Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Sheetal Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, CIRCLE 8 (1) , CR Building

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - assessment was made u/s 144 - unaccounted sale consideration - Held that:- We are of the considered view that the assessee has not furnished inaccurate particulars of income and there are no findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT (Appeals) that the details furnished by the assessee in his return are found to be inaccurate or erroneous or false. Under these circumstances, in our view the penalty in dispute is totally unwarranted and deserve to be deleted. According .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2007-08 on the following grounds:- 1. Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) is not justified in law and facts and circumstances of the case in confirming penalty of ₹ 54,615/- without taking into account submissions made with documentary evidence before the AO and the copy of the same was also before CIT(A). 2. Ld. CIT(A) is grossly erred in confirming the addition even without referring the document furnished before her and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3,17,150/- on 8.11.2007. The assessment was completed u/s. 144 vide order dated 30.10.2009 at an income of ₹ 1,66,58,750/- making addition of ₹ 1,37,92,738/- as unaccounted sale consideration and disallowing ₹ 60,000/- on a/c of rebate and discounts and ₹ 1,02,255/- on account of freight and octroi. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) were also initiated in the assessment order itself. But due to the pending appellate proceedings, the penalty proceedings were kept in abeya .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee went in further appeal before the ITAT on the above disallowance and the ITAT dismissed the appeal of the assessee. In response to show cause notice u/s. 271(1)(c) dated 4.8.2011, the assessee filed a detailed reply vide letter dated 16.8.2011 through its Counsel. The assessee submitted that it has not made any concealment or furnished inaccurate particulars . Only addition has been confirmed by the CIT(A) is not lead to concealment and on this basis no penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) can be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ide order dated 29.8.2011. 3. Against the above Penalty Order dated 29.8.2011 passed by the Assessing Officer, assessee appealed before the Ld. First Appellate Authority, who vide impugned order dated 05.9.2012 dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Against the above order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 5.9.2012, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel of the assessee has submitted that in response to show cause notice u/s. 271(1)(c) dated 4.8.2011, the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that no satisfaction for concealment was recorded by the AO and the case laws cited by the assessee in the reply has not been discussed at all. Therefore, the amount of ₹ 54,615/- does not attract any penalty. In support of his contention, he relied upon the decision of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products 322 ITR 158 (SC) and requested that penalty in dispute may be deleted. 6. On the other hand, Ld. DR relied upon the order of the authorities below and re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ate its claims and provide documentary evidence. The assessee only submitted details long after the assessment had been completed. Also the assessee did not contest the findings of the assessment before the Hon'ble ITAT. As per Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) of IT Act; where in respect of any facts material to the computation of the total income of any person under this Act,- (A)such person falls to offer; an explanation or offers an explanation which is found by the Assessing Officer or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me in respect of which particulars have been concealed. Thus in re case of the assessee since the assessee failed to offer an explanation it is held that the Explanation 1 to section 271(l)(c) of the Act is squarely attracted and the additions made during the course of assessment in c,pll1puting the income of the assessee shall be deemed to represent the income in respect of which particulars have been concealed. It has been held by the courts that the revenue is not required to establish that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Sab (1994) 205 ITR 244 and CIT vs. KR Sadayappan (1990) 185 ITR 49, 54. In a recent case, the Supreme Court, in the case of Union of India vs. Dharmendra Textile Processors (306 ITR 277), held that the object behind enactment of section 271(1)(c) read with Explanations indicate that the said section has been enacted to provide for a remedy for loss of revenue and they create the element of strict liability on the assessee for concealment or for giving inaccurate particulars while filing return. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccurate particulars of his income with a view to wilfully evade taxes. A penalty of ₹ 54,615/- is therefore imposed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the I.T. 8. After perusing the finding of the AO made in his penalty order as well as finding in impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A), we are not in agreement with the finding of the Ld. CIT(A), because the mere fact that an addition is confirmed in quantum proceedings cannot be conclusive of the imposition of penalty. In this regard, we refer the decision of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ished inaccurate particulars of its income and is liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(c), which did not establish that how the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of its income. In our view, as regards the furnishing of inaccurate particulars, no information given in the return was found to be incorrect or inaccurate. We further find that section 271(1)(c) postulates imposition of penalty for furnishing of inaccurate particulars and concealment of income. In this regard, we draw our support .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version