GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (7) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Valuation - sale of manufactured manmade fiber and yarn through depot - inclusion of freight - Held that:- The Original Authority is fixated at adding the cost of transportation from factory to depot at rates equivalent to the equalized freight charged by the appellant from depot to the customer. He has disregarded the submission made by the appellant before him that the cost of transportation from factory to depot already stands included in the price. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the same as the cost of transportation from factory to depot. - Original Authority has travelled beyond the terms of remand and such an order passed by him cannot be upheld. - Demand set aside - Decided in favor of appellant. - Excise Appeal No. 321 of 2007 -Final Order No. 52173/2016 - Dated:- 15-6-2016 - MS. ARCHANA WADHWA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND SHRI V. PADMANABHAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri B.L. Narsimhan, Advocate - for the appellant. Shri R.K. Mishra, Authorized Representative (DR) - for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons of excise law at the relevant time, the appellant was required to discharge excise duty at the time of clearance of the goods from their factory at prices prevalent contemporaneously at the depots. To arrive at the assessable value for determination of duty, provisional assessment was resorted to by the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The dispute arose at the time of final assertion of the provisional assessment. The Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner finalized the provisional asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for quantifying the duty liability of the Assessee by computing the assessable value without including the freight and insurance for transport from the depots from where the sales take place to the buyers place. He was also directed to consider the calculation mistake while computing the duty liability for the period September 1998 to December 1998 as contended by the appellant. The Original Authority passed orders in denovo proceedings vide his .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d hence nothing more needs to be added. On the request of the purchasers, the goods are transported from the depot to the place of the customer. The cost of such transportation is recovered by them on an equalized basis. Accordingly, they have prayed that the equalized freight and insurance charges may be deducted from the depot price to arrive at the assessable value. (ii) The Adjudicating Authority has added the cost of equalized freight and transportation to the factory gate price considering .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r hand reiterates the findings of the authority below. He further submits that the appellant has failed to supply the freight and insurance charges incurred for transportation of goods from factory to depot. Since some expenses have been incurred towards this, the same needs to be loaded on the assessable value. 6. Heard both sides and perused the records. In terms of the valuation provisions prevalent at the relevant time, duty needs to be discharged at the factory gate at depot prices. Accordi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Original Authority, as well as before us, is that the cost of transportation from the factory up to the depot already stands included in the price and there is no need to load the value further. The Original Authority has not brought anything on record to disapprove the contention of the appellant. According to him, since some expenses would have been incurred for such transportation the same is required to be added to the assessable value. He has gone ahead and loaded the assessable value f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version