Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2016 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT CHENNAI - 2016 (341) E.L.T. 311 (Tri. - Chennai) - Levy of penalty for abatement - alleged violation of having filed an invalid Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate (PSIC) - confiscation and redemption fine - Held that:- The purpose of PSI Certificate is that the consignment does not contain any types of arms, ammunition, mines, shells cartridges or any other explosive materials in any form used or otherwise and that the consignment was checked for radiation level and it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n-compliance with the fulfilment of the conditions may entail 100% goods carried by the consignment being subjected to inspection and that would not tantamount to improper import of goods u/s 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. - Revenue has failed to bring home the charge of abatement against the appellant. - No penalty - Decided in favor of appellant. - C/41091 - 41092/2015 - FINAL ORDER No.41062-41063/2016 - Dated:- 4-7-2016 - SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Dr. SunitaSundar. R, Advocate, For .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

teel Melting Scrap HMS 1&2 vide Bill of Entry No. 4920206 dated 17.03.2014 of declared assessable value of ₹ 17,77,907/- and B/E No. 4920088 dated 17.03.2014 of declared assessable value of ₹ 16,18,351/-. As per the Import Policy, each consignment should be accompanied by Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate (PSIC). The show cause notice was issued by the respondent for alleged violation of having filed an invalid PSI Certificate. It was also found that the declared value of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

redeem the same on payment of a fine of ₹ 2,50,000/- (OIO No. 25804) and ₹ 2,00,000/- (OIO 25805) under Section 125 of the Act along with all applicable duties. He has also imposed a penalty of ₹ 1,00,000/- under Section 112 (a) of the Act on the appellant under both the OIO.On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal on the ground that the appellants were not complying with the conditions of Import in terms of Para 2.32 of the Hand Book of Procedures and failed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

anner prescribed in Annexure-I to Appendix-5, for which delivery agents cannot be penalized. On examination of the cargo it did not reveal any untoward materials/articles. She further submitted that the PSI certificate was issued by M/s. Ravi Energie INC, USA, in the format as required under the Handbook and Public Notice and they are listed under Appendix 5 as item No. 98. The Ld. Counsel strongly argued that apart from various documents indicating that not only in Scychelles, but also Morocco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction of the cargo there was no incriminating materials, as stated in the public notice was recovered rendering them liable for confiscation. She relied on the following case laws in support of her contentions: 1. A.R. Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CC, CESTAT Delhi-2006 (200) ELT 411 (Tri.-Del.) 2. Dee-Vee Metals Vs. CC-2007 (216) ELT 223 (Tri.-Mum.) 3. Rashmi Jain Vs. Addl. Director General of Foreign Trade-2015 (316) ELT 389 (Del.) 4. NGA Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CC, Chennai-F.O.1487/2009 dated 16/10/200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Seychelles. They are listed for S. Korea, North America, UAE, European Union etc. The appellant should provide the cargo on board provided that it is bonafide, legal. But in the instant case, they have allowed the cargo without a proper PSI Certificate and failed to discharge their basic bonafide duty. By allowing the cargo, they have abetted the importer, in importing contravened goods. Accordingly, the adjudicating authority has rightly imposed penalty under Section 112 (a) of the Act. There .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version