Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Osho Gears & Pinions Ltd. Versus CCE, Ludhiana

2016 (6) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

Confirmation of redemption fine and penalty - Held that:- In this case the charge against the appellant is that the goods were lying in their factory in finished condition without entry in RG-1 register. Therefore, plea of the learned Counsel for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Present for the Appellant : Shri Vikrant Kackria, Advocate Present for the Respondent : Shri K. Poddar, AR ORDER The appellant is in appeal against confirmation of redemption fine of ₹ 2.75 lakh and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orded in the RG-1 register. The production in charge and excise clerk could not give reasonable explanation during the course of investigation as to why these finished goods in packed condition were not accounted. Therefore, the goods were seized. Fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

back for replacement. These goods were unaccounted for in their statutory records and they were to clear the same as scrap. As these goods were unaccounted for nor the cenvat credit involved in this case were reversed, the same were cleared as scrap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rules. The adjudicating authority held that the goods have been rightly put under seizure as the same were deliberately not entered in their records with an intention to clear the same clandestinely and they were liable for confiscation and gave opti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he adjudicating authority. Aggrieved with the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that as the appellant got manufactured the goods from the job worker under job work challan and these goods were rece .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version