New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 354 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

2016 (7) TMI 354 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA - TMI - Condonation of delay in filing revision application - Rejection of rebate/ rebate claim over and above FOB value - export of goods - ground of dis-allowance of appeal is that the assessable value was more than correct FOB value and therefore, there was excess payment of duty and excess rebate could not sanctioned by the adjudicating authority to the extent of said excess payment of ₹ 1,16,603/- Held that:- On perusal of the same, Government no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n that onus to show cause for not filing application is on the applicant who has failed to show sufficient cause that prevented him from filing Revision Application within stipulated period of three months. The Revision Application has been made contrary to the provisions of Section 35EE (2) and is, therefore, liable for rejection. - Decided against the applicant. - F.No.195/407/12-RA - ORDER NO. 24/2016-CX - Dated:- 29-1-2016 - SMT. RIMJHIM PRASAD JOINT SECRETARY ORDER: This revision applicatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 11,66,03/-, 3. Being aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original, applicant filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that while disallowing the rebate claim of ₹ 11,66,03/-, the original authority had not mentioned any reasons During the course of Personal Hearing the Commissioner (Appeals) took note of the applicant's submission that there is difference in FOB value and value shown in ARE-I and the same is due to freight and insurance and accordingly, held that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tioned by the adjudicating authority to the extent of said excess payment of ₹ 1,16,603/-. This being the position, even though Applicant has claimed rebate of duty paid on the CIF value instead of FOB value of each the consignment covered, an exporter is entitled to rebate of the entire duty of excise paid on a consignment of excisable goods on its export. 4.2 In the premises, below mentioned judgement of Honorable, Tribunal has clearly reveals that Applicant is entitled for the rebate of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioning authority should not examine the correctness of assessment but should examine only the admissibility of rebate of the duty paid on the export covered by a claim. 5. Personal hearing was scheduled in this case on 06.07.2015, 2407.2015 and 17.08.2015. The applicant vide letter dated 03.082015 received on 11.08.2015 informed that the matter be decided on merits and the personal hearing. Nobody from department attended the hearing. Hence Government proceeds to decide the case on the basis of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jected part amount was on account of duty paid excess of FOB value and hence, is not admissible. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld impugned Order-in-Original. Now, the applicant has filed this Revision Application on grounds mentioned in para (4) above. The applicant has also filed on application for condonation of delay for delay of 4 days in filing Revision Application. 8. Government first proceeds to decide the issue of limitation in filing of Revision Applications after the stipulated three mont .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

application under sub-Section (1) shall be made within three months from the date of the communication to the applicant of the order against which the application is being made: Provided that the Central Government may, if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the application within the aforesaid period of three months, allow it to be presented within a further period of three months, Further Rule 10(2) of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 provi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version