Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Bhushan Steel Ltd. Versus The Commissioner, C&CE, Visakhapatnam

2016 (6) TMI 1068 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

Import of metallic waste and scrap - The consignment was accompanied by a Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate(PSIC) issued by Asia Globe Trade Ltd Hong Kong which is an agency authorized for whole of USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, UK, Malaysia, UAE, Mozambique Kuwait, Singapore and European Union. It appeared that M/s Asia Globe Trade Ltd was not authorized to issue pre-shipment inspection certificate with regard to Norway. - Held that:- there is no prohibition against import of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R No. A/30016/2016 - Dated:- 30-12-2015 - Ms.Sulekha Beevi C.S. Judicial Member Shri S.C.Choudhary, Consultant for the Appellant Shri Prasad, AR for Respondent ORDER [Order per: Ms.Sulekha Beevi ,C.S] 1. The appellant challenges the confiscation of imported shredded scrap and imposition of penalty for want of valid pre-shipment inspection certificate. 2. The appellants imported shredded scrap from Norway. As per para 2.32 of the Hand Book of Procedures, in the case of import of metallic waste an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thorized to issue pre-shipment inspection certificate with regard to Norway. According to the Public Notice No.38(RE.2012) 2009-2014 dated 18-12-2012 issued by DGFT no inspection agency is specified for goods originating from Norway. The appellants were asked to furnish valid PSIC. They then requested for conduct of post shipment inspection by an authorized agency listed by DGFT, India for the purpose of clearance of cargo. The goods were unloaded and post inspection was conducted at Visakhapatn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the goods would fall within the ambit of prohibited goods being liable for confiscation. The appellant was given an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of ₹ 22,00,000/- and the order also imposed penalty of ₹ 5,00,000/-. Aggrieved the appellant is before the Tribunal. 3. The learned Consultant appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant had substantially complied the condition of furnishing a PSIC. The agency which issued PSIC is an agency listed and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s an agency listed for almost all the countries including European union. The only defect is that Norway is not listed among the countries mentioned. He placed on record the judgments laid in Commissioner Vs Moolchand Steels(P)Ltd. 2008(224) ELT 57(Gug), Commissioner of Custom Vs Senor Metals(P)Ltd 2009(236) ELT 447(Guj). NGA Steels(P)Ltd. Vs C C Chenai 2010(262) ELT 578(Trti.Chennai), Shri Shakti Iron and Steel Re-rolling mills Vs C C Kandla 2014(304) ELT 279(Tri-Ahmd)Samer Industries Vs C C Ka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been compiled by the appellants , the goods would fall within the definition of prohibited goods. That therefore, the goods were rightly confiscated and the redemption fine and penalty imposed is reasonable and justified. 5. I have gone through the records and considered the rival submissions carefully. In the impugned order the Commissioner, has observed that the goods on examination was found to be in conformity with the conditions stipulated in Foreign Trade Policy, except for the non-product .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee with this argument put forward by the department. Merely because Norway is not listed in the Public Notice, it cannot be said that there is complete restriction for import of goods from Norway. As per the policy Circular No.19/2004-09, dated 18-02-2005 of DGFT, it is clarified that on furnishing a declaration, the agency authorized for inspection can have its branch offices included and listed in the Handbooks of Procedures. It needs to be repeated that Asian Globe Trade Ltd. is an agency aut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version