final order, if any passed, may not be implemented till the next date of hearing. Direct service is permitted today. 4. We are informed that the order of assessment is also passed. However, by subsequent directions dated 6.4.2015, which continued from time to time, the department is precluded from enfor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bad in law. He further contended that the notice for reopening was issued against deceased Chunibhai Ranchhodbhai Dalwadi and thus there was no valid issuance of service of notice. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel Shri Parikh for the department submitted that the assessee had made major misdeclarations concerning the nature of land under sale and its true sale consideration. He submitted that sale deed was not on record and, therefore, the assessing authority had no means to ascertain the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be now allowed to raise orally. 7. Regarding the validity of reassessment proceedings, we may recall the Assessing Officer in his reasons had stated that the assessee had sold immovable property vide sale deed dated 19.4.2006. The sale value declared was ₹ 87.71 lacs (rounded off). However, the sale deed was registered with the SubRegistrar, Nadiad on 19.4.2006 on which registration charge of ₹ 1.32 lacs(rounded off) and stamp duty of ₹ 11.92 lacs (rounded off) was paid. He th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment. It appears that the assessee had declared the sale consideration of the land in question as ₹ 87.71 lacs where as had accepted the stamp valuation which would come to ₹ 2.12 crores considering the stamp duty of ₹ 11.92 lacs affixed on the sale deed. It was in this background, the Assessing Officer invoked section 50C of the Act treating the difference as deemed long term capital gain. When these facts were not on record, when the sale deed was not on record during the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mission has been made to indicate that the land in question was agriculture land. You have submitted 7/ l2 extracts along with this letter dated 23/03/2015. The Banakat as submitted during the assessment proceedings specifically contains that the land in question was agreed to be sold at ₹ 87,71,765/- out of which an amount of ₹ 17,87,454/- received as Banakat and the assessee would not claim anything more than the agreed consideration. However, it is to bring to your notice the term .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

akat the possession of the NA land was given to the purchasers, thus completing the sale and transfer of the land. Hence, the land in question purchased was NA land and accordingly the stamp registering authority had rightly applied the rates for NA land at the time of execution of the sale deed. In view of the above, the stamp rates charged by the Stamp Authority was for NA land and the sub registrar accordingly worked out the document value as ₹ 2.12,86,400/- . Thus. from the above it be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version