GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 120 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (7) TMI 120 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Waiver of pre-deposit - Input tax credit - petitioner submitted that the Assessing Officer had not given sufficient opportunity to the petitioner and the order of Assessing Officer was passed in great hurry. In any case, there was no material on record to suggest that the petitioner's transactions with Diamond Oil Industries were bogus. Merely because Diamond Oil Industries did not reflect its full sales to the petitioner in the tax returns, would no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pre-deposit condition is modified by providing that the petitioner shall deposit 30 per cent of the principal tax with interest excluding penalty. - Decided partly in favor of petitioner. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6184 of 2016 - Dated:- 24-6-2016 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. A.J. SHASTRI, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : UCHIT N SHETH, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : Mr. Hardik Vora, Assistant GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The petitioner has challenged an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

titioner had claimed to have purchased goods worth ₹ 5.104 crores during such period from Diamond Oil Industries Pvt.Ltd on which the petitioner had claimed input tax credit of ₹ 2.55 crores. The Assessing Officer tried to cross-check such sales made by Diamond Oil Industries, but did not receive reply from the assessing authority of the said seller. The Assessing Officer of the petitioner therefore, checked online returns filed by Diamond Oil Industries and found that ex-facie retur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s purchases from said Diamond Oil Industries and raised a tax demand of ₹ 2.55 crores with interest of ₹ 2.04 crores. He also imposed penalty of ₹ 1.27 crores and raised a total demand of ₹ 5.87 crores. 3. The petitioner challenged this order of assessment by filing Appeal. The appellate authority asked the petitioner to deposit 30 per cent of the entire demand by way of predeposit. Against said order, the petitioner approached the Tribunal. The Tribunal by the impugned o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ransactions with Diamond Oil Industries were bogus. Merely because Diamond Oil Industries did not reflect its full sales to the petitioner in the tax returns, would not automatically imply that the petitioner had not made such purchases or not paid corresponding tax. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that defects are glaring. The petitioner claimed to have made purchases from Diamond Oil Industries, whereas in the returns filed, Diamond Oil Industries has decla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in which he concedes that sales made to the petitioner during the year 2010-2011 could not be reflected in the books of account and were therefore, not reported in the sale register and in turn, not shown in the periodical returns filed under VAT Act. In fact, going by this letter on which the petitioner itself relies, said Diamond Oil Industrie's stand appears to be that none of the sales made to the petitioner were reflected in the registers and correspondingly in the returns filed under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. I Bharat A Patel aged about 71 years, son of Atmaram N Patel working as director in Diamond Oil Industries Pvt.Ltd. Having its office at summer palace Vilas Mandal, Ashram road, Ahmedabad do solemnly state and affirm as under: 2. Our company had sold goods i.e. Oil to M/s. Neel Oil Industries Kadi of R. 510440802/- during the year 201-11 and issued Tax invoices and also charged VAT separately. The company had also received the payment of goods from M/s. Neel Oil Industries. The sales made to M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 IT

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version