Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI

2016 (7) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Reopening of assessment - Claim for deduction under section 10A - Held that:- As in the light of the findings rendered by the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2009-10 upholding on merits the eligibility of the assessee’s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act for A.Y. 2009-10, the basis upon which the AO recorded the reasons for reopening the assessments for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09 (extracted supra) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

09-10 we also uphold the orders of the CIT(A) in allowing the assessee’s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09 on merits. It is accordingly ordered. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos. 5656 to 5659/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 8-7-2016 - Shri Jason P. Boaz, Accountant Member And Shri Sandeep Gosain, Judicial Member For the Appellant : Shri S. Senthil Kumaran For the Respondent : Shri Pradip Kapasi ORDER Per Jason P. Boaz, A.M. These appeals by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee for A.Y. 2005-06 to 2008-09 declaring NIL income were processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). The assessments for A.Y. 2005-06 and A.Y. 2006-07 were completed under section 143(3) of the Act vide orders dated 06.12.2007 and 17.02.2008 respectively wherein the income was assessed at NIL after accepting the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act. Subsequently, proceedings under section 147 of the Act were initiated a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al return of income was filed on 30.10.2005 showing total income at Rs.NIL. Assessee has claimed exemption u/s. 10 but during assessment proceedings for A.Y. 2009-10, it was noticed that the claim is not genuine. 2. In view of this facts and circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that income of ₹ 39,32,001/- chargeable to tax has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lenging these orders of assessment both on (i) technical grounds, i.e. the validity of proceedings initiated under section 147 of the Act, issue of notices under section 148 of the Act on 29.30/3.2002 and the validity of the resultant orders of assessment dated 18.03.2013; and (ii) on the merits of its claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act. 2.3 In the impugned orders for assessment year 2005-06 and 2006- 07, the learned CIT(A) allowed the assessee s appeal on both the technical ground .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ese proceedings. 5.1 In Ground Nos. 1 and 2, the appellant has challenged the reopening of assessment in the present case as bad in law. It has been submitted that as per the provisions of the Act; reopening of an assessment is possible only when there is formation of belief by the AO that income has escaped assessment. Also, in cases where reopening is sought to be done after a period of 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year, it is stated that the same can be resorted to only if .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e claim u/s 10A for A.Y. 2009-10 and that there is nothing to show that the appellant had not made a full or complete disclosure of the material facts. 5.1.1 As per the facts of the case, the original assessment for A.Y. 2005 - 06 was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 06/12/2007 accepting the returned income of Rs. Nil. In the said order the AO discussed the requirements for claim u/s 10A, observing as follows: "On verification of detailed submitted by the assessee during the course of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the claim is not genuine." Thus the sole basis for reopening the assessment in the present case is the disallowance of the appellant's claim during the assessment for A.Y. 2009 -10. 5.1.3 The notice u/s 148 was issued on 30/03/2012 i.e. more than 4 years after the end of the relevant assessment year. Thus the first proviso to section 147 would be applicable in the instant case. The said proviso reads as under: provided that where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r his assessment, for that assessment year." Under section 147, the primary condition to be satisfied prior to initiation of reassessment is that the Assessing Officer must have 'reason to believe' that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment and reopening must not be based on a mere change of opinion. In particular, the above proviso lays down that once an assessment is already completed under section 143(3), reopening can be only done in the circumstances specified in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jurisdiction upon the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings under section 147. The Apex Court held that "after 01.04.1989, the Assessing Officer had the power to reopen provided there is tangible material to come to a conclusion that there is escapement of income from assessment. Reasons must have a live link with the formation of belief." In the case of Aventis Pharma Ltd. vs ACIT reported at 323 ITR 570, the Hon'ble Bombay High Court dealt with a case where the revenue sought .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Delhi High Court held as follows: 13. It is, therefore, clear from the aforesaid position that: (1) Reassessment proceedings can be validly initiated iin case return of income is processes under section 143(1) and no scrutiny assessment is undertaken. In such case there is no change of opinion. (2) Reassessment proceedings will be invalid in case the assessment order itself records that the issue was raised and is decided in favour or the assessee. Reassessment proceedings in the said case will .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

will be invalid because the Assessing Officer had formed an opinion in the original assessment, though he had not recorded his reasons." 5.1.5 In the decision rendered in the case of CIT v Foramer France reported at 264 ITR 566, the Apex Court upheld the decision of the Allahabad High Court wherein it had been held that reopening of assessment was not permissible after 4 years unless there had been failure on the part of the appellant to make full and true disclosure of material facts. In t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

services. The Court held in favour of the appellant and reassessment was struck down. 5.1.6 In the decision rendered in the case of Voltas Ltd. v ACIT reported at 349 ITR 656, the Bombay High Court held that when a notice was issued for reopening a case after expiry of four years from end of relevant assessment year, the AO must apply his mind to the fundamental question as to whether there has been a failure to disclose all material facts on part of assessee and that where there is no failure o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessment pertain to events which have taken place after the order of assessment was passed. The first of those is the judgment of the Special Bench of the Tribunal which was delivered on 30 June 2010, according to which unabsorbed depreciation for the period up to 1996-97 could be carried forward and set off against the income under any head for a maximum period of eight assessment years. Consequently according to the Assessing Officer unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to Assessment Year 1994- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer may be reflective of the fact that there is an escapement of income. But, that in itself is not sufficient to validate the reopening of assessment beyond a period of four years. Beyond a period of four years, the power of the Assessing Officer is structured by the requirement that there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for the assessment. Neither the reasons which have been communicated to the assessee nor for that matt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

relevant Assessment Year, he must nonetheless apply his mind to the fundamental question as to whether there has been a failure to disclose on the part of the assessee. In the present case, ex facie there is no such allegation. Moreover, the return of income and the material placed on the record by the assessee together with the return would make it abundantly clear that the assessee had set forth the basis of its claim and there was no suppression of material facts. In these circumstances, and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. In CIT v. K. Mohan & Co. (Exports) [IT Appeal Nos. (Lodg.) 2347 of 2010 & 1263 of 2011, dated 1-7-2011], a Division Bench of this Court dealt with an appeal arising from a decision of the Tribunal cancelling reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer beyond a period of four years from the end of the relevant Assessment Year. The assessment was sought to be reopened as a result of a retrospective .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2] 18 taxman.com 290 (Bom.) dealing with the retrospective amendment of Section 115JB by the Finance Act of 2009 with effect from 1 April 2001. The Division Bench noted that clause (i) of Explanation 1 was introduced to include the amount or amounts set aside as provision for diminution in the value of investment. In view of the retrospective amendment of law by Parliament, the Court held that the Assessing Officer may have reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. But that in itself .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7 In the case of Prashant S. Joshi v ITO reported at 324 ITR 154 Bombay High Court held that even if there is no assessment u/s 143(3), reopening u/s 147 is bad if there are no proper reasons to believe and that the only reasons that can be considered for reopening are the reasons recorded by the AO. The Court held as follows: "9. Section 147 provides that if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessment year. The Assessing Officer must have reason to believe that such is the case before he proceeds to issue a notice under section 147. The reasons which are recorded by the Assessing Officer for reopening an assessment are the only reasons which can be considered when the formation of the belief is impugned. The recording of reasons distinguishes an objective from a subjective exercise of power. The requirement of recording reasons is a check against arbitrary exercise of power. For it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 147 that income has escaped assessment, must be determined with reference to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. The reasons which are recorded cannot be supplemented by affidavits. The imposition of that requirement ensures against an arbitrary exercise of powers under section 148." In this judgment, the Hon'ble Court also referred to the observations in the decision rendered in the case of in Hindustan Lever Ltd. V/s. R.B. Wadkar, elaborating that the reasons should .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recorded by him. He has to speak through his reasons.... The reasons recorded should be clear and unambiguous and should not suffer from any vagueness. The reasons recorded must disclose his mind. Reasons are the manifestation of mind of the AO. The reasons recorded should be self- explanatory and should not keep the assessee guessing for the reasons. Reasons provide link between conclusion and evidence. The reasons recorded must be based on evidence. The AO, in the event of challenge to the rea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

show that the assessment of the appellant's case was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 31/12/2007 after due examination and acceptance of the claim of deduction u/s 10A as is evident from the extract of the said assessment order reproduced in para 5.1.1 earlier. The time limit for reopening such an assessment, without failure on the part of the assessee as specified in the proviso to section147, was within 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year i.e. 31/03/2010. In the pres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as discussed in para 5.1.2 earlier make it evident that the AO has not brought on record anything to establish failure on the part of the appellant to disclose material facts. Accordingly, the reopening in this case cannot be held as valid and the impugned assessment is therefore quashed. The ground raised by the appellant is therefore allowed. 5.2 In Grounds No. 3 and 4, the appellant has challenged the disallowance of the claim u/s 10A on merits. As noted earlier, the assessment is re-opened p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the impugned order reflects no other reason for the reopening of the assessment than the disallowance of the claim u/s 10A for A.Y. 2009-10, the disallowance made is deleted on merits also and the ground raised by the appellant is allowed. 6. In the result the appeal is allowed. A.Y. 2006-07 7. The common grounds raised by the appellant have already been reproduced in para 2 of this common order earlier. The facts of the case for the year under consideration are that the appellant, a firm, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come at ₹ 46,03,760/-. The present appeal is filed against the said assessment order. As stated earlier, the grounds of appeal, statement of facts and written submissions made in this year are similar to those for A,Y, 2005-06. 7.1 In view of the similar facts and circumstances, the Grounds No.1 to 4 raised by the appellant for this year are allowed following the detailed reasoning given for A.Y. 2005-06. 8. In the result, both the appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07 are allowed. 2.4 Simi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce of deduction u/s 10A. I have carefully considered the facts relating to the said ground as they emanate from the impugned assessment order and the submissions made during these proceedings. 5.1 In Ground Nos. 1 and 2, the appellant has challenged the reopening of assessment in the present case as bad in law. It has been submitted that as per the provisions of the Act, reopening of an assessment is possible only when there is formation of belief by the AO that income has escaped assessment. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment are as follows: "In this case the original return of income was filed on 30.10.2005 showing total income at Rs. Nil. Assessee has claimed exemption u/s 10 but during assessment proceedings for A. Y. 2009-10, it was noticed that the claim is not genuine." Thus the sole basis for reopening the assessment in the present case is the disallowance of the appellant's claim during the assessment for A.Y. 2009-10. 5.1.2 Under section 147, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or reopening are the reasons recorded by the AO. The Court held as follows: "9. Section 147 provides that if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may subject to the provisions of Sections 148 to 163, assess or reassess such income and also any other income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under the section. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h can be considered when the formation of the belief is impugned. The recording of reasons distinguishes an objective from a subjective exercise of power. The requirement of recording reasons is a check against arbitrary exercise of power. For it is on the basis of the reasons recorded and on those reasons alone that the validity of the order reopening the assessment is to be decided. The reasons recorded while reopening the assessment cannot be allowed to grow with age and ingenuity, by devisin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arbitrary exercise of powers under section 148." In this judgment, the Hon'ble Court also referred to the observations in the decision rendered in the case of in Hindustan Lever Ltd. V/s. R.B. Wadkar, elaborating that the reasons should be clear and unambiguous "11. The same principle was reiterated in a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Hindustan Lever Ltd. V/s. R,B, Wadkar2:- "...the reasons are required to be read as they were recorded by the AO. No substitut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ry and should not keep the assessee guessing for the reasons. Reasons provide link between conclusion and evidence. The reasons recorded must be based on evidence. The AO, in the event of challenge to the reasons must be able to justify the same based on material available on record.... That vital link is the safeguard against arbitrary reopening of the concluded assessment. The reasons recorded by the AO cannot be supplemented by filing affidavit of making oral submission, otherwise, the reason .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e present case, we find that the first sentence of the so-called reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer is mere information received from the Deputy Director of Income-tax (Investigation). The second sentence is a direction given by the very same Deputy Director of Income-tax (Investigation) to issue a notice under section 148 and the third sentence again comprises of a direction given by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax to initiate proceedings under section 148 in respect of cases p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issue notice under section 148. We are afraid that these cannot be the reasons for proceeding under section 1471148 of the said Act. The first part is only an information and the second and the third parts of the beginning paragraph of the so-called reasons are mere directions, From the so-called reasons, it is not at all discernible as to whether the Assessing Officer had app/led his mind to the in formation and independently arrived at a belief that, on the basis of the material which he had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he fact of disallowance of a claim in a subsequent year cannot by itself be held to be sufficient to show that the appellant had not fulfilled conditions required to claim deduction u/s 10A during the year under consideration and that the income has escaped assessment during the said year. The reasons recorded do not show any application of mind by the AO. Accordingly, the reopening in this case cannot be held as valid and the impugned assessment is therefore quashed. The grounds raised by the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

new facts, the disallowance made is deleted on merits also and the grounds raised by the appellant is allowed. A.Y. 2008-09 6. The common grounds raised by the appellant have already been reproduced in para 2 of this common order earlier. The facts of the case are that the appellant a firm, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2006-07 on 31/10/2006 declaring total income of Rs. Nil after claiming deduction of 46,03,760/- u/s 10A. The return was processed and selected for scrutiny and assessment w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

similar to those for A.Y. 2007-08. 6.1 In view of the similar facts and circumstances, the Grounds No.1 to 4 raised by the appellant for this year are allowed in view of the detailed reasoning given for A.Y. 2005-06. 7. In the result, both the appeals for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008- 09 are allowed. 3.1 Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A)-31, Mumbai dated 21.07.2014 for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09, Revenue has preferred these appeals raising the following identical grounds for all the four as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gh and abnormal profit and claimed it as exempt u/s 10A. 4. The appellant prays the of the learned CIT(A) on the above ground may be set as aside and allow appellant s appeal. 5. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter any ground or to submit additional new ground which may be necessary. 3.2 The learned D.R. for Revenue was heard and placed support and reliance on the grounds raised and also the finding of the AO in the orders of assessment for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09. 3.3.1 Per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessments for these four assessment years was admittedly the finding rendered by the AO in the order of assessment for A.Y. 2009-10 that the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act was not genuine. In this regard, the learned A.R. for the assessee brought to the notice of the Bench that a Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee s case for A.Y. 2009-10, in its order in ITA No. 3941/Mum/2013 dated 11.12.2015, has upheld the order of the CIT(A) granting the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under section 10A of the Act for A.Y. 2009-10, being struck down, Revenue s appeals have no legs to stand on; both on the technical grounds of the validity of reopening the assessment for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09 and the validly of the resultant orders of assessments plus on merits also, as the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act is to be allowed. It is prayed that in these factual and legal matrix of the case, Revenue s appeals for assessment years 2005-06 to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he aforesaid four assessment years were required to be reopened for examining the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act. It is a matter of record that the said reassessment orders for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09 dated 18.03.2013 were passed disallowing the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act. On appeal, the learned CIT(A) in the impugned orders for assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09 dated 21.07.2014 allowed the assessee s appeals both on the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

learned CIT(A) in allowing the assessee s claim for deduction under section 10A of the Act as the assessee satisfied the conditions of eligibility to claim the said deduction. At paras 2 to 4 of its order, the Coordinate Bench has considered this issue and held as under:- 2. The Revenue has taken the following grounds of appeal: "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in directing to allow exemption u/s. 10A of I.T. Act, 1961 without appre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and his relatives. 3. The appellant prays that the order of Ld.CIT(A) on the above ground be set aside and matter be restored to the Assessing Officer. 4. The appellant craves leave to amend or to alter, any ground or add a new ground, which may be necessary." 3. The brief facts of the case are that during the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO) observed that the total expenses of the assessee for the year under consideration were ₹ 2.34 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

based on the incurring of such expenses. The AO also noted that as per transfer pricing report, the number of employees of the assessee concern was 80 but the salary register showed only 52 and observed that the assessee had not been able to prove the technical competence of any of the workers who provided the IT enabled services for civil engineering. The AO also took exception to the expenses incurred by the assessee towards foreign travel, partner's remuneration, depreciation on office p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ission in support of its claim and also furnished the additional evidences as mentioned in para 4.2 of the impugned order. The Ld. CIT(A) forwarded the said evidences to the AO for verification and comments. The AO thereafter conducted the investigation in respect of the evidences submitted by the assessee and came to the following conclusion: The firm has produced voluminous data regarding drawings in paper form and softcopy in form of 9 CDs. The said CDs has been verified by me and to the best .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

than other options. As regards various expenses the firm has produced various Internet connection bills of MTNL, TATA etc., which has been used for the business. As regards, salary to staff it is seen that the assessee has 2 units one at Mumbai and at Nasik, total strength of the firm in human resource is totaling to about 88 employees. From the details of employees and qualifications, it is seen that the employees are all qualified to do the requisite firms work." Relying upon the remand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

equisite expertise and qualification required for the work of the assessee and that the assessee had actually carried out the business during the relevant financial year. All the claims have been duly verified by the AO and in view of this, he deleted the addition. 4. We do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld. CIT(A) arrived at after consideration of the relevant facts and the evidences submitted which is also based on the verifications conducted by the AO during the remand proceedings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version