Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

MS ABC ENGINEERING WORKS, VIJAYAWADA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR

Waiver of pre-deposit - demand of service tax - undue hardship - Tribunal concluded that the assessee has failed to establish prima facie case and dismissed the said application on the ground that the assessee failed to prove undue hardship and ordered substantial amount of pre-deposit - Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - the main grievance of the assessee is that the assessee is running in loss for the last many years prior to the demand and on the date of demand for payment of duty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pre-deposit as required under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act. - Therefore, the reasoning recorded by the Tribunal to decline waiver of predeposit is in accordance with law for the reason that the assessee himself disclosed the claim for depreciation to a tune of ₹ 6.80 crores, Sundry Debtors to the tune of ₹ 8.58 crores and loans and advances of ₹ 11.35 crores. Even otherwise, the assessee is a partnership firm, the partners are liable to pay statutory dues to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6 - Dated:- 16-6-2016 - SRI RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND SRI M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : SIVA KARTIKEYA ORDER: (Per Hon ble Sri Justice M.Satyanarayana Murthy) The assessee filed this appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bengalore bearing interim order No.152 of 2015 in Appeal No.ST/3612/2015 dated 05.08.2015. The parties to the appeal are hereinafter refe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or consideration. The services provided by the appellant fall under Section 65 (97a) and the same are liable for service tax under Section 65 (105) (zzza) of the Act from 16.06.2005. For the period 2007 - 2008 to 2010 - 2011, the adjudicating authority, vide its order dated 28.09.2012 bearing original No.91/2012 directed the appellant to deposit a sum of ₹ 11,73,95,057/- towards short payment of the service tax along with interest thereon since the petitioner deposited only ₹ 1.98 cr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dispute. The assessee also furnished copies of the income tax returns, profit & loss account statements and balance sheets for the periods ending on 31.03.2009, 31.03.2010 and 31.03.2011 before the tribunal to establish its financial difficulties as the assessee was incurring loss continuously for the period in dispute. The Tribunal while dealing with the said application of the assessee, concluded that the assessee has failed to establish prima facie case and dismissed the said application .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al did not consider the income-tax returns and other material produced before it in proper perspective and passed the impugned order by ignoring the material on record. The order is challenged on various grounds mainly contending that the Tribunal did not consider the financial hardship, which is a primary requirement to waive the pre-deposit. Though sufficient material was produced before the Tribunal, the Tribunal erroneously concluded that the current assets and the provision covering the cur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

further contended that since the assessee is running in loss for the past few years, it is not in a position to deposit the amount as directed by the Tribunal and it is an arduous task for the assessee to meet such demand and the assessee would face undue hardship in case the pre-deposit is not waived as per the proviso to Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and prayed to allow the appeal by setting aside the order passed by the Tribunal, which is under challenge in the appeal. Consider .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dly a partnership firm, whose liability is joint and several and the partners are also liable for payment of the debts due and statutory liabilities to the department including the respondent herein as per Section 25 of the Partnership Act. According to Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act the assessee is under obligation to make pre-deposit of disputed service tax unless it is waived. According to proviso to Section 35- F of the Central Excise Act, where in any particular case, the Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

edeposit may be waived subject to proof of undue hardship that would be suffered by the assessee. In the present facts and circumstances, the Tribunal directed to deposit a sum of ₹ 04.00 crores in compliance of Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, to claim waiver of pre-deposit, it is for the assessee to establish that the assessee would be put to undue hardship, if predeposit is not waived. Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act and Section 129-E of the Customs Act makes pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

establish that if pre-deposit is not waived, the assessee would be put to undue hardship. While granting such waiver of pre-deposit, the authorities concerned must keep in mind, the interest of revenue also (The Commissioner of Central Excise, Guntur Commisionerate, Guntur v. M/s. Sri Chaitanya Educational Committee, Poranki, Vijayawada, represented by its Managing Director (Judgment of A.P. High Court Division Bench in CEA No.301 of 2010 dated 19.01.2011)). In Indu Nissan Oxo Chemicals Industr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on a cursory glance, it appears that the demand raised has no legs to stand, it would be undesirable to require the appellant to pay the full or a substantial part of the demand. There can be no rule of universal application in such matters, and the order should be passed keeping in view the factual aspects involved in the case. The Tribunal does not have the license to pass an order which cannot be sustained on the touchstone of fairness, legality and public interest. Where denial of interim re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tribunal or the authorities concerned to safeguard the interest of the revenue and impose certain conditions as my be required as held in Union of India v. Adani Exports Limited (2007) 13 SCC 207 Before adverting to the facts of the case, it is appropriate to advert to the requirement specified in proviso to Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act and Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1952. The basic requirement to waiver of pre-deposit is undue hardship to such person. The word undue hardship i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ss, peril, blow, severity, desolation, harm, damage, casualty, deprivation, grievance, bane, destitution, suffering, pain as per West s Legal Thesaurus/Dictionary. If both the words undue and hardship are read conjointly, it is nothing but more than necessary suffering or exorbitant or difficulty. This Court, while dealing with the similar issue in batch of Appeals C.E.A.No.45 of 2015 and batch (B.Hima Bindu v. Commissioner of Customs) held that while considering the application, seeking waiver .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould derive from its compliance. Undue hardship is a matter within the special knowledge of the applicant, and must be established by him. A mere assertion of undue hardship would not suffice. The expression undue hardship is, ordinarily, related to economic hardship. The Tribunal is required to consider the question whether or not a direction to deposit the amount would cause undue hardship. Without considering the said question, it cannot go into the merits of the appeal itself. (Bhavya Appare .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to exercise its discretion judiciously and keeping in mind the principles laid down in M/s Sri Chaitanya Educational Committee, Poranki, Vijayawada s case, which are as follows. 1. The applications for stay should not be disposed of in a routine manner unmindful of the consequences flowing from the order requiring the assessee to deposit full or part of the demand; 2. Three aspects to be focused while dealing with the applications for dispensing of pre-deposit are: (a) prima facie case, (b) bal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erests of revenue have to be kept in view; 6. When the Tribunal decides to grant full or partial stay, it has to impose such conditions as may be necessary to safeguard the interests of the revenue. This is an imperative requirement; and 7. An appellate Tribunal, being a creature of the statute, cannot ignore the statutory guidance while exercising general powers or expressly conferred incidental powers. In the present facts before us, the main grievance of the assessee is that the assessee is r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Profit and Loss account, the assessee claimed depreciation to an extent of ₹ 6.80 crores. The Profit and Loss account discloses that Sundry Debtors are to the tune ₹ 8.58 crores, and Loan and Advances to the tune of ₹ 11.35 crores. The depreciation claimed to the extent of ₹ 6.80 crores is only for accounting purpose and there will not be any outflow of money for claiming depreciation. That apart Sundry Debtors are more than ₹ 8.50 crores besides loans and advance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee is ₹ 11.35 crores besides Sundry Debtors to a tune of ₹ 08.58 crores. The assessee can realise the amount from the Sundry Debtors and loans and advances, and make pre-deposit as required under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, the reasoning recorded by the Tribunal to decline waiver of predeposit is in accordance with law for the reason that the assessee himself disclosed the claim for depreciation to a tune of ₹ 6.80 crores, Sundry Debtors to the tune o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y material. On an overall consideration of the material on record, the assessee possessed sufficient means to comply with the requirement of Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act and that the assessee would not be put to financial hardship for compliance of the same. By applying the principles laid down in M/s Sri Chaitanya Educational Committee, Poranki, Vijayawada s case, it is for the Tribunal or any authority to consider prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss, which a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xcise Act, the limitation to issue show cause notice is within one year from the date of short levy or short payment or erroneous refund or when erroneous refund is made, but, a proviso annexed to it permits the department to issue show cause notice within five years from the date of such short levy, short payment of erroneous refund due to fraud, collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder. Thus, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vice in the Service Tax-3 return and also contravened the provisions of Finance Act and Service Tax Rules with an intent to evade payment of service tax. Thus, the case on hand prima facie falls within the ambit of provision to Section 11-A of Central Excise Act and thereby, the contention of the petitioner that it is barred by limitation is not a ground to find out prima facie case in favour of the assessee. However, this issue can be decided finally in the appeal pending before the competent a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disputed the demand on the ground of limitation, but unable to satisfy this Court prima facie that the demand is barred by limitation at this stage. However, it is open to the assessee to raise the question of limitation in an appeal. Therefore, in view of reason in earlier paragraphs, we find no prima facie case or a case to go for trial or arguable case in favour of the assessee. Since the assessee failed to establish prima facie case in its favour, the other two requirements i.e. balance of c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

News: Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters

News: Clarification about Transition Credit

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version