Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 1055 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (6) TMI 1055 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Validity of service of notice - Admittedly, the same was returned with a specific postal endorsement ''LEFT'' since the said office was closed during the month of May, 2011. Thereafter, the respondent has chosen to send the above notice by registered post to Thiru Ajay Metha, Director, No.A20, Anand Niketan, New Delhi-21 and the same also appears to have been served on the above address. Therefore, the defence raised by the learned Counsel for the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. - W.P.No.18147 of 2015 and M.P.Nos 1 and 2 of 2015 - Dated:- 24-6-2015 - MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA For the Petitioner : Mr.M.Kamalanathan For the Respondent : Mr.V.Haribabu, Additional Government Pleader (T) O R D E R The Writ Petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 13.03.2015 passed by the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Ayanavaram Assessment Circle, Chennai-10 in his proceedings in TIN 33831003100/2010-2011 in and by which the As .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orward to file any objection nor requested any time to file objection so far. On this basis, he passed the impugned order. Since the proposal is not objected by the petitioner, the Assessing Officer confirmed the same in respect of tax and also levy of penalty. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the respondent issued notice to the registered place of business, namely, No.B.23/24, City Centre, No.232, Purasawalkkam High Road,Chennai-10, admittedly the same was return .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed on the Registered Office of the petitioner. The learned Counsel would also submit that in the absence of any valuable notice served on the Registered Office, it has to be construed that the petitioner has not given any opportunity to represent his case. 4. Heard Mr.V.Hari Babu, learned Additional Government Pleader (T) appearing for the respondent. 5. At the outset, I find no force in the arguments of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. It is to be noted that initially, the respondent has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version