GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 346 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

2016 (7) TMI 346 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH - 2016 (337) E.L.T. 441 (Tri. - Chan.) - Valuation - Classification - manufacturing chassis for ambulances and sending it to the second appellant for building body of the ambulances on such chassis. - Classifiable under chapter heading 87.02 or 87.03 - whether it should be valued on cost construction basis or on the basis of the sale price of the ambulances to independent buyers, by the second appellant - Held that:- Primary test is that sitting capacity of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ey have paid duty as per Rule 10A, this fact has to be examined by the adjudicating authority whether the appellants have paid duty as per Rule 10A or not. - Matter remanded back. - E/2350 & 2367/2011-EX(DB) - Final Order No. 258-259/2016-CHD - Dated:- 16-12-2015 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Judicial Member and Mr. Raju, Technical Member Shri B. L. Narshimhan, Advocate-for the appellant Shri B.B. Sharma, A.R. - for the respondent ORDER M/s Sita Singh & Sons is the first appellant and M/s. SML Isuzu L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le price of the ambulances to independent buyers, by the second appellant. The second issue is that the first appellant has paid duty under heading 87.02 of the Central Excise Tariff whereas the department is proposing classification under heading 87.03 of the Central Excise Tariff. 3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the issue No. 1 regarding valuation of ambulances has been settled against the appellant in the case of Audi Automobiles Vs. -2010 (249) ELT 124 (Tri.-Del.). Theref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and the like The case of the Revenue is that since there is specific eight digit entry for ambulances under heading 87.03 ambulances were classifiable under 87.03 for the whole period that is even for the period prior to 2005. He submitted that such ground is not sustainable as the appellant is manufacturing motor vehicles principally designed for transport of more than six persons excluding the driver, will fall under heading 87.02 only. The heading 87.03 covered only motor cars and other moto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d Tariff Item at eight digit level cannot expand the scope of the description of Heading and hence only ambulances which can carry six persons or less will come in that tariff item. He also submitted that there is no dispute about the ambulances in question was designed for carrying more than six persons. In fact these vehicles are capable of carrying 14 persons including driver. Therefore, vehicles are classifiable under heading 87.02 and on that ground they are not liable to pay duty as per cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

O Ltd. Vs. CCE, Pune-I 2006 (206) ELT 873 (Tri.-Mumbai) to say that if vehicle carry 8 persons when patient is not carried in lying condition in that case this is to be classified under 87.02. 6. On the other hand, learned AR reiterated the finding in the impugned order and submitted that this vehicle is specifically mentioned in tariff heading which is appropriately classifiable under heading 8703. 7. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 8. The tariff entries which are relevant for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs. 8703.10 Three wheeled motor vehicles 8703.90 Other 8. It is admitted fact that the vehicle in dispute can carry more than 13 persons. After going through the tariff heading only it is to determine whether the vehicle is for transport of more than 10 persons or not as classification of vehicle under heading 87.02 or 87.03 is to be decided on the basis of sitting capacity of the vehicle only. As per heading 87.03 it is clearly mentioned that the said classification shall be applicable to the v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant undertook at bar that none of these vehicles which have been indicated in their registration certificate having certificate of 4 persons have been manufactured by the appellant before us. Therefore, the contention of the Revenue is not accepted in the absence of contrary evidence. We further, find that in the case of TELCO (supra), this Tribunal came to an occasion to decide classification, it has been observed by this Tribunal as under : - 2. It is not in dispute that the impugned v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version