Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore. Versus M/s. Globe Technologies, Bangalore.

2016 (7) TMI 232 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Rebate / refund claim on export of goods - non-realization of foreign exchange - exporter has not submitted (BRCs) in respect of export clearances - Commissioner (Appeals) observed that submission of BRCs have not been envisaged as precondition for grant of rebate under Notification No. 19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06.09.2004 read with Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. - Held that:- It is a fact on record that the stipulated period of one year for the realization of export proceeds had been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to submit the BRCs to the department. Though it is claimed by them before the Revisionary Authority that remittance has been received by them partially, no evidence has been produced to that effect. - It is a universally known principle that one of the main reasons any export incentive including rebate is allowed is to encourage export- generated foreign exchange earnings for the country. From a harmonious reading of Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, Notification No. 19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore - Il Commissionerate against Order-in-Appeal Nos. 413, 414 & 415 / 2011 - C.C dated 26.12.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I), with respect to the Orders-in-Original dated 01.04.2011, 30.06.2011, 21.07.2011 passed by the Assistant Commissionerate Central Excise, "El" Division, Bangalore. M/S. Globe Technologies is the respondent in these cases. 2. Brief facts of the cases are that the respondents are regist .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.07.2011 & 28.04.2010 on the date of the Order-in-Original viz 01.04.2011, 30.06.2011 & 21.07.2011 when in terms of RBI guidelines the foreign proceeds are to be realized within a period of one year from date of export. He therefore, rejected the rebate of duty for non production of BRCs. 3. Being aggrieved by the impugned Orders-in-Original, the respondent filed appeals before Commissioner (Appeals), who was of the view that the rebate sanctioning authority can very well verify the BRC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Revision Applications under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the following grounds: 4.1 Though BRC is not one of the documents to be filed along with the rebate claim as per Para 8.1 to 8.5 of Chapter 8 of the CBEC Manual of Supplementary Instructions, yet BRC is one of the vital documents to monitor the realization of export proceeds in the case of exports. 4.2 Board vide Circular No. 354/70/97-CX dated 13.11.1997 (relied by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the Order-in-Appeal) ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve months from the date of export, subject to review after one year. 4.4 The order rejecting the rebate claim was passed by the Assistant Commissioner on 01.04.2011, 30.06.2011 and 21.07.2011 by which time the prescribed time limit of twelve months for realization of the export proceeds as per the RBI's instructions had also elapsed. Even considering the Board's Circular referred to at 4.2 the assesse had time up to 07.09.2012, 07.10.2012 and 28.12.2011 respectively to produce the BRCs, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

proceeds have been realized by the assesse as per the instructions of the Reserve Bank of India and also as to whether the assesse had complied with the requirements of the above said Board's Circular. Thus, the orders of Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the order of rebate sanctioning authority, are improper and deserve to be set aside as the same have been passed without proper verification of the documents and without considering whether the assesse had complied with the requirements .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed upon Hon'ble Allahabad High Court's Order in case of Polyptex Corporation Ltd. Vs. Joint Secretary, Finance reported in 2014 (306) E.L.T. 24 (All) with respect to Government of India Order No. 1184/2011-CX dated 07.09.2011. They also submitted that they have obtained full realization of export proceeds in respect of the revision application and 50% realization of the remaining two export proceeds. Therefore while the 1 st revision application becomes infructous straight away under the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0 dated 30.06.2008 & Board's Circular No. 354/70/97 CX dated 13.11.1997, and that rebate is an export incentive given for earning foreign exchange for the country and no evidence has been produced for the realization of export proceeds. Further vide letter dated 15.05.2015, the Commissioner, Central Excise Bangalore-Il, informed that the assesse has not produced any evidence for having realized the export proceeds even after the stipulated time limit. Then again vide letter dated 15.06.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t observes that the rebate claims were rejected by the original authority on the ground that the respondent failed to produce Bank Remittance Certificates for export clearances for the periods 21.12.2009, 28.06.2010 to 23.07.2011 and 18.04.2010 and till the date of the impugned orders, when in terms of RBI guidelines, the foreign exchange proceeds are to be realized within a period of one year from the date of export. The Commissioner (Appeals) was of the view that as per notification 19/2004-CE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the main issue is whether rebate can be denied when at the time of sanction of the claim, the period prescribed for receipt of foreign exchange remittance is over. In this case there is no doubt that the export pertained to the period 21.12.2009, 28.06.2010 to 23.07.2011 and 18.04.2010 and pending the sanction of the rebate, Show Cause Notices were issued on 18.03.2011, 19.05.2011, and 08.07.2011 (for non production of proof of realization of export proceeds) i.e after the BRCs become due. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ended. 11. Government observes that Commissioner (Appeals) has mainly relied upon CBEC's Circular No. 354/70/97-CX dated 13.11.1997 which reads as under: "It has been brought to the notice of the Board that there are inordinate delays in acceptance of proof of export where goods are exported through an Inland Container Depot/ Customs Freight Stations (ICDs/CFSs) because of delayed receipt non-reciept of the Transference Copies from the Customs formations at the port of exit. This causes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ended (Shed) will give a certificate in part-B of the Original, Duplicate and Sixtuplicate copies of AR-4/ AR-5 simultaneously when he gives the Let Export Order on the Shipping Bills in terms of Section 51 of the Customs Act, 1962. This Certificate shall be in the following from in lieu of the format given in Part-B of the AR-4/AR-5: Certified that the consignment was stuffed in Container No(s) under Shipping Bill No. dated for which the Let Export Order was given on the day of The Customs at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ference Copiés of the Shipping Bill (TR-I & TR-II) move along with the goods from ICD/CFS to the port of shipment and are endorsed with the details of Mate Receipt No, name of the issuing person, details of the cases/cartons/packages/containers, name of the ship, sate of sailing and the port of sailing by the officer of Customs (Preventive Officer) who supervises the shipment. One copy of TR is received back in ICD/CFS on the basis of which the officers of Customs at ICD/CFS complete .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Maritime Commissioner, as the case maybe. These should be accepted for the purpose of verifying the shipment of the goods at the Gateway port After verification, that goods have actually been exported, the rebate claims should be sanctioned or the bond should be discharged, as the case may be. 2.3.1 A post facto verification shall be done by the Central Excise Division. The file for acceptance of proof of export shall be dosed, once TR copy is received from ICD/CFS within 120 days of the LET .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not received within 160 days of the date of sanction of rebate, action for recovery of rebate shall be initiated well within the limitation period Government notes that this Circular deals with speedy acceptance of proof of exports in respect of goods exported though Inland Container Depots/ Customs Freight Stations. It merely prescribes for furnishing of BRC in lieu of transference copy of Shipping Bill for purpose of proof of export in case of clearance for export from ICDs and if the TR copy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

03.06.2008 by virtue of which the period of realization and repatriation to India of the amount representing the full export value of goods has been laid down as twelve months from the date of export. Therefore, for any export made exchange proceeds are to be received within 06 months/one year or extended period as permitted by RBI. 13. Government notes that as per condition at para 2(g) of Notification No. 19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06.09.2004, rebate of duty paid on those excisable goods export of w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f foreign exchange is due or has accrued to any person resident in India, such person shall take all steps to realize and repatriate to India, such foreign exchange within time period prescribed by RBI. Further, Section 13 of Foreign Exchange Management Act stipulates penalty provision for non -realization of foreign exchange. The provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act make it clear that the export of goods without realization of export proceed is not permitted. So in such cases, the reba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version