GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (6) TMI 987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

2016 (6) TMI 987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - [2016] 92 VST 303 (Kar) - Restriction in input tax credit - deduction of input tax in excess of 2% of the tax - KAT - returns were to be discarded and the re-assessment was to be undertaken - Held that:- It is hardly required to be stated that even if the return of the assessee is discarded resulting in a process of re-assessment, the Assessing Officer further needs to examine the permissibility of the input credit and if permitted, then to what extent. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

J. For the Appellant: Sri Harish V.S., Advocate For the Respondent: None JAYANT PATEL J., J U D G M E N T Admit. 2. Mr.Vedamurthy, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent waives notice of admission . 3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on both sides, appeals are finally heard. 4. The present appeals are directed against order dated 30/11/2015, passed by the Addl. Commissioner of C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f accounts were also filed. On 4/7/2011, the Assessing Officer passed the revised order of assessment. On 1/8/2011, the appellant preferred an application for rectification of mistake, requesting to allow the input tax credit at 3% as against 4%. The application was rejected vide order dated 9/8/2011. The appellant carried he matter in appeal before the first appellate authority and the said authority, vide order dated 29/3/2012, all owed the appeal and accordingly, deduction of input tax in exc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the appellant and Mr.Vedamurthy, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 8. The principal contention advanced on behalf of the appellant was that the reasons are recorded to deal with the contention that whether input tax credit should be made permissible to the extent of 2% or 4% even if the returns were to be discarded and the re-assessment was to be undertaken. It was also submitted that again st the same assessee, the very revisional authority had passed order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, relying upon the reasons recorded at paragraph No.7 of the impugned order contended that this is not a matter on par with the earlier matters considered by this court in STA.Nos.6/2016 and allied matters, wherein no reason whatsoever were recorded by the revisional authority, but in the present case, reasons are recorded at paragraph No.7 of the impugned order. He submitted that the ground canvassed by the learned counsel for the appellant is erroneous. 10. However, when it was put .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

restricting the input tax credit to the extent of 2%. At this stage, we may also record that in the impugned order, at paragraph No.5, the revisional authority has reproduced the contents of the reply filed on behalf of the assessee and in the said reproduction of the reply at paragraph Nos.20 to 22, it is mentioned as under: 20. Further we submit that except Commissioner, other departmental authorities has no power to change the application of the formula, as prescribed under sub-r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

able under law. Therefore we hereby request your good self to kindly drop the proceedings. 22. In addition to the above we further submit that, as per section 11(a)(5) read with Section 14 of the Act, input tax should be restricted to that extent of 2% towards inputs which are attributable to goods stock transferred outside the State. If such inputs are not ascertainable on account of common use of inputs for both sales of taxable goods and goods stock transferred to outside the Stat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

12-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version