Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

F Studio Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer

Reopening of assessment - accommodation entries receipt - Held that:- It may be also noted that while in the reasons recorded, it has been stated that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. is not existing at the given address and therefore, the identity and creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction could not be established, whereas in the order disposing of the objections, the Assessing Officer has travelled much further and observed that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. of Kolkatta is a fictitious e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard, it is by now well settled that the validity of the reopening has to be examined on the basis of the reasons recorded and the reasons recorded cannot be supplemented either by the order disposing of the objection or by filing an affidavit in that regard. - In the present case, the Assessing Officer has examined the claim and not made any additions and has not discussed anything therein. However, once he has examined such claim, it is not permissible to reopen the assessment even withi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore, clearly without jurisdiction. The impugned notice under section 148 of the Act, therefore, cannot be sustained. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Special Civil Application No. 20212 of 2015 - Dated:- 19-4-2016 - Harsha Devani And G. R. Udhwani, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr Tushar P Hemani, Ms Vaibhavi K Parikh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir M Mehta, Advocate JUDGMENT ( Per Honourable Ms. Justice Harsha Devani ) 1. Rule. Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned Senior Standing Counsel waives ser .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

whereby, he seeks to reopen the assessment of the petitioner for assessment year 2010-11. 4. The facts as appearing from the petition are that petitioner, a company, is engaged in the business of trading in dress material. The petitioner filed its return of income for assessment year 2010-11 on 14.10.2010, declaring total income at ₹ 10,33,540/-, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Act. The case was later on taken up for scrutiny and assessment came to be framed under section 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reasons recorded, which, however, came to be disposed of by a letter dated 24.07.2015. Since certain further points came to the knowledge of the petitioner as regards certain technicalities pertaining to the reopening, further objections came to be raised vide letter dated 12.08.2015. The petitioner also requested for certified copies of the order sheets of assessment for assessment year 2010- 11. The petitioner also filed further letters raising objections against reopening. Ultimately, having .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l with premium, was not available at the given address and therefore, the identity and creditworthiness of that company and genuineness of the transaction could not be established. It was submitted that during the course of assessment proceedings, the then Assessing Officer found that the petitioner had received share application money from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd., hence, by a letter dated 26.11.2012, the Assessing Officer called for the information from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. under sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

details and the explanation furnished by the petitioner, the assessment came to be framed under section 143(3) of the Act assessing the total income of the petitioner at ₹ 12,06,671/- without making any addition in respect of the share application money received from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. 5.1 It was further submitted that in relation to assessment proceedings for assessment year 2012-13, the respondent issued a letter dated 05.02.2015, once again calling for information from M/s Glam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

desired by the then Assessing Officer. It was submitted that the petitioner in response to the show cause notice dated 19.02.2015 had brought to the notice of the respondent the fact that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. had furnished the requisite details to the respondent by placing on record postal receipt evidencing the fact as to furnishing of information by M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. to the respondent. It was submitted that in the light of the reply furnished by M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t length, hence, the reopening of the assessment is nothing but a change of opinion. 5.2 Referring to the order rejecting the objections filed by the petitioner, it was pointed out that the Assessing Officer has travelled much beyond the reasons recorded while rejecting the application made by the petitioner objecting to the reopening. Referring to the said order, it was submitted that it is nowhere stated therein that in the original proceedings, this issue was not gone into. It was pointed out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e company is proved, but has held that the argument of the petitioner is baseless and it cannot be said that a particular company is genuine even if the investor company is having PAN, filing income tax returns, having bank account and accounts are audited. It was pointed out that in connection with the submission of the petitioner that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. had in pursuance of the notice under section 133(6) of the Act, submitted the details called for during the course of assessment proc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s gone into in the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act and hence, the reopening being based upon a mere change of opinion, the assumption of jurisdiction on the part of the Assessing Officer is without authority of law. 5.3 In support of his submissions, the learned counsel placed reliance upon the decision of this court in the case of Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2013) 350 ITR 266, for the proposition that once the Assessing Officer examines a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t it is settled legal position that if the reopening of assessment fails on account of nonexistence of reasons for such reopening, the revenue cannot either sustain such reopening or bring within the assessment proceedings any other head of escaped income not mentioned in the reasons for reopening. It was, accordingly, urged that the petition deserves to be allowed by setting aside the impugned notice. 6 Opposing the petition, Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the genuineness of the transactions with the assessee company. Hence, after recording the reasons, notice was issued to the petitioner under section 148 of the Act. It was submitted that it is the case of the petitioner company that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. has submitted details in pursuance of the notice issued under section 133(6) of the Act during the course of assessment proceedings for assessment year 2012-13. However, on a perusal of the case record, it appears that no such details are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Reliance was placed upon the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd., (2012) 342 ITR 169, wherein the court held that the ratio of the Supreme Court in the case of Lovely Exports would not be applicable where the Assessing Officer is in possession of material that discredits and impeaches the particulars furnished by the assessee and also establishes the link between self-confessed accommodation entry providers , whose bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rival submissions, it may be germane to refer to the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment for assessment year 2010-11, which read as follows: In this case, the return of income was filed on 14.10.2010 declaring total income of ₹ 10,33,540/- and the same was assessed under section 143(3) of the I. T. Act, be accepting the same. [2] The assessee has claimed to have received share capital with premium from the following alleged investor company of Kolkatta: Sr. No. Name of the Inves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

genuineness of the transaction could not be established. Therefore, the share capital and share premium amounting to ₹ 12,50,000/- is non-genuine. [4] In view of the above facts and material, I have reason to believe that income of the assessee to the extent of ₹ 12,50,000/- has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Act for A.Y. 2011-12 on account of failure on part of the assessee to disclose all material facts in the return of income fully and truly and theref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recorded, according to the Assessing Officer, the assessee had claimed to have received share capital with premium from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. of a sum of ₹ 12,50,000/-. According to the Assessing Officer, during the assessment proceedings of assessment year 2012-13, it was unearthed that the investor company does not exist at the given address and therefore, identity and creditworthiness of that company and genuineness of the transaction could not be established and hence, the share .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oned therein for the period from 01.04.2009 to 31.03.2010 relevant to assessment year 2010-11. In response thereto, M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd., by a communication dated 05.12.2012, submitted the details required by the Assessing Officer, which included the nature of the transaction with date and amount, mode of payment/receipt with date, copy of accounts of the petitioner as appearing in its books for the financial year 2009-10, copy of the bank statement reflecting the payment given/received d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income of the petitioner at ₹ 12,06,671/- without making any addition in respect of the share capital money received from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd.. Now, the Assessing Officer seeks to reopen the assessment on the ground that during the course of assessment proceedings of assessment year 2012-13, it is found that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. is not found at the given address and therefore, income to the tune of ₹ 12,50,000/- has escaped assessment. 11 Thus, it is evident that at th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

furnished by the petitioner. In the subsequent year, according to the Assessing Officer, M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. was not found at the said address. This is based upon the fact that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. had not responded to the notice under section 133(6) of the Act during the course of the assessment proceedings for assessment year 2012-13. It may be noted that it is the specific case of the petitioner in the petition, which is supported by certain documents placed on record, that M/s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad responded to the notice under section 133(6) of the Act and had furnished the necessary details. While in the assessment order, there is no discussion as regards the share capital including the share premium of ₹ 12,50,000/- received from M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd., the record of the case clearly shows that the Assessing Officer had called for such details and thereafter, did not make any addition in the assessment order. This court in the case of Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd. v. Assi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

therein. However, once he has examined such claim, it is not permissible to reopen the assessment even within four years on the very same grounds. It is evident that the Assessing Officer has, therefore, formed an opinion on the issue in question though not reflected in the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Act. Thus, reopening of the assessment to examine the very same claim is, therefore, clearly based upon a change of opinion. The assumption of jurisdiction on the part of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order disposing of the objections, the Assessing Officer has travelled much further and observed that M/s Glamour Sales Pvt. Ltd. of Kolkatta is a fictitious entity just created to give accommodation entries to beneficiaries on commission basis; that the above investor company is not actual one but it is a paper company created for giving benefit to the beneficiaries; that any transaction with such bogus company is considered to be non-genuine and therefore, the share capital with share premium .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version