Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Gap International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle 10 (1) , New Delhi

Transfer pricing adjustment - valid remuneration model for benchmarking the TP adjustment - cost plus form of remuneration v/s commission based remuneration - Held that:- As relying on assessee’s own case qua the assessment years 2006- 07 and 2007-08 and case from Li & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT [2011 (9) TMI 204 - ITAT, New Delhi] wherein remuneration model of markup of 5% on the operation cost without considering the value of the cost procured by the AE directly from the third party vendors .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld that:- TPO has not made a fair analysis of the comparables, though chosen by the assessee in its TP study for the AY 2007-08, rather relied upon his own finding for the earlier years which have undisputedly been set aside by the Tribunal. So, we are of the further opinion that the ld. TPO to benchmark international transactions afresh by examining the suitable comparables by providing opportunity of being heard to the assessee. So, file is ordered to be restored to the TPO to benchmark the in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

perty, the business would not have been started even and as such, allowable for deduction - ITA No.1077/Del./2016 - Dated:- 17-5-2016 - SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Assessee : S/Shri Rahul K. Mitra, Vinay Verma, Ashish Jain, Adity Anand and Ms. Neeti Satija, CAs For The Revenue : Shri Amit Mohan Govil, CIT DR ORDER PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, Gap International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ken by the Appellant does not satisfy the arm's length principle envisaged under the Income-tax Act 1961 ('the Act'). In doing so, the Ld. DRP and consequently the Ld. AO (following the directions of the Ld. DRP) have grossly erred in enhancing the income of the Appellant by INR 3,265,301,3351- on account of the Transfer Pricing ('TP') adjustment u/s 92CA(3) of the Act made by the Ld. TPO by ; 1.1 ignoring the decision of Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT&# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and thereby ignoring that the Appellant neither creates supply chain or human intangibles nor bear any significant risks with respect to its business operations; 1.3 ignoring the fact that Hon 'ble ITA T has blessed the business model of the Appellant by accepting the application of 'Cost Plus' remuneration model followed by it; and 1.4 ignoring the fact that Hon'ble IT A T in A Y 2009-10 and A Y 2010-11 has upheld the mark-up of 15% applied by the Appellant to be at arm's le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he directions of the Ld. DRP), erred on facts and in law in upholding the Ld. TPO's approach of including the value of the goods sourced directly by the AEs of the Appellant from third party vendors in the cost base of the Appellant, for the purpose of computing the arm's length profit margin of the Appellant on the alleged ground that it created supply chain and human asset intangibles in India and generated location savings in India which have not been factored in its prevailing/ curre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Appellant, and thus the Appellant was entitled to a remuneration only with a reference to the value of goods sourced by the AEs from the third party vendors. 5. The Ld. DRP and consequently the Ld. AO (following the directions of the Ld. DRP), erred on facts and in law in disregarding the extensive/ voluminous documents evidencing that all key decisions in the value chain such as selection of vendors, designing of products, establishing parameters of sourcing, establishing quality standards, d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sequently the Ld. AO (following the directions of the Ld. DRP), erred on facts and in law in drawing an adverse inference in terms of Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act and upholding that Appellant has failed to produce the best available evidence available with it. 8. The Ld. DRP and consequently the Ld. AO (following the directions of the Ld. DRP) has completely disregarded the relevant judicial pronouncements which upholds cost plus remuneration for procurement support service providers. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nomic analysis using profit split method without appreciating the fact that the current business model and the functionality of the Appellant company (which has been duly approved by the Hon'ble TTAT in Appellant's own case in 2006-07 and A Y 2007-08) does not involve unique intangibles or transactions that are interlinked which would warrant such an analysis . 11. The Hon'ble DRP and consequently the Ld. AO erred on facts and in law, in enhancing the income of the Appellant by INR 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) on distinguishing facts to hold that one time conversion charges paid by the Appellant to the MCD were capital in nature as it resulted in enduring advantage to the Appellant; 10.2 concluding that the conversion charges paid were for violation of municipal laws, without obtaining! verifying necessary facts / information from the Appellant; 10.3 completely disregarding the fact that such payment was made on account of commercial expediency by the appellant and did not consider favourable decisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. AO erred in initiating penalty proceedings under section 271 (1)( c) read with section 274 of the Act. That the above grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other. That the Appellant reserves its right to add, alter, amend or withdraw any ground of appeal either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal. 3. Briefly stated the facts of this case are : GAP International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of GIS Inc. and its business activities are to facilitat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment, assessee company entered into international transaction as under :- Nature of transaction Method Selected Total value of transaction (Rs.) Provision of sourcing support services TNMM 59,24,41,155 5. Assessee company in its transfer pricing study to benchmark international transaction used Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method with Operating Profit / Total Cost (OP/TC) as Profit Level Indicator (PLI) and worked out its OP/TC at 15.52%. Assessee company chosen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the ALP. TPO further held that in view of the functional profile of the assessee company, which is that of a sourcing agent, it should be compensated in terms of higher commission as assessee company is controlling critical functions, such as, merchandising, fabric sourcing, product integrity, quality assurance, compliance and logistics and major risk arising from the aforesaid functions, such as, poor quality management lies with the assessee company. Assessee s compensation model is based o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lysis of the assessee company and computed ALP of international transaction at ₹ 3,26,53,01,335/-. In pursuance to the order passed by the ld. TPO/DRP, the AO made addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment at ₹ 3,26,53,01,335/- and disallowed the rent expenses to the tune of ₹ 1,75,16,800/-. 7. Assessee carried the matter before the DRP which has dismissed the objections raised by the assessee company. Feeling aggrieved, the assessee company has come up before the Trib .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tudy is as under :- S.No. Name of the company OP/TC 2 IDC (India) Limited 12.57 3 Quadrant Communication Ltd. 9.14 4 Empire Industries Ltd. (Trading & Indenting) 15.81 5 Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. (Consolidated) -0.3 6 Priya International Limited (Indenting) 29.2 13.28 10. Assessee, by using multiple year data, computed the mean margins of the comparable companies at 13.28% as against its own margin at 15.52% and treated its international transactions at arm s length. However, ld. TP .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

supply chain management intangibles; that the assessee owns human assets intangibles; that the compensation model of the assessee does not include the profit attributable to the assessee on account of location savings; and that the assessee s remuneration should be expressed as a percentage of the FOB price of goods sourced through the assessee. Consequently, the ld. TPO held that functional profile of the assessee company apparently proves that it is not a market support service provider and co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mited 7.54 3 Trent Limited -0.12 4 Jaypee Spintex Limited 5.88 AVERAGE 5.33 13. Computation of Arm s Length Price Details Amount in INR Total FOB Value of exports 62,756,195,91 0 Arm's Length margin @ 5.33% 3,344,905,24 2 Margin shown by the assessee 79,603,907 Difference 3,265,301,335 Since the difference between the arm s length margin and the margin shown by the assessee varies by more than 5% of the arms length price has taken place, an adjustment of ₹ 3,26,53,01,335/- is to be mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

DCIT reported in 12 ITR (Trib) 748 relied upon by the TPO to benchmark the international transactions and held that the assessee company was entitled to a cost plus form of remuneration, as claimed by the assessee and not a commission based remuneration. So, in other terms, the assessee company has been declared as a service provider and not being into buy and sell company rather functions as a facilitator only. So, now the profit margin of the assessee is in dispute only in this case. 13. Howev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is the first and foremost to determine the compensation model. 14. However, to repel the argument addressed by the ld. DR, the ld. AR for the assessee simply relied upon the findings returned by the Tribunal in assessee s own case in ITA Nos.5147/Del/2011 and 228/Del/2012 (supra) and further contended that each and every point as to creation of intangibles, location savings, assessee having no human assets intangibles have been set at rest; that the assessee company has been performing normal an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earlier years i.e. 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, which have admittedly been set aside by the Tribunal in ITA Nos.5147/Del/2011 AY 2006-07, 228/Del/2012 AY 2007- 08, 55/Del/2013 AY 2008-09, 692/Del/2014 AY 2009-10 and 577/Del/2015 AY 2010-11. 16. So, by respectfully following the decisions rendered by the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee s own case in AYs 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 and judgment delivered by the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ost of goods sourced from India, rather assessee company is entitled to cost plus remuneration and not a commission based remuneration. 17. Now, the next question arises for determination in this case is as to whether ld. TPO/DRP have correctly benchmarked the international transaction by using appropriate comparables? 18. The TPO selected three comparables with an average OP/OC of 5.33% which has applied on the FOB value of the export and thereby made an adjustment of ₹ 3,26,53,01,335/-. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gins of the comparables are as given below :- S. No. Name of the company OP/OC 1 Pantaloon Retail (India) Limited 8.01 2 Shoppers Stop Limited 7.54 3 Trent Limited -0.12 4 Jaypee Spintex Limited 5.88 AVERAGE 5.33 Accordingly, the arm s length price in your case is calculated as below :- Details Amount in INR Total FOB Value of exports 62,756,195,910 Arm's Length margin @ 5.33% 3,344,905,242 Margin shown by the assessee 79,603,907 Difference 3,265,301,335 The above shortfall of ₹ 326,53 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recording findings that, the Hon ble ITAT erred in completely disregarding the critical functions carried out by the assessee and the consequent risks borne by the assessee and further recorded the finding that even the judgment rendered by the High Court in Li & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. case has not been accepted by the revenue as filing of SLP to the Supreme Court has been suggested as if he was sitting in appeal on the assessee s case of earlier year. 20. So, in the totality of the facts and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o, file is ordered to be restored to the TPO to benchmark the international transactions in the light of the observations made hereinbefore. 21. The next issue arises for determination is as to whether DRP/AO have erred in enhancing the income of the assessee by ₹ 1,75,16,800/- by disallowing the rent expenses being conversion charges paid to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD)? 22. Undisputedly, the assessee company has claimed rent expenses to the tune of ₹ 4,96,35,663/- and f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version