Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Universal Impex, Mumbai Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Ill.

Rebate claim of duty paid on exported goods under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - applicant failed to follow procedure of self sealing as provided in para 3(a)(xi) of the Notification No. 19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06.09.2004 and failed to submit triplicate and quadruplicate ARE-I to range Superintendent vide Order-in-Original No.22/10-11/ACC Rebate/Raigad dated 07.0412010. - Held that:- if goods are cleared from a factory for export under claim for rebate it has to be under the cover .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich are exported and without having followed the procedure as described in the Notification it cannot be established that goods which were cleared from factory were the ones actually exported or goods exported cannot be correlated with goods cleared from factory. - Government notes that it is an undisputed fact on record that in the present case the goods have been cleared by the applicant from the factory of the manufacturer on invoices only between 19.04.2007 to 23.04.2007 and dispatched .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich may be condoned. - Rebate claim denied. - Decided against the assessee. - F.No.195/254/12-RA - Order No. 10/2016-CX - Dated:- 15-1-2016 - Smt. Rimjhim Prasad, Joint Secretary ORDER: This revision application is filed by applicant M/S Universal Impex, Mumbai, against the Order-in-Appeal US/506/RGD/11 dated 30.12.11 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-Ill with regard to Order-in Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise (Rebate), Raigad. 2. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rder-in-Original No.22/10-11/ACC Rebate/Raigad dated 07.0412010. 3.Being aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original applicant filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) who rejected 'the same vide the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.US/506/RGD/11 dated 30.12.2011. 4.Now, being aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal, the applicant has filed this revision application before Central Government under Section 35 EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 mainly on the following grounds: 4.1 We submit that the triplicat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecisions of the Tribunal documents such as Shipping Bills, Central Excise Invoice submitted showing export of goods and duty payment- Earlier Such ARE-I signed by RO and rebate granted fault lies with RO - following the ratio of various Tribunal decisions, it is held that the applicant is entitled to rebate claims - Barot Exports {2006 (205) ELT 321 4.3 In the case of Caspro Export before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune Il reported in 2010 (261) ELT 790 (Commr. Appl), it was h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard to duly payment and there is no dispute whether the goods had been exported or not. There is only a technical lapse, which may please be condoned. 4.5 The applicant in this case has submitted the Original & Duplicate copies of ARE-I, Part-B of which is duly endorsed by Customs and also submitted copy of Shipping Bill, Bill of Lading and BRC. There is an endorsement on Part-B of ARE-I that the goods had been exported. There is no dispute with regard to duty payment and there is no dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

apses as the same was first time export. Nobody attended hearing on behalf of department. A written submission was also made during the hearing as under: 5.1 The subject export is our first export of goods with dock stuffing and accordingly the first claim for refund of excise duty. The ARE-I for the said shipment was prepared after the complete consignment was received at JNPT Container Terminal. The stuffing of the containers was done under custom supervision and thereafter the ARE-I was signe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

As this was our first instance of export, our staff had presumed to submit the ARE-I within 48 hours of stuffing of container of and after authentication by custom officials. 5.4 However after lapse of 4 months, the ARE-I was signed by excise official, after which we could submit the refund claim. 5.5 In this particular instance we have submitted all the documents leaving no doubt about export of the subject consignment and confirmation have been received from excise authorities about payment of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

& written submission and perused the impugned Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal. 7.On perusal of records, Government observes that the applicant's rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules 2002 was rejected on the ground that the applicant did not submit the triplicate and quadruplicate ARE-I to jurisdictional Range Superintendent within 24 hours of the date of clearances and also failed to follow the procedure of self-sealing as prescribed in para 3(a)(xi) of the Notificati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the goods sealed at the place of dispatch by a Central Excise Officer or under self sealing. 8.1 The exporter shall present the goods along with 4 copies of application in Form ARE-I to the Superintendent or Inspector of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of production who shall verify the identity of goods mentioned on the application and the particulars of the duty paid or payable, and if found in order, shall seal each package or container and endorse each copy of the app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tendent or Inspector of Central Excise within 24 hours of removal of goods. 8.3 From a plain reading of the above provisions it is clear that if goods are cleared from a factory for export under claim for rebate it has to be under the cover of an ARE-I duly certified for purpose of identity of goods either by the Superintendent/lnspector or the person from the factory as the case may be. This duly verified/certified ARE-I is then certified by the Customs after due verification/examination that g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tory. 8.4 Therefore, Government notes that nature of above requirement is both a statutory condition and mandatory in substance which also finds support in various judgments of the Apex Court: 8.4.1 Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sharif-ud-Din, Abdul Gani - (AIR 1980 SC 3403) has observed that distinction between required forms and other declarations of compulsory nature and/or simple technical nature is to be judiciously done. When non-compliance of said requirement leads to any specific/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cation has to be treated as a part of the statute and it should be read along with the Act as held by in the case of Collector of Central Excise Vs. Parle Exports (P) Ltd - 1988(38) ELT 741 (S.C.) and Orient Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India 1978 (2) ELT J 311 (S.C.) (Constitution Bench). 9. Government notes that it is an undisputed fact on record that in the present case the goods have been cleared by the applicant from the factory of the manufacturer on invoices only between 19.04.200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under excise supervision or under self-sealing and self-certification procedure. The conditions and procedure as laid down under Notification No. 19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06.09.2004 for sealing of goods at the place of dispatch were not followed. Correlation can therefore not be said to have been established as to whether the goods that were cleared from the factory, were the same as those exported. 10.Government also observes that the applicant relied on the various judgments regarding procedural r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version