Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

KOTHARI INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD. Versus TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANOTHER

2016 (1) TMI 1115 - SUPREME COURT

Principles of promissory estoppel - whether Principles can be invoked in favour of the appellants so as to entitle them to the benefit of concessional tariff of electricity? - Held that:- The principle of promissory estoppel would have no application to the case of the appellants so as to entitle the applellants any right to the continuation of the concessional tariff earlier granted. - The appellants have urged certain other issues to persuade the court to strike down the impugned action of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act in question, though in respect of its caustic soda unit, the assessment of profit/loss made by the industry as a whole and not by the unit alone, cannot be said to be an arbitrary or irrational basis for determining the application of the impugned G.O. to the appellants in C.A.Nos.9748 and 9750 of 2003. Similarly in the case of the appellant National Oxygen Ltd. the refusal of the respondent to compute the issue of profit/loss by distributing the depreciation of cylinders for a period of fiv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the State and not for the court to determine what should be the policy for grant/refusal of concessional power at different points of time. These are questions that must be left to the State and not to the Courts to decide. - C.A. 9748 OF 2003 With C.A. NO. 9749/2003 & C.A. NO. 9750/2003 - Dated:- 29-1-2016 - GOGOI, RANJAN, MISHRA, ARUN AND PANT,PRAFULLA CHANDRA, JJ For Parties : Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Sr. Adv., Mr. E.R. Kumar, Adv., Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Adv., M/s. Parekh & Co., Adv., Mr. Ni .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appellants so as to entitle them to the benefit of concessional tariff of electricity. 2. Civil Appeal No.9748 of 2003 and Civil Appeal No. 9750 of 2003 have identical facts. In fact the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 9750 of 2003 is the successor-in-interest of the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 9748 of 2003. The facts in the third appeal i.e. Civil Appeal No. 9749 of 2003 are also largely similar. 3. The appellant in C.A.No.9748 of 2003 M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. had proposed to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

caustic soda units in the State for the first three years and thereafter the rates will be at par with that of the other two units in the State. 4. Admittedly the unit of the appellant had started commercial production with effect from January, 1979. On 23.2.1979 the Tamil Nadu Revision of Tariff Rates on supply of Electrical Energy Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) came into force. 5. Section 2(b) of the Act defines tariff in the following terms: Tariff means the rate of tariff le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The schedule to the Act, inter alia, provides that in the case of new industries, concessional tariff would be charged after commencement of the production in the following manner- For the first Three years ..... 66-2/3 Per cent of the High Tension rates under 1(A) (B) as the case may be. For the fourth year ...... 80 Per cent of the High Tension rates under 1(A), 1(B) as the case may be. For the firth year ...... 90 Per cent of the High Tension rates under 1(A) (B) as the case may be. For the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

82. 7. On the above basis, a demand was raised on the appellants for consumption of electricity at the normal rate of tariff applicable on the ground that the industries had started earning profits. The said demand insofar as the appellant, M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. and Southern Petro Chemical Industries Corporation Ltd. is concerned is for the period from May 1982 to November, 1983, while for the appellant National Oxygen Ltd. the period is May 1982 to April, 1984. 8. The appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is to be construed to be legally permissible, the same would have no application to the appellants which were loss making concerns. The said claim was negatived by the High Court leading to the appeals before us. 9. We have heard Shri Pravin H. Parekh and Ms. Nalini Chidambaram, learned senior counsels for the appellants in C.A. No 9748 of 2003 and C.A. No 9750 of 2003 and Shri Krishnamurthi Swami, learned counsel for the appellant in C.A.No.9749 of 2003. We have also heard Shri Subramonium Pra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stion would not even arise inasmuch as at the time when the unit was set up and had started commercial production, the Act had not yet come into force. The promise, if any, was made by the letter dated 29.6.1976 on the terms noticed above, namely, the tariff payable by the industry was to be at a rate less than what was applicable to the other two units of the State for the first three years and thereafter at the rate equivalent to what was being paid by the said two units. 11. Be that as it may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cessional tariff/rebate was granted and the provisions of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act as well as the provisions of the U.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 under which the concessional tariff/rebate was later withdrawn this Court in para 51 came to the following conclusion - From the above discussion, it is clear that the petitioners cannot raise plea of estoppel against the Notification dated 7.8.2000 reducing hill development rebate to 0% as there can be no estoppel against the statute .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted by the State Government so that the beneficiaries of such concession are not required to pay the tax or duty they are otherwise liable to pay under such statute. The recipient of a concession has no legally enforceable right against the Government to grant of a concession except to enjoy the benefits of the concession during the period of its grant. This right to enjoy is a defeasible one in the sense that it may be taken away in exercise of the very power under which the exemption was grant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ise were liable to discharge. The rebate was a privilege granting an advantage which was not made available to others. The rebate granted under Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act of 1948 was, therefore, a concession granted by the State Government so that the beneficiaries of such concessions were not required to pay the electricity tariff they were otherwise liable to pay under the said Act during the period of its grant. The petitioners, as recipients of a concession, accepted to enjoy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntinuation of the concessional tariff earlier granted. 15. The appellants have urged certain other issues to persuade the court to strike down the impugned action of the respondents in withdrawing the concessional tariff, the foremost being that the industries in question had earned no profits so as to attract the withdrawal/disabling condition introduced in the Amended Schedule. In this regard it is pointed out that Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. had incurred losses as a whole though its c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version