GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 491 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2016 (7) TMI 491 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI - Extended period of limitation invoked - Disallowance of credit on service tax paid on input services for the period February, 2008 to June 2009 - main contention raised by appellant/Revenue is that the Commissioner(Appeals) has no powers to accept or consider additional evidence and delete the disallowance - Held that:- The evidence produced by the respondents before the Commissioner(Appeals) is nothing but originals of the invoices/bills of which phot .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r(Appeals) to direct the production of any document, or the examination of any witness, to enable him to dispose of the appeal . Needless to say, this rule gives necessary powers to accept and consider additional evidence. The Commissioner(Appeals) being a fact finding authority, is competent to peruse, verify and appreciate evidence adduced by parties. Therefore, no merits in the contention raised by Revenue. - Decided against revenue - Appeal No. E/27494/2013 - Dated:- 15-3-2016 - Ms. Sulekha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nput services for the period February, 2008 to June 2009. After adjudication, the original authority disallowed the credit observing the following: i) respondent did not furnish the original copies of bills / invoices, but produced only photocopies, ii) the bills on which service tax credit was availed was issued in the name of their Head Office, iii) some of the bills did not contain service tax registration number, iv) services were utilized by respondents for transportation of goods from outs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

grounds are raised in the appeal, he confines his argument with regard to one ground only i.e. whether the Commissioner(Appeals) has power to accept and consider additional evidence (the originals of bills / invoices). He referred to sub-rule (1) of Rule 5 of Central Excise Rules, 2001 and submitted that Commissioner(Appeals) can accept additional evidence only in situations contemplated in this rule. That no such situation has been proved to have happened by the respondents and that therefore t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version