Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.C.E., Delhi III, Gurgaon Versus Jayhshin Ltd., Shri Vinayak Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Clandestine removal of goods - demand of duty on the basis of turnover of their dealer - manufacturing or automobile parts - Commissioner (Appeals) oberved that clandestine removal of goods is on the basis of assumption and presumption, therefore, the demand of duty are not sustainable - Held that:- As it is clear from the facts of the case itself that M/s SVTC is not exclusively dealer of the appellant and exclusively selling goods manufactured by the respondent M/s JYL but purchasing of goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r of their dealer. - No demand can sustain - Decided against the revenue. - Central Excise Appeal No. 2884 to 2887 of 2006 - Final Order No. 60103-60106/2016 - Dated:- 19-5-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Judicial Member and Mr. Raju, Technical Member Present Shri Sanjay Jain, A.R. for the Appellant/Revenue Present Ms. Krati Somani with Ms. Swati Gupta, Advocates for the respondent. Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the duty demand has been dropped and penalties imposed on all .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manufacturing of clandestine removal of goods and selling them through M/s SVTC. The evidences to allege the same are statements of Shri S.K. Dev, (General Manager) of M/s SVTC during the course of investigation and the agreement between M/s JYL and SVTC. Show cause notices were adjudicated and the adjudicating authority confirmed the duty from M/s JYL along with interest and various penalties were imposed on all the respondents. On appeal before the ID. Commissioner (Appeals) the ID. Commissio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

therefore, the impugned order is to be set aside. 3. Ld. A.R. appearing for Revenue drew our attention to the adjudication order wherein the adjudicating authority has recorded the fact that Shri S K Dev, General Manager of M/s SVTC has made statement that he was looking after the sales of M/s SVTC and dealt with the product manufactured by M/s JYL for which they introduced themselves as representative of M/s JYL, He has also said that the orders from the dealers were received indicating that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same JYL has shown clearance to M/s SVTC is very less quantity in their books of account where SVTC cleared huge quantity of auto parts, therefore, the said evidence is the crucial evidence from where M/s SVTC procured the goods. On the other hand ID. Counsel for the respondents supported the impugned order. 4. Heard the parties and perused the records. On perusal of the records and considering the arguments advanced by both sides we find that in this case, the case has been made on the presu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w Bansal Agency who are dealers of M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. and purchasing goods and selling them in the open market and the clearances were presumed by Revenue as manufacture of M/s JYL which is not correct and as per investigation itself, these things have been examined by the Id. Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order wherein he has observed as under : 16. The charge of the clandestine removal is based on the fact that the sales made by SVTC were in excess to the goods that had been suppli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e proved by the department by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. 17. The appellants have contended that there is no basis whatsoever on the above finding that there has been clandestine removal of goods by JYL to SVTC and there is no evidence produced by the Department to show that there has been clandestine removal of the goods by the department to show clandestine removal of the goods and merely because there have been some excess sales by SVTC (Which also has been explained by SVTC in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad purchased the goods which is as under : - (a) M/s A.P. Motors-Trader (b) New Bansal Agencies-Trader (c) M/s Modern Engg. Works-Manufacturer (d) M/s Trust Auto Corpn.- Manufacturer (e) M/s Tacco Auto Industries Manufacturer 19. The appellants had further denied the allegation made that they only issued invoice and the goods have not been supplied as this allegation was without any basis and no evidence had been produce in respect of the above allegation. Further, SVTC were the distributor of J .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spect of their contention that they had been purchasing the goods from other dealers as well and against the purchases made by them from other dealers, they were making the payment through cheque and this would show that transaction were duly accounted as well. 20. Further on perusal of statement dated 12.08.99 of Sh. Dev, Manager of SVTC and statement dated 10.1.2001, it has been stated that SVTC were dealing with the goods of JYL. It would be wrong to conclude that SVTC were only dealing with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s were purchased from AP motors. Therefore it becomes clear that majority of the goods were purchased by them from the local dealers. This supports the submission made by SVTC that they were purchasing the goods from other dealers as well and there is no rebuttal to these evidence that they had purchased these goods from the local dealers. 22. The impugned order has relied on the facts that the invoices under which goods have been purchased by SVTC from the local dealers does not have certain pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ention that they had purchased from the local dealers and that there is no excess sale made by them. It is further found that the impugned order had decided on the basis that SVTC could sell only goods supplied by JYL and no other goods. This finding appears to be not correct in view of the fact that SVTC were the distributors of JYL which only meant that JYL would sell the goods in the replacement market through SVTC and this does not mean at all that SVTC cannot buy goods on its own from other .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version